T

I do not hold Tamar responsible for Netanyahu's actions and not knowing why he does what he does, as I would not hold you responsbile for not knowing PM Brown's actions,  and that you apologize for your last email. 

 

I  HAVE UPSET TAMAR, FOR SENDING AN EMAIL TO VARIOUS PARTIES CRITICISING  HER WITHOUT FIRST DISCUSSING ISSUES WITH HER.

FOR THAT I APOLOGISE.

HAROLD HOFFMAN.

..............................................

Now ......I shall state the following:-

Tamar
 
And If I am proven wrong, which I hope I am,
 
 I will be happy to come on your show or you have my pemission for me to apologise PUBLICLY IN Upsetting you  and you can quote me on that any time any where.  

Tamar
this is a reply 

 
Too right Im emotional...and angry with all the B/S being uttered and muttered like confetti thrown at a wedding.
 
When the leader of your/our country cant be bothered to speak to the jews of the uk on record....may he and his cabal and all that cabal in Israel " feur on der kishkes"
 
THE STATE OF  ISRAEL is no different today than the EU /UK /USA.... and as a wiser man than I once said 
H*SH*M wont come and reside in a lavatory.
 And Israel Politics is a cess pit of corruption evil and ego selfishness.
 
Thats the issue that I address.....if that scenario and view upsets you then Im sorry you feel that way..... 

T

********************************

 The issue is that you went and publically attacked me unjustifiably - because I did not have an answer for you, because I do not know what is going on inside of the PM's head, and I said so, and addressed your email and concerns, and gave you that respect and attention, and courtesy of replying and addressing the issue and taking time from my show and publicicizing it - because you wrote me.  

And what was the result of this good will, and only good will that I had for you and your 'just' concerns that I agree with?  - 

You turn on me? 

You write a public email and send it out and attack me?  

You also did not even give me the courtesy to speak with me first. 

 You are also supposed to be a friend, and the fact that you would go and do such a mean and unjust and un-jewish thing, surprises and hurts me VERY MUCH.

hh
 
Face it  the Jews in Israel are facing a threat not only on their borders but an evil cancer within thats eating away at the body of Israel.
 
Thats my perogative and many of those that I follow Jews and non jews  and some of which listen to my site jews and non jews......
 
Unless the house of h*sh*m is cleansed from the inside first..there's no way what we all pray for in each his.her own way will be accomplished......
 
The body and land will die again for another 2-5000 years

You want to talk about all this fine otherwise the rest is all commentary after Bibi and his sh*ye cabal have shown exactly what their agenda has become.  

t

Again, I agree with the point you make, that it seems very odd and strange and a giant missed opportunity and a lack of respect for the Jewish and other Israel supporters in Britain, but why you would react with a direct atack against me? - this I do not understand and I feel this was  unjustifed, professionally wrong, and also that I was betrayed by someone I believed was my friend. 

Harold, you condemn me  because I did not know an answer to a question you wanted me to know.  Am I privy to the goings on of the PM?  Do you think I am a mind reader and have an answer for all his actions?  Harold, there may be other questions you want answers to that I do not know.  Will you also make an attack in the future  because I honestly do NOT know the answer? 

Harold, if I aksed YOU, "What is going on with your British PM because he did this or that, would I EVER publically send a mass email out  in an atack against you because you did not have the answer for me?   Do you see how  non-sensical and unjust and awful that would be if someone did that to YOU? 
Harold, I am hurt and bewildered.

once again tamar for your upset I apologise.

Reference our Prime minister so called....please dont go down that road...there is too  much information within the cabal community as to his behaviour patterns...............

must be contagious amongst many of the international political elite...........................

Lets start talking tachlish in future.....theres too much intellectual/emotional B/S 

THAT MISLEADS MANY.

