Tuesday, 23 September 2008


Biased BBC
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
David Vance #

SOLID AND SERIOUS?

Today is going to be a key BBC day for promoting PM Gordon Brown as the only man who can help lead us out of the economic turbulence that, erm, he has led us into! I was entertained to hear a BBC reporter on the Labour conference declare this morning around 6.25am that the speech would be "solid and serious - just Gordon" Pass the sickbag but I this find of fawning over Brown nauseating. Since when did it become the role of a reporter to editorialise subjectively in this way? Where is the evidence to say Brown is in anyway "solid and serious"? The bias just oozes out of the BBC - they cannot help it and they will not stop it. That's why only thetotal removal of the license tax can deal with the problem we face with this aberrant and most biased broadcaster.

Labels: 

Comments: 37 (unread) - Biased BBC Home


Hugh #

General BBC-related comment thread! Please use this thread for comments about the BBC's current programming and activities. This post will remain at or near the top of the blog - scroll down for new topic-specific posts. N.B. This is not an invitation for general off-topic comments, rants or chit-chat. Thoughtful comments are encouraged. Comments may also be moderated. Any suggestions for stories that you might like covered would be appreciated! It's your space, use it wisely.

Labels: 

Comments: 46 (unread) - Biased BBC Home


David Vance #

SHARIA UK.

It's just bias that makes the BBC dangerous, it is the fact that the BBC quite happily promulgates ideas that undermine the very fundamentals of our British society, such as the law. Take this remarkable item, picked by B-BBC reader Miv Tucker on another thread, that British common law may owe much to Sharia law! Or at least that is what BBC reporter Mukul Devichand contemplates but then again he may be a tad biased? Those who press for the acceptance of Sharia in the UK can use this sort of programme to advance their cause and yet given the barbarity of Sharia, given the essential undemocratic nature of Sharia - isn't it revolting to see the State Broadcaster use our cash to churn out this pro-Islamic drivel?

Labels: 

Comments: 22 (unread) - Biased BBC Home


Hugh #

Is Paul Mason a supporter of the Socialist Workers Party?

That's the question being asked about the Newsnight economics editor over at Harry's PlaceI genuinely don’t know, is the rather worrying answer. The post continues:

What I do know is that last month, he took part in a meeting staged by the SWP front organisation “People Before Profit” alongside “SWP/Left Alternative supporter”, Graham Turner. His book was launched at the SWP bookshop. He spoke at the SWP conference in 2007.

It also notes that a lot of people - particularly on the left - supported extreme or silly causes in their youth, but as we've flagged up Mason is still quoting Che Guevara in middle age. And, as it says, the SWP is hardly harmless fun:

...in the past ten years [it] has devoted its energies to promoting speakers from Hamas and Hezbollah, lying about their genocidal racism, and promoting the viciously antisemitic Gilad Atzmon.

I do not think that a BBC journalist would participate in three events organised by the BNP or BNP front organisations. I am suprised that Newsnight’s Economic editor - of all things! - feels comfortable participating in SWP events.

I agree - well, apart from the bit about being surprised.

Comments: 5 (unread) - Biased BBC Home