Tuesday, 5 August 2008

Paulson Loses Control Over US Financial System



By F. William Engdahl 
8-4-8

http://www.rense.com/general82/paulson.htm
 
When Henry Paulson agreed to leave his job as chairman of the powerful Wall Street investment bank, Goldman Sachs to go to Washington as Treasury Secretary in 2006 he demanded extraordinary powers as de facto economic czar. He got it. Paulson is also head of the President's Working Group on Financial Markets -- the secretary of the treasury and the chairmen of the Federal Reserve Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
 
The Working Group is the financial world's equivalent of the Pentagon war room. Paulson, not Fed chairman Bernanke, is the person running the Administration's crisis management. And his recent actions indicate he has lost control as the snowballing problems from the semi-government mortgage companies Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to the collapse of the multi-trillion dollar market in Asset Backed Securities (ABS) to the real economy are compounding into the worst crisis since the 1930's Great Depression.
 
'The US banking system is sound'
 
In an eerie echo of President Herbert Hoover in 1930, during a Presidential campaign against Roosevelt , following the stock market crash and collapse of numerous smaller banks, Paulson recently appeared on national TV to declare "our banking system is a safe and sound one." He added that the list of "troubled" banks "is a very manageable situation." In fact what he did not say was that the US bank deposit insurance fund, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has a list of problem banks that numbers 90. Not included on that list are banks such as Citigroup, until recently the largest bank in the world.
 
The statement is hardly reassuring. The California savings bank, IndyMac Bank which was declared insolvent a month ago was not on the FDIC list a week before it collapsed. The reality is the crisis created by "securitizing" millions of home mortgages into new financial instruments and selling the packages to pension funds and investors is unfolding like a snowball rolling down the Swiss Alps.
 
Indication of the lack of control is the statement just weeks ago by Paulson that "financial institutions must be allowed to fail." That was two weeks before Paulson went to Congress to ask for "Congressional authority to buy unlimited stakes in and lend to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." As I noted in my recent piece, Financial Tsunami: The Next Big Wave is Breaking: Fannie Mae Freddie Mac and US Mortgage Debt , those two private companies insured some $6 trillion worth of home mortgages, half the entire US mortgage debt. Paulson defended the request by calling Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae "the only functioning part of the home loan market."
 
That comes back to the statement about a "sound banking system". Can we have a sound banking system where the only functioning part is literally insolvent-its debts greater than its assets?
 
It is well known on Wall Street that some of the largest financial institutions have huge undeclared problems with Asset Backed Securities they have valued far above their worth to make their books look better than they are. The names Citigroup, Lehman Bros., Morgan Stanley, even Paulson's old firm, Goldman Sachs and of course the inventor of sub-prime mortgage securitization, Merrill Lynch, all hold a huge percentage of what are called Level Three assets, these being assets where no one is willing to buy but the bank declares their worth based on "fantasy." In short the value of those core financial institutions of the US financial system is massively overvalued compared with their value were they forced to sell into the open market today. In a sobering aside, readers should not expect any serious economic remedies for the crisis from a President Barack Obama. Obama's National Campaign Finance Chairman is Chicago real estate billionaire, Penny Pritzker, who is heir to among other things the Hyatt Hotels. It was Pritzker together with Merrill Lynch ten years ago who first developed the model for securitizing "sub-prime" real estate, the trigger for the current Financial Tsunami crisis.
 
Already Citigroup has been forced to go to Dubai hat in hand and ask for billions in cash. After it announced it would not need more capital. Now Citigroup just announced plans to sell some $500 billion more assets to raise funds. Is Citigroup really solvent is the question sober investors are asking. Similarly Merrill Lynch raised $6.6 billion from Kuwait Mizuho, stated it was fine and weeks later had to raise still more capital. Morgan Stanley sold a 10% share of the company to China International Corp.
 