SO HOPEFULLY A CLEAN SLATE ....KNOW WHERE EACH STANDS  

WITH THE PRAYER THAT H*SH*M RESTS ON ALL YOU AND YOUR FAMILY

HAROLD

In last three days, four tunnel entrances found in border_
US trebles MOP "bunker buster" bombs order, wants them fast
DEBKAfile Special Report
September 1, 2009, 9:44 AM (GMT+02:00)

MOP: Twenty-one foot long "bunker buster" bomb
In view of new information about Iran and North Korea's underground nuclear facilities, the US Air Force has asked to speed up the delivery of 10 to 12 giant Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker buster bombs, according to Air Force Lt. Gen. Mark Shackelford.
Unusually, DEBKAfile's military sources report, the order has been trebled in less than a year.
More...

Six nations may reveal data concealed by ELBaradei on Iran's nuclear progress
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report
August 31, 2009, 5:06 PM (GMT+02:00)

Iran is up to "weapon design" stage
US, Israel and four other governments are urgently discussing the release of intelligence that Iran is running covert military nuclear projects parallel to its civilian program after Mohammed ElBaradei, director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, withheld this data from his last report, DEBKAfile's military and intelligence sources disclose.
The four governments are Britain, France, Netherlands and Japan.
More...

Israeli Arab used membership of same gym to spy on Chief of Staff

DEBKAfile Special Report

August 31, 2009, 4:33 PM (GMT+02:00)

Rauy Sultani, 23, from the Israeli Triangle town of Tirah was brought to trial before the Petach Tikva district court Monday, Aug. 31, accused of being recruited by the Lebanese Hizballah to spy on the Israeli chief of staff Lt. Gen. Gaby Ashkenazi. Sultani is accused of grave offenses against state security, passing information to the enemy and contact with a foreign agent. 
More...

Tuesday, September 01, 2009

china confidential

 

Iran on Track to Be First Nuclear Terror Regime

IBD on the Axis of Evil:

North Korean arms bound for the Islamic Republic of Iran in violation of U.N. sanctions were intercepted, but Tehran will still be the first nuclear terror regime. No wonder Dick Cheney wanted to attack.

Continue here:

# posted by Confidential Reporter @ 7:42 AM links to this post 

 

Japan's New Leader: US Capitalism is Immoral

Left turn in Japan.

The victorious opposition leader sees US-style capitalism as "void of morals or moderation." Click here for the story.

With Friends Like Gaddafi Who Needs Enemies?

From the desk of A. Millar on Tue, 2009-09-01 09:21

The release of Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi from his Scottish jail just over a week ago was greeted by open suspicion and contempt by the British public. Al-Megrahi’s prostate cancer, along with a hefty dose of “compassion,” was the official version, read out by Kenny MacAskill, Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Justice. Accordingly, al-Megrahi – who was convicted of murdering 270 people (mostly Americans) by blowing up the Pan Am Flight 103 over the town of Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988 – was going home to die. The decision, MacAskill said at the time, was his, and his alone.
 
Much to the embarrassment of the Scottish and British governments, a few days ago, Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam strongly implied that the release had been down to a deal about oil. The Times of London has since corroborated this, revealing that the decision had been taken two years ago, when discussions between Libya and energy giant BP, aimed at securing a multi-billion dollar, oil exploration agreement, had stalled. Once al-Megrahi’s release was put on the table, an agreement between Libya and BP was reached.
 
According to one newly leaked letter from Justice Secretary Jack Straw to MacAskill, the British government believed it to be “in the overwhelming interests of the United Kingdom.”
 
How many in the government think that now?
 
Before his release, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton publicly called for al-Meghari to serve the remainder of his sentence in Scotland. Perhaps, this might seem a bit rich, considering the Obama administration’s enthusiasm for closing Guantanamo Bay and downplaying the terrorist threat, but the Democrats have their finger on the pulse in this instance. Many Americans are simply enraged at the decision to free al-Megrahi, and websites have already appeared, calling for US citizens to boycott British goods.
 
Boycott’s don’t last. But, reputations do. Scotland’s and Britain’s have been badly damaged. Prime minister Gordon Brown – though characteristically AWOL as accusations began to fly – sent Gaddafi a letter, imploring him to treat al-Megrahi’s arrival in Libya “with sensitivity.” It was all supposed to be low key. Instead al-Megrahi was treated to a hero’s welcome.
 
