4. In the same book Obama said: “I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.” Further evidence that this “citizen of the world” may be a closet racist. For 20 years he attended the “God-damn-America” sermons of Jeremiah Wright.
Tuesday, 12 August 2008
Obama and  Israel’s Ruling  Elites
 Prof. Paul  Eidelberg
 Part I:  Obama
 1. Senator  Barack Obama uttered the dumbest statement of the century: “My friends,  we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you’ll join  with me as we try to change it.”   
 2.  Obama recently said in Berlin that he speaks not  only as an American citizen, but as a “citizen of the world.”  Is Obama in truth  a patriotic American?  After all, he refrained from putting his hand on his  heart when the Pledge of  Allegiance was recited in public.
 3. In Dreams of My  Father, he wrote: “I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age  of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself  to whites.”  This suggests that Obama is an anti-Caucasian “citizen of the  world.”
 4. In the same book Obama said: “I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.” Further evidence that this “citizen of the world” may be a closet racist. For 20 years he attended the “God-damn-America” sermons of Jeremiah Wright.
5. In Audacity of Hope Obama  wrote:   “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an  ugly direction.”  It seems Obama never learned that Muslims—to say nothing of  blacks—were preeminent in the African slave trade. 
 6. In his whirlwind visit to Israel , Obama revealed  abysmal ignorance of the region.  Alluding to the Six-Day War of 1967, when Israel , in a war of  self-defense, gained or regained Judea, Samaria , and the Golan  Heights . Obama admitted to Jerusalem  Post editor David  Horowitz that Israel might justify retaining parts of this land as a  security buffer, but, he added, “[the Israelis] got to consider whether getting  that buffer is worth the antagonism of the other party.”
 7. In these  words Obama revealed his fallacious assumption that the core of the Israel-Arab  conflict is territorial, not  ideological.  He  dismisses stark evidence that a large majority of the Arab Palestinians refuse  to accept Israel ’s existence in any borders.  A majority of these Arabs  supports suicide attacks  against the Jews.  They believe that to die when killing Jews is the greatest  good!  The Quran exalts the  Muslim who “slays and is slain” for Allah (Sura 9:111) . 
 8.  What shall we say of Arabs who use their children as  human bombs?  Daniel Pipes  said it would take at least two generations to overcome the murderous hatred of  these Arabs.  Is Obama unaware of former Muslims like Syrian-born Dr. Wafa Sultan, Sudanese-born Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and Egyptian-born  Nonie Darwish who  denounced Islam as uncivilized?
 9. Obama has chosen Middle East advisers like Zbigniev Brzezinski and  Lee Hamilton who trivialize  the theological nature of the Islamic threat confronting the United States .   Like any see-no-evil, hear-no-evil, and speak-no-evil pundit, he is incapable  addressing, realistically, the dangerous consequences of a precipitous American  retreat from Iraq and the  threat of a nuclear Iran .   Despite five years of futile negotiations with Iran , he advocates a  Chamberlain approach to Mahmoud  Ahmadinejad, the Hitler of Tehran.
 10. Posing as a “realist,” however, he would have the  U.S. refocus on Afghanistan  rather than on Iraq .  Hs preoccupation with imagery has trivialized his  mentality.  Unlike Afghanistan , a poor, landlocked nation, Iraq has enormous  oil resources and overlooks the sea lanes of the Persian Gulf .  If Iraq were to fall apart by a  premature US withdrawal, Iran would step in, and an axis of evil would be formed  encompassing Iran , Iraq , Syria , and a  Hezbollah-dominated Lebanon .   
 11. Does this would-be president understand that a  nuclear-armed Iran would dominate the Middle East as well as pacifist Europe on  which the economy and way of life of the United States ultimately depend?  But  what is to be expected of a neophyte who has been in the Senate only since 2005,  and has spent most of 2007 and 2008 running for president?  His lack of  experience in national and in international affairs makes him unfit to be President of the United States , the  most complex decision-making office on planet earth.
 12. What takes the place of experience in Obama is his  fluency or glibness.  Infatuated with his own oratory, his demagogic slogan  CHANGE, like his stupefying chant YES WE CAN, appeals to youth, to people  lacking knowledge of the adamant and harsh realities of international politics,  people mindless of history and the enormity of evil confronting  civilization,
 13. An Obama presidency would be a disaster for America  and Israel .
 Part II:  Israel’s Ruling Elites
 1.  In June 2005, Ehud Olmert told a New York  audience:  “We, we are tired of being courageous … we are tired of defeating our  enemies, we want … them to be our friends …”  No wonder Israel suffered a fiasco  a year later in the Second Lebanon  War!
 2. Olmert’s folly reminds us of  Shimon Peres, who once said  that by withdrawing from Judea and Samaria  , Israel will have more Ph.D.s per square kilometer—yes, and more idiots per  square kilometer.  Proof: Mr. Peres applied for Israel ’s membership in the  Arab League!   
 3. That Olmert is Israel ’s  prime minister and that Peres is Israel ’s president is indicative of a country  suffering from a terminal disease, as I will now show in another way.  
 4. According to sections 97, 99 and 100 of Israel Penal  Law, any official that surrenders or expresses the intention to surrender Jewish  land is prima facie guilty of treason.  This implicates Israel ’s last six prime ministers and dozens of  cabinet minister.  Yet no Knesset member has formally petitioned the Attorney General to have any of  these officials indicted for treason.  A commentary on the intellectual  integrity of MKs who pose as “Zionists.”
 5. Surely, these politicians could at least demand the  abrogation of the Oslo or Israel-PLO Agreement.  They know the PLO has violated  this agreement countless times.  What proof is needed after PLO chief Yasser Arafat openly waged war  against Israel in September 2000—a war that has resulted in the murder and  maiming of thousands of Jews by PLO terrorists.  Yet Israel ’s reputedly  rightwing politicians have not called for the abrogation of Oslo  !
 6. Unless reputedly Zionist parties like the Likud, Mafdal (the National Religious  Party), National Union, Israel Beiteinu publicly demand the  abrogation of Oslo  and reject an Arab Palestinian state, it is futile to call for their forming a  united bloc to liberate Israel from the tyranny of the Left.
 7. These same parties signed the coalition agreement of  the 2003 Sharon Government, which bound them to Oslo .  None has displayed the  courage of their Zionist convictions, else they would not support the idea of  submitting the fate of the Golan Heights and of Judea and Samaria to a national referendum.  Besides,  since when does a majority—even if it amounted to more than 80 percent have the  right to violate the unalienable rights  of a minority?  
 8.  How can any Zionist with a stitch of integrity  support a referendum that might result in the loss of Jewish land?  If Jews  dedicated to Eretz Israel lose  in that referendum, the government will have a democratic license to order  soldiers to expel men, women, and children from their homes, and the timid and  heartless among these soldiers will obey.   
 9.  The (incremental) exodus of 100,000 to 200,000 Jews  from Judea and Samaria will demoralize the country.  How many Jews will want to remain in  this country?  How many Jews will make aliya to a country now more than ever  exposed to missile attacks like Sderot?  
 10. As Jews leave, the percentage of Israel ’s Arab  citizens will increase.  The democratic  principle of one adult-one vote will bring more subversive Arabs into the  Knesset.  A national referendum, therefore, could be the coffin of the Jewish  state.  How ironic that this may happen under the façade of  democracy!
 _______________________
 *  Edited transcript of the Eidelberg Report, Israel National Radio, August 11,  2008.
Posted by
Britannia Radio
at
07:51