The real economy contracting rapidly
 
Behind the reassuring statements from Paulson and others that the "worst is over" the reality of the credit collapse since August 2007 is a deepening economic contraction which I have said several times in this space will surpass the Great Depression of the 1929-1938 period. A goof friend who is an unemployed homebuilder in a prosperous part of Arizona just sent me the following list of US department retail store closures. It is worth noting that over 70% of the US GDP is consumer spending and that the entire Federal Reserve strategy of Alan Greenspan after the March 2000 collapse of the stock market bubble, was to bring US interest rates to their lowest levels since the 1930's in order to stimulate consumer spending on credit, i.e. debt, to avoid "recession." Note the scale of the following store closings across America in recent weeks:
 
Ann Taylor closing 117 stores nationwide.
 
Eddie Bauer to close more stores after closing 27 stores in the first quarter.
 
Cache, a women's retailer is closing 20 to 23 stores this year.
 
Lane Bryant, Fashion Bug, Catherines closing 150 stores nationwide
 
Talbots, J. Jill closing stores. Talbots will close all 78 of its kids and men's stores plus another 22 underperforming stores. The 22 stores will be a mix of Talbots women's and J. Jill.
 
Gap Inc. closing 85 stores
 
Foot Locker to close 140 stores
 
Wickes Furniture is going out of business and closing all of its stores. The 37-year-old retailer that targets middle-income customers, filed for bankruptcy protection last month.
 
Levitz - the furniture retailer, announced it was going out of business and closing all 76 of its stores in December. The retailer dates back to 1910.
 
Zales, Piercing Pagoda plans to close 82 stores by July 31 followed by closing another 23 underperforming stores.
 
Disney Store owner has the right to close 98 stores.
 
Home Depot store closings 15 of them amid a slumping US economy and housing market. The move will affect 1,300 employees. It is the first time the world's largest home improvement store chain has ever closed a flagship store.
 
CompUSA (CLOSED).
 
Macy's - 9 stores closed
 
Movie Gallery  video rental company plans to close 400 of 3,500 Movie Gallery
 
and Hollywood Video stores in addition to the 520 locations the video rental
 
chain closed last fall as part of bankruptcy.
 
Pacific Sunwear - 153 Demo stores closing
 
Pep Boys - 33 stores of auto parts supplier closing
 
Sprint Nextel - 125 retail locations to close with 4,000 employees following 5,000 layoffs last year.
 
J. C. Penney, Lowe's and Office Depot are all scaling back
 
Ethan Allen Interiors : plans to close 12 of 300 stores to cut costs.
 
Wilsons the Leather Experts  closing 158 stores
 
Bombay Company: to close all 384 U.S.-based Bombay Company stores.
 
KB Toys closing 356 stores around the United States as part of its bankruptcy reorganization.
 
Dillard's Inc. will close another six stores this year.
 
For anyone familiar with American shopping malls and retailing, this represents a staggering part of the daily economic life of the nation, from furniture stores to clothing to video rentals to leather. The process has only begun and neither major party Presidential candidate has dared to mention this on the ground economic reality, because they evidently have no solutions to offer that would not jeopardize their campaign finances. Obama is tied to not only Pritzker but also to Omaha billionaire, Warren Buffett and George Soros. McCain depends on the traditional money contributions of the Republican Party which demand permanent tax reform for highest income earners and a pro-bank laissez faire treatment of millions of homeowners facing home foreclosure and asset seizure by banks.
 
Banks across the country have severely cut back on loans, fearful of bad debts. That has aggravated the consumer collapse documented above. Hundreds of thousands of real estate brokers, small and large bankers, furniture workers and salespeople, and construction workers are unable to find work. Jobs are being cut wholesale and those working are often on reduced hours. Car sales in June plunged by 28% for Ford, 18% for General Motors and even 21% for Toyota which will mean more layoffs in coming weeks. This will be the next wave of unemployment.
 
The economic reality is not reflected in official US Commerce Department or Labor Department statistics. There the data is constantly being "revised" to hide the grim reality in an election year.
 
My good friend, economist John Williams of California , has meticulously tracked such "data revisions" for more than 25 years and found the manipulation of reality so alarming that he founded an independent subscriber service titled "Shadow Government Statistics" ( http://www.shadowstats.com/ ), where he makes best estimate calculations of the reality not the official mythology.
 