And like Saif al-Islam’s comments, the fanfare that met al-Megrahi seemed designed to embarrass the British government as much as possible.
 
Gaddafi is no ally, but a cunning individual with a keen sense for manipulating the West’s weakest points. “Europe is in a predicament, and so is America,” he once said, expressing his delight at the possibility of an Islamic Europe. For Gaddafi, the predicaments of others are opportunities to exploit. 
 
Last year, when his youngest son, Hannibal, was arrested in Switzerland for mistreating two of his domestic servants, two Swiss nationals were arrested in Libya – apparently in retaliation – although soon released. Libya then withdrew $7 billion from Swiss bank accounts, cut economic ties, and stopped supplying Switzerland with oil. This bullying had the desired effect, and the Swiss president was soon flying to Libya, to apologize for his country’s “unjust” arrest.
 
The al-Megrahi affair has now left the Scottish and British governments looking like amateurs, outclassed by the same tin pot dictator. That it has placed even greater strain on the “special relationship” is deeply regrettable, because with friends like Gaddafi who needs enemies?

 A. Millar Part I

Submitted by traveller on Tue, 2009-09-01 23:16.

Please find my reaction here to your article.

THE CRIMINAL CRIMINALISATION OF LIBYA

Reading now since years about the “terrorist” Libyans and their “mad” dictator, I decided that enough is enough.

Please find my reaction to your article here.

Together with my friend Yves Bonnet, ex-director general of the French DST under Mitterand, we decided to publish a short version of the chapter covering Lockerbie in his new book about Khaddaffi. I just translated and shortened the text for this blog.

21 December 1988 a Boeing 747 exploded in flight over the Scottish town of Lockerbie. Most of the passengers were US military personnel, based in Germany and flying home for the Christmas Holiday. 11 villagers of Lockerbie die in the crash and the total number of victims amounts to 270.
The same day, without any relation to the crash, President Reagan declares during a press conference that the US might consider a military strike against a chemical warfare factory in Libya.
4 January 1990 2 Mig aircraft of the Libyan air force are shot down by US fighter aircraft over the Mediterranean Sea.

Because of the hardening of the US stance against Libya, it would be natural to expect the US to start accusing Libya for the Lockerbie terrorist attack. No such accusations come forward.
Five months after the Lockerbie crash, 11th May 1989, the Washington Post publishes an article echoing the “near certainty” of the CIA of the identity of the terrorists, it points at the splinter group of Ahmed Jibril of the Front for the Liberation of Palestine, general command, a big name for a small hard group,. created in 1968. This small, difficult to infiltrate group is blatantly revolutionary, based in Syria and according to the CIA, backed and controlled in this case by the Iranians as revenge for the accidental shooting down of an Iranair Airbus on 3rd of July 1988 over the strait of Ormuz, making 290 victims. So far everything follows a certain logic. The US State Department follows this same line and to be sure those diplomats are not known to jump to conclusions lightly. The more so that there are still a number of American hostages in Lebanon under the control of Syria and Iran. We can be sure that the State Department has thoroughly investigated this case before following the same logic.
The 10th of August 1990, to the utter surprise of all observers, Syria, after condemning the Iraqi invasion in Kuwait, sends troops to Saudi Arabia together with the troops of the most US friendly nations Egypt and Morocco. This is definitely a victory for the US diplomacy, which continues by trying to obtain the military support of Iran. The Islamic Republic of Iran, which just previously has condemned the invasion of Kuwait. choses this very moment to sign a peace treaty with Saddam Hussain, accepting the proposals of Saddam Hussain of exchanging war prisoners and retreat of the Iraqi troops of Iranian occupied territories.

