Saturday, 5 May 2012

Once again The Guardian has added to its record of unfortunate rhetoric aimed at Britain's Jewish community, this time trying to cover it up



Guardian Blames “Jewish Political Establishment” | The Commentator

The original text in print. Something that editor's can't delete
The original text in print. Something that editor's can't delete
Raheem Kassam, Executive EditorHarry Cole, UK Political Editor

By Raheem Kassam andHarry Cole

on 5 May 2012 at 9am

1 2 3 4 5

total rating of 3.67

Sponsored Message:Argentina

It seems that ever-wrong British newspaper The Guardian has made yet another blunder in what can only be described as a serious and continued internal confusion over 'the Jews'. 

The Guardianself-admittedly has form with ingrained anti-Semitism within the rank and file.

Following the Labour mayoral candidate Ken Livingstone's loss to Boris Johnson last night, the print edition of 

The Guardian asserted that it was Ken's own baggage that brought him down. We couldn't agree more, but on a scan through the article and as highlighted by various people on Twitter this morning, we found this:

"How much damage did he [Ken] inflict by failing to make peace with the Jewish political establishment..."

This could be interpreted quite innocuously at first, or conversely, be read into as The Guardian tarring the 

entire British political establishment as Jewish run. But putting the quote in context regarding Ken's Nazi insult

 to Jewish reporter Oliver Finegold and the 'embrace of Muslim cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi' we see further into what The Guardianis getting at.

This appears to be a case of foot-in-mouth disease once again, painting an image of a London Jewry led by a

 cabal of high-power, high-profile men and women pulling the strings over every Jew in London, and quite

 possibly non-Jews like us as well. "Vote as we say!" The Guardian might imagine, "Or you'll lose our your

 invite to the annual London Jewish gathering where we all talk about Iran and read passages from 

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion!"The Guardian has adopted a tone in its writing about 

British Jewry that actually, unintentionally, lampoons their own approach to this small but diverse 

community.

Perhaps we jest too much though and this was a perfectly okay thing to say. Why then, did The Guardian 

choose toscrub the text 'Jewish political establishment' from the article on its website, without a hint of an admission, and replace it with the term 'Jewish communal leadership'? Perhaps an editor at The Guardian took 

one look at the sentence, spat out his bagel and demanded a retraction? But there's no such retraction on the website itself, and trying to erase from existence what found its way into the print edition is a faux pas more 

befitting Johann Hari than Alan Rusbridger. Or is it?

Hugh Muir, who wrote this article, seems to also imply that Jewish voters only have time to consider Nazi slurs

 and Muslim clerics. Surely Jewish people might be more sensitive to being called Nazis but these are things

 that many Londoners would have considered when marking their vote against Ken on Thursday. Or perhaps

 it is the case that Mr. Muir believes that the Jewish community must be told by the 'political leadership' oops, 'communal leadership' how to vote. Waiting at their doors for instructions from 'the elders'?

We contacted The Guardian news desk today who told us exactly this:

"Hugh contacted us this morning. We had put up the first draft of his article. It was all him. He wanted that 

one paragraph changed. I don't know any more than that. It was his first draft that we put up by mistake." 

Interesting. Tweets and e-mails directed at @Hugh_Muir and hugh.muir@guardian.co.uk went unanswered.

Either way, while it may be regarded as a simple Freudian slip, The Guardian's attitude towards

 Britain's Jewish community shines through once again. The deeply rooted flippancy over conflating the 

Jews and the political establishment, the Jews and their voting patterns, the Jews and their being 'still 

sore' over Nazi jibes and anti-Semitism is yet another sign of how out of touch The Guardian is with all 

politics, all Londoners and even basic journalistic ethics.

UPDATE:

Following our article, the author of the original piece in The Guardian, Hugh Muir, tweeted this:

and this...

And you thought the little guy (us) couldn't make a difference...

Raheem Kassam is the Executive Editor of The Commentator and tweets at @RaheemJKassam.

 Harry Cole is the UK Political Editor of The Commentator and tweets at @MrHarryCole