By Williams' calculations the US economy first entered recession, defined as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth, at the end of 2006. Ever since, the recession has deepened, dramatically so in the past 12 months. Little known is the fact that the Labor Department also publishes six different unemployment statistics from U1, U2 through to U6 being the most comprehensive. The reported "official unemployment" is the very narrowly defined U3 which stands at 5.5%. However, as Williams notes, U6 is the real measure and that officially shows 9.7% unemployed. His calculations put the figure at 13.7% actually unemployed and seeking work.
 
A personal account
 
The unemployed homebuilder from Arizona I mentioned above recently sent me the following personal note on the situation. "Here is how it looks to people like me: Real estate dealings fuelled the economy in most areas of the country for the past decade or more. We've been in a market downturn for three years. We have seen the cost of doing business increase for builders, along with a big drop in buyers as everyone tightens their belts, or can't sell existing homes. Many employers have gone under ending thousands of jobs. If they have a job people are worried about losing it. Driving long distances to work is not possible with gasoline costs double that of 2006. There has been a 40% drop in most peoples' home equity worth. Many people are "underwater" on their homes, meaning they owe more than the market price is worth today. So many under-employed don't show up in government unemployed statistics. Self employed like me never get counted."
 
The Arizona homebuilder continued, "Today nobody is building. Unsold home inventories are triple that of 2003. Banks no longer give easy credit for home buyers. Many realtors I know have gone two years without selling a home. Empty storefronts are becoming common. In many areas unemployment among construction trades people is 50% or more. Tens of thousands of illegal Mexicans who did most of the manual labor have returned to Mexico to find work. What now? Well, I do handyman projects of all sorts, big or small and make about 70-90% of what it takes to survive with a family of a wife and three young children. My savings make up the rest. That can't go on for too much longer. We went from affluent and comfortable to nervous and broke with diminished opportunities in just three years. We used to be the middle class."
 
To be continued
 
By F. William Engdahl
www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net
 
COPYRIGHT © 2008 F. William Engdahl. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
 
* F. William Engdahl is the author of A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order (Pluto Press) and Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation , www.globalresearch.ca . The present series is adapted from his new book, now in writing, The Rise and Fall of the American Century: Money and Empire in Our Era. He may be contacted through his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net .

Hundreds of banks will fail, Roubini tells Barron's



Sun Aug 3, 2008 3:52pm EDT
 
Email | Print |  | Reprints | Single PageRecommend (6)

NEW YORK, Aug 3 (Reuters) - The United States is in the second inning of a recession that will last for at least 18 months and help kill off hundreds of banks, influential economist and New York University Professor Nouriel Roubini told Barron's in Sunday's edition.

Taxpayers will pay a big price for helping bail out the rest of the financial services industry as well, Roubini said -- at least $1 trillion and more likely $2 trillion.

The banks will become insolvent because of mounting losses as a result of the housing bust and because they have only written down their subprime loans so far, he said. Still in front of them are their consumer-credit losses, for which they lack the reserves, Barron's reported.

He also said there are hundreds of millions of dollars outstanding in home-equity loans that could be worth zero, too.

U.S. consumers, meanwhile, are "shopped out" and saving less, while the Federal Reserve's performance in handling the crisis has been poor, Roubini said, because it failed to see that the problem extended beyond subprime mortgage debt.

Now, Roubini told Barron's, the government is overregulating, bailing out troubled participants and intervening in every market.

"The regulators should investigate themselves for bailing out Fannie Mae (FNM.N: QuoteProfileResearchStock Buzz) and Freddie Mac (FRE.N:QuoteProfileResearchStock Buzz), the creditors of Bear Stearns and the financial system with new lending facilities. They have swapped U.S. Treasury bonds for toxic securities," he told Barron's. "It is privatizing the gains and profits, and socializing the losses as usual. This is socialism for Wall Street and the rich."

He said that sometimes it is necessary to use public money to rescue institutions, but in a way that does not bail out the people who made the mistakes. "In each one of these episodes, the government bailed out the shareholders, the bondholders, and to some degree, management," Roubini told Barron's.

As for the banks that will go bankrupt, they will include community banks that finance homes, stores, downtown areas, commercial real estate and other mainstays of U.S. towns and cities, Roubini said.