The benefits are immediate: Syria immediately starts an offensive in Lebanon against the troops of Michel Aoun 13 october 1990 and invade Beyrouth.The new US friends of Hafez el Assad keep very quiet before this aggression, doubled up with the assassination of Dany Chamoun, leader of the supporters of Michel Aoun, together with the murder of his whole family.
In Washington meanwhile, the official declarations start to change: “it seems that new elements indicate that the bomb of flight 103 had been assembled and placed by Libyan agents of the Libyan secret services. In order to stay a little bit credible they add that this does not exclude the cooperation of the Syrian, Iranian and Palestinian services.
The US judicial is launched with 2 objectives in mind: accuse the Libyans and exonerate the Syrians and Iranians.
The first objective is reached by the accusation of 2 Libyan agents by the US and British judges, on 14 November 1991: Abdelbasset al Megrahi and Fahima.
The second objective is reached this same 14th November 1991 by the declaration of the chief of the criminal investigation department of the Department of Justice, confirming that no proof exist of the implication of Iran and Syria in this Lockerbie case. This same official adds that this has nothing to do with the desire of the US, to have friendly relations with Syria.
A miraculous lucky moment arrived on the 4th of November, or 10 days before, when Terry Anderson, the last US hostage has been freed, after Joseph Cicippio, Alann Steen and the British hostage Terry Waite.

"As a biased broadcaster ..."

"As a biased broadcaster ..."

Nick Cohen in Standpoint Magazine :

A while ago, a BBC producer phoned to tell me I had written a "controversial" book. I knew that already, and gathered from the teeth-sucking sound coming down the line that she did not approve.

"So," she continued, "we've lined up four guests to argue against you." 

I told her to go away — maybe I used a stronger term — and then thought about her predicament. As a biased broadcaster, she wanted to hear my book denounced, but she could not risk organising a one-on-one debate. Maybe I would have come out on top. More probably, some listeners would have agreed with me, others with my opponent, as is the normal way of things. By arranging her show to make it four against one, however, she could maintain the illusion of impartiality while creating the impression in listeners' mind that the consensus was overwhelmingly against arguments she found uncomfortable. In the interests of "balance" and of letting "everyone have their say", she would fill 80 per cent of the airtime with advocates of her own political position. I have watched out for rigged debates ever since. They are the surest signal the BBC dares send that an idea does not deserve a hearing in polite society.

I'm a bit busy today, and haven't time to give chapter and verse from the B-BBC archives. Let Mr Cohen give us the latest example :

Ophelia Benson did not quite get the four-on-one treatment when she appeared on Radio 3's cultural talk show Nightwaves to discuss a"controversial" book she has co-authored with Jeremy Stangroom. They gave her a mere two opponents, and the presenter tried to be fair. Still, when one adversary stopped disparaging her, the other started, as the BBC flashed warning signs to listeners to ignore her.

(The book, called "Does God Hate Women ?", is 'controversial' in that it does not restrict its targets to Bible-bashing rednecks in the United States. Had it done so, I'd probably be hearing readings on 'Woman Sour' this morning !)

ARTIFICIAL TREES

Another day on the BBC and another example of eco-wackery. This time, ladies and gentlemen, I offer you artificial trees. The underlying premise, of course, is that mankind is to blame for "climate change" - that is settled science, right? Listening to Professor Hoskins is really quite frightening and yet this is what the Royal Society is thinking. I wish they didn't bother.

SAM'S BARRED?

How DARE British security services keep an eye on Communist sympathisers back in the 1950's? Have a listen to this paean to Sam Wanamaker. There's nothing the BBC likes better than a Commie lover.

FUEL UP, COULD BE WORSE

Hope all you motorists out there enjoy filling up this morning at the higher pump price care of Mr Brown and his pals. Watched the BBC news cover this topic last night and they helpfully showed us that fuel prices were even higher in France and Germany so it could be worse, right? In the BBC world, the motorist can never be punished enough for having the temerity not to use "public transport" and attempts are made all the time to justify punitive government action against the road user. If only we would all work for the government and travel at assignated times in State provided transport...sigh....