"Of three dozen or so medium-sized regional banks, a good third are in distress," he told Barron's, saying half of the group could go bankrupt. Some big banks could wind up insolvent, he added, but said they might be deemed too big to fail.

Nouriel stressed that he is "quite bullish" about the state of the global economy and that he is positive about the medium and long term.

(Reporting by Robert MacMillan, editing by Martin Golan)

A second, far larger wave of U.S. mortgage defaults is building

A foreclosed home in Ohio in July. Defaults on mortgages are likely to accelerate because many homeowners' monthly payments are rising rapidly. (Tony Dejak/The Associated Press)

A second, far larger wave of U.S. mortgage defaults is building

NEW YORK: The first wave of Americans to default on their home mortgages appears to be cresting, but a second, far larger one is building with alarming speed.

After two years of upward spiraling defaults, the problems with mortgages made to people with weak, or subprime, credit are showing the first, tentative signs of leveling off.

But with the U.S. economy struggling, homeowners with better credit are now falling behind on their payments in growing numbers. The percentage of mortgages in arrears in the category of loans one rung above subprime, so-called alternative-A, or alt-A, mortgages, quadrupled to 12 percent in April from a year earlier. Delinquencies among prime loans, which account for most of the $12 trillion market, doubled to 2.7 percent in that time.

While it is difficult to draw precise parallels among various segments of the mortgage market, the arc of the crisis in subprime loans suggests that the problems in the broader market may not peak for another year or two, analysts said.

Defaults are likely to accelerate because many homeowners' monthly payments are rising rapidly. The higher bills come as home prices continue to decline and banks are tightening their lending standards, making it harder for people to refinance loans or sell their homes. Of particular concern are alt-A loans, many of which were made to people with good credit scores without proof of their income or assets.

Much will depend on the course of the economy, particularly unemployment. A weaker job market would push more homeowners toward the financial brink. The U.S. Labor Department reported Friday that the unemployment rate climbed to a four-year high in July. Other downbeat reports last week documented another drop in home prices, slower economic growth than expected and a huge loss at General Motors.

"Subprime was the tip of the iceberg," said Thomas Atteberry, president of First Pacific Advisors, a investment firm in Los Angeles that trades mortgage securities. "Prime will be far bigger in its impact."

During a conference call with analysts last month, James Dimon, the chairman and chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, said he expected losses on prime loans at his bank to triple and described the outlook for them as "terrible."

Delinquencies on mortgages tend to peak three to five years after loans are made, said Mark Fleming, the chief economist at First American CoreLogic, a research firm. Not surprisingly, subprime loans from 2005 appear closer to the end than those made in 2007, for which default rates continue to rise steeply.

"We will hit those points in a few years and that will help in many ways," Fleming said, referring to the loans made later in the housing boom. "We just have to survive through this part of the cycle."

Data on securities backed by subprime mortgages show that 8.41 percent of loans from 2005 were delinquent by 90 days or more or in foreclosure in June, up from 8.35 percent in May, according to CreditSights, a research firm with offices in New York and London. By contrast, 16.6 percent of 2007 loans were troubled in June, up from 15.8 percent.

Some of that reflects basic math. Over the years, some loans will be paid off as homeowners sell or refinance, and some will be foreclosed and sold. That reduces the number of loans from those earlier years that could possibly default. Also, since the credit market seized up last year, lenders have become much more conservative and have stopped making most subprime loans and cut back on many other popular mortgages.

The resetting of rates on adjustable mortgages, which was a big fear of many analysts in 2006 and 2007, has become less problematic because the short-term interest rates that many of those loans are tied to have fallen significantly as the Federal Reserve has lowered U.S. rates. The recent U.S. tax rebates and efforts to modify more loans have also helped somewhat, analysts say.

What will sting borrowers more than rising interest rates, analysts say, is having to pay interest and principal every month after spending several years paying only interest or sometimes even less than that. Such loan terms were popular during the boom with alt-A and prime borrowers and made sense while home prices were rising and interest rates were low.

But now, payments could jump 50 percent or more for some borrowers, and they may not be able to sell their properties for as much as they owe.

Prime and alt-A borrowers typically had a five- or seven-year grace period before having to start making payments toward their principal. By contrast, subprime loans had a two- to three-year introductory period. That difference partly explains the lag in delinquencies between the two types of loans, said David Watts, an analyst with CreditSights.

Where Italy leads?


Tuesday, August 05, 2008


I don't think anyone is under any illusions – apart from the British media - as to why Berlusconi has put 3,000 armed troops on the streets of major Italian cities.

Ostensibly a measure to "help cut down crime", something claimed by both interior minister Roberto Maroni and his defence colleague Ignazio La Russo, this is nothing more than a fig-leaf, the Italians themselves being very well aware that most of the crime in Italy is Mafia-related, which will be untouched by this "crack-down".

If for "crime", however, you read "immigrants" – and in particular, the Roma – then the agenda becomes clearer, as does the timescale.

Coming on the back of the programme to fingerprint the inhabitants of the 700 or so immigrant encampments dotted around the major cities, the next move comes in October, when the "census" is finished, when the government plans to dismantle all remaining unauthorised settlements.

That the troops have been put on the streets now, with a deployment that is scheduled to last for an initial period of six months, is clearly – on the one hand - a pre-emptive strike, as unease grows at the scale of the "census", and – on the other - a preparation for the major upheaval that is to follow in a couple of months.

It is no coincidence, therefore, that in the main, the troops are being stationed mainly in or close to the camps and at the growing number of immigrant holding centres, all on the outskirts of the cities.

When the bulldozers move in during October – as indeed is planned – there is undoubtedly going to be trouble, as upwards of 160,000 gypsies are going to be targeted, even though up to three-quarters of them are Italian citizens.

That this "pogrom" will have the support of the bulk of Italian people is evidenced by a recent incident in Naples (pictured) when the bodies of two Roma girls who had drowned in the sea were left covered with towels while beachgoers continued to sunbathe.

Comparisons are now being made between this government's action and the census of Jews carried out by Benito Mussolin in 1938, the beginning of a process that put many of them in concentration camps. The Italian government, of course, denies any such connection, but its actions display a rooted determination to clear out what are clearly considered unwelcome "guests".

And all of this is going to present something of a problem for the "colleagues" in Brussels, who have been soft-peddling on their condemnation of the Rome government's action. When the troops go into action for real, however, even the EU is going to find it difficult to turn a blind eye. Unless it takes a firm line – where Italy leads, other member states will want to follow.

(NB: Blogger upload system for pics seems to be down - I'll try again later.)

COMMENT THREAD

Obama Showing Signs of Desperation

China Confidential

Foreign Reporting and Analysis Since April 2005

 



Dateline USA....

Barack Obama's new campaign ad branding his Republican opponent, John McCain, a tool of Big Oil, seems to signal desperation on the part of the ever-changing Candidate of Change. McCain is a strong advocate of domestic oil and gas development, which has not been championed in decades by multinational oil companies hooked on cheaper Middle Eastern supply agreements. 

In fact, the Democrats, dating to the Carter administration, and the first big energy crisis, have been steadfast foes of domestic oil and gas (and coal and shale). The no-drill Democrats are anti-industry, in the grip of environmental extremists led by former Vice President Al Gore, whose global warming fear-mongering menaces the nation--and all of modern civilization.


Minitruth


MONDAY, AUGUST 04, 2008



We learned over the weekend that the Home Office has outrageously spent £2m funding commercial TV series bigging themselves up:

"Unlike normal documentaries, the programmes are commissioned by ministers with the purpose of showing their policies or activities in a sympathetic light. 

The media watchdog Ofcom has disclosed that it had opened an investigation into one of the programmes, Beat: Life on the Street — about the Government’s controversial Police Community Support Officers, to see whether it breached its broadcasting code."

As BOM readers will know, Bonkett's Numpties* in Yellow Jackets are a problem (see this blog). They were introduced as a cost cutting measure to replace real coppers, and when last sighted there were 13,400 of them. But they have nevercommanded public confidence - eg that appalling case when they reportedly left a boy to drown in a flooded gravel pit.