The Holocaust Tool

>> MONDAY, AUGUST 31, 2009

This is not straightforward bias, but an example of painfully elaborate impartiality. AKA tolerance of the intolerant, or the other one: 'there is nothing so unequal as the equal treatment of unequals’. The BBC has been announcing in its hourly news bulletins, that Hamas has “slammed” its friend and supporter UNWRA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency) for having the audacity to suggest the Jewish Holocaust might be included in the curriculum of the schools they run in Gaza. The BBC reports this in the simplified manner they deem appropriate for their simpleminded readers. But although they have omitted to add the usual scare quotes or indeed “Israel says” to the penultimate paragraph, - ‘During the Holocaust, Nazi Germany murdered some six million Jews’ - the last paragraph goes some way to counterbalance the omission. “However, the event's significance is often disputed in parts of the Middle East where Israel is seen as the enemy and the Holocaust is seen as a tool used by Israel to justify its actions.” Contrast this with the other report, from a Chinese news agency. This report, written for adults, includes some rather revealing quotes from one Husam Ahmed, including this one about the material in question: “".....was formed in a way that shows sympathy with the Jews." He warned of having an attitude "to construct a generation that supports the Jews and the Holocaust" in the Palestinian territories.  The article takes care to show that the thing Hamas fears most about teaching the Holocaust is that it might spark sympathetic feelings in the children, and they might stop hating Jews and striving to eliminate the Zionist entity. Less danger of that sentiment coming through in the BBC’s report; they must at all times be careful to avoid any traces of partiality.

Tuesday, 01 September 2009 Doctor Admits Euthanizing Patient During Hurricane Katrina 'A doctor has admitted that he gave orders for a lethal dose of medication to be administered to a patient under his care during the hurricane Katrina disaster in 2005 - a decision that he says he does not regret having made.' Read more...

Tuesday, 01 September 2009 Elderly Couple Forced into State Custody

Tuesday, 01 September 2009 US Hummers Enter Pakistan, Undercover American Soldiers In Islamabad 'Undercover armed Americans are swarming the Pakistani capital in the latest sign that the elected government has allowed Washington to dispatch what is believed to be a large number of American special operations agents and contractual security guards, including the infamous Blackwater private militia. This comes at a time when whistleblowers within the government and the military are reporting the arrival of a large number of US Marines in Pakistan.  Some reports put the figure at 1,000 US soldiers, much of whom are thought to be arriving as part of the massive expansion of the US Embassy and four consulates across the country.  While the US embassy continues to deny this, new buildings are under construction to house security teams.  The expanded US embassy is supposed to become the largest US embassy in the world.' Read more...

Tuesday, 01 September 2009 Phasing Out 100W Lightbulbs 'Could Damage Health of Britons' Yes, and that's the idea  'The Government is putting its green credentials ahead of the health of Britons as old-fashioned and 100W lightbulbs are phased out under EU rules which come into force this week, campaigners said.' Read more...

Tuesday, 01 September 2009 Californians Told to Prepare for Mass Evacuation 'California's Governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, has urged the residents of Los Angeles to prepare for a mass evacuation in the event of a public call to flee raging fires.' Read more...

Tuesday, 01 September 2009 French Government Document Details Forced Mass Vaccination Plans From September 28th 'The document dated August 21st and signed by the French Health Minister Rosaylne Batchelot-Narquin and the French Minister of Interior, Minister of the Interior, Overseas Territories Brice Hortefeux is addressed to the heads of each of France’s defense zones. the regional prefects in charge of police and the gendamerie, the prefects of departments and the heads of regional health authorities for hospitalization. The objective of the 19-page document is the systematic vaccination of the entire French population in the period October, November, December 2009 and January 2010. Secure facilities are to be established in every region that will serve as “vaccination centers”.' Read more... Read the document in French here...

The Sovereign Independent Newspaper Launch

'On October 2nd this year, the people of Ireland will be asked to vote, for a second time, on the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, practically replacing the Irish Constitution. Even though last year the Irish people spoke and democratically rejected it, the powers that be decided that this was not going to be accepted. On the morning of last year's count, An Taoiseach and Foreign Minister Michael Martin told the other EU Governments to ignore their own people's vote and to continue with ratifying Lisbon.'

See here...