So to address this yawning credibility gap, the commissars decided to take the law into their own handsStretching Ofcom rules about transparency and editorial control to the max, taxpayers' money was used to fund extended propaganda films disguised as fly-on-the-flourescent-yellow-jacket documentaries. An outrage Uncle Joe would have been proud of.

The dark deed was masterminded by the government's propaganda ministry, the Central Office of Information (COI). They're so detached from what we think that they're actually proud of what they've done: a spokesperson says:
"Advertiser-funded programming has allowed the Government to successfully reach 22,804,675 people with important messages, such as those around tackling crime and disorder, or encouraging people to give blood. 

COI aims to help government departments communicate their services for citizens, achieving maximum communication effectiveness and value for money."

Important messages around... maximum communication effectiveness... services for citizens - this is the modern language of state control (although HTF they can know they've reached 22,804,675 people - rather than say, 22,804,674 - is beyond me).

The COI was established on the second day of WW2 as the Ministry of Information. It was our MiniTruth, and its mission was wartime propaganda. Fair enough - there was a war on. The trouble is, despite the passage of 60 years, the COI remains in the business of wartime propaganda: streams of ads on TV, radio, newspapers, and increasingly the internet, all telling us that unless we jolly well pull our socks up, Jerry will win.

And it's not cheap. Last year, central government propaganda cost us £400m, including £168m spent on traditional advertising - making the governmentBritain's second biggest advertiser, behind only Procter and Gamble. Here's the summary from COI's Annual Report:

As we can see, although the spend on traditional ads has apparently stabilised, spend elsewhere is roaring away. In particular, the amount spent on digital media is exploding, up more than tenfold in four years to £35m pa.

And remember too, the COI's £400m only covers direct central government propaganda. As the TaxPayers' Alliance reported a few months back, local councils spend huge amounts on their own "publicity", currently running at £450m pa. Add in money spent by local NHS authorities, local police forces etc etc, and we're talking a figure around £1bn pa.

So that's another £1bn pa George could use to cut taxes. At a stroke.

Yeah.

If only.

The news from the Tory MPs' holiday reading list is that the number one required read is:

"Nudge, the hit pop-psychology book by the Americans Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein. The authors’ argue that sometimes voters need a light push to do the right thing, a sentiment that chimes with Mr Cameron’s policies on welfare and tax."

We haven't yet read Nudge, but as we blogged here, that idea sounds horribly like nanny in a new set of clothes.

And Nudge's concept of "choice architecture" certainly sounds like extaordinarily good news for all those ad agencies who feast on taxpayers' wallets round at the COI.

We're grinding our teeth again (HTP Spokey).

PS Numpties or numties? Our original blog spelled it numties, which we lifted straight from a paper written by the Director of Kent Police College. But as commenters pointed out, that's totally wrong: the authorised BBC spelling isnumpties. Just goes to show you can't trust a Director of Kent Police College like an old time copper.

Labels: 

EU Brief.


UK Culture Secretary Issues Consultation Document on VOD Regulation
By itvtwp
The proposals are part of a comprehensive consultation on how the UK should implement the EU Audio Visual Media Services Directive, which includes various compulsory and optional elements, some of which are expected to result in new ...
itvt - http://blog.itvt.com


Hunters shoot down new regulations
Times of Malta - Valletta,Malta
European Commission officials had said, however, that the recommendation to extend trapping for certain species beyond the end of the year could not be ...

Click HERE for Glossary/ Definitions Session 2 Pharmaceutical ...
By Achyut(Achyut)
In 2002 the European Union took its first step towards harmonizing its clinical trial regulations, throughout its Member States, by conceiving the European Directive on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative ...

The Three Amigos


The Three Amigos
Both Republican Party Presidential candidate John McCain and Democrat Party Presidential candidate Barack Obama recently spoke at the annual convention of the National Council of La Raza. I'm sure most readers understand that "La Raza" is Spanish for "The Race." That McCain and Obama would pander before an organization such as La Raza indicates just how deeply both the Republican and Democrat parties are committed to appeasing the pro-illegal immigration forces.........
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin461.htm
by Chuck Baldwin