Monday, 3 November 2008

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard sees the 'end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it' and 
doesn't like what he sees one little bit.  He seea buraucracy 
stifling all enterprise and wonders almost as an aside  "Does the UK 
still have a blocking minority under EU voting rules to stop a blitz 
of directives that could shut down half the activities of the City?   
I doubt it."   For make no mistake about it,  Brussels does not like 
the City one little bit and the sooner it can make it toe the neo-
socialist corporate line the better they will be pleased.

A.E-P.  prefers the  "enlightened "socialism" of Barack Obama any day 
over the Hegelian broth nearing the boil in Europe".   I hope he's 
right for Janet Daly in the same issue of the paper reminds us that  
the USA seems "about to choose as president the most inexperienced, 
untried, and unknowable (because there is so little to know) 
candidate who has ever run for that office at a time of 
unquantifiable international risk and unprecedented eeconomic 
instability."

xxxxxxxxxxx cs


TELEGRAPH   3.11.08
Revenge of the Left across the world

Whatever the exact result of the US elections tomorrow, we must 
assume that the whole governing machinery of Washington and the state 
capitols will soon be hostile to laissez-faire thinking.

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard


It is not just that the Democrats will win a crushing victory in both 
houses of Congress, perhaps reaching the 60-seat Senate threshold 
that lets them steam-roll legislation. It is also that the incoming 
class of 2008 is of a new creed. Many no longer believe - or actively 
reject - the free trade and free market catechisms.

As commentator Markos Moulitsas put it in Newsweek: "The big question 
is, will Democrats nationwide simply 'win' the night-or will they 
deliver an electoral drubbing so thorough that it signals the utter 
rejection of conservative ideology and kills the notion that America 
is a 'center-right' country?" he said.

No matter that statist policies were responsible for this global 
crisis in the first place. It was Western governments that set 
interest rates too low for too long, encouraging us all to abuse credit.

It was Eastern governments that held down their currencies to pursue 
mercantilist trade advantage, thereby accumulating vast foreign 
reserves that had to be recycled. Hence the bond bubble. This is the 
deformed creature known as Bretton Woods II. Protectionist Democrats 
are right to complain that the game is rigged. Free trade? Laugh on.

But at this point I have given up hoping that we will draw the right 
conclusions from this crisis. The universal verdict is that 
capitalism has run amok.

In any case the damage caused as credit retrenchment squeezes real 
industry is likely to be so great that Barack Obama may have to 
pursue unthinkable policies, just as Franklin Roosevelt had to ditch 
campaign orthodoxies and go truly radical after his landslide victory 
in 1932. Indeed, Mr Obama - if he wins - may have to start by 
nationalizing the US car industry.

For those who missed it, I recommend Edward Stourton's BBC interview 
with Eric Hobsbawm, the doyen of Marxist history.

"This is the dramatic equivalent of the collapse of the Soviet Union: 
we now know that an era has ended," said Mr Hobsbawm, still lucid at 91.
"It is certainly greatest crisis of capitalism since the 1930s. As 
Marx and Schumpeter foresaw, globalization not only destroys 
heritage, but is incredibly unstable. It operates through a series of 
crises.
"There'll be a much greater role for the state, one way or another. 
We've already got the state as lender of last resort, we might well 
return to idea of the state as employer of last resort, which is what 
it was under FDR. It'll be something which orients, and even directs 
the private economy," he said.

Dismiss this as the wishful thinking of an old Marxist if you want, 
but I suspect his views may be closer to the truth than the 
complacent assumptions so prevalent in the City.

To those who still think that business can go on as normal now that 
EU taxpayers have had to rescue the financial system, I can only say: 
what will happen to London if EU exchange controls are imposed, or if 
leverage is restricted by draconian laws - as demanded by the German, 
Dutch, and Nordic Left?

Does the UK still have a blocking minority under EU voting rules to 
stop a blitz of directives that could shut down half the activities 
of the City - or the 'Casino' as they say in Brussels? I doubt it.

Who thinks that the three key Commission posts - single market, 
competition, and trade - will still be held by free marketeers when 
the new team comes in next year?

In Germany, Oskar Lafontaine's Linke party now has 23pc support in 
Saarland on a Marxist pledge to nationalize banks and utilities. 
Needless to say, the Social Democrats (SPD) are shifting hard Left to 
protect their flank.
"The rule of the radical market ideology that began with Margaret 
Thatcher and Ronald Reagan has ended with a loud bang," said Frank-
Walter Steinmeier, Germany's foreign minister and SPD candidate for 
chancellor next year.

"We need a comprehensive new start, so we can reestablish our society 
on fresh foundations. People create value, not locusts,"  he said. 
['locusts" in Germany is the word used for 'hedge funds' -cs]

France has its own Gaullist version on this, seizing on the crisis to 
launch the most far-reaching strategy of state intervention since the 
1970s.
"Laissez-faire, c'est fini," said President Nicolas Sarkozy. "We will 
intervene massively whenever a strategic enterprise needs our money."

Such language can now be heard daily across Europe. It can only 
intensify as the fall-out from the EU's ?1.8bn trillion (£1.4 
trillion) bank rescue becomes clearer, and as Europe's élites 
discover that their own banks are the most leveraged in the world and 
have played their own Wagnerian part in Götterdammerung.

European and UK banks are five times more exposed to emerging markets 
than US banks. They alone hold the collective time-bomb of $1.6 
trillion (£990bn) in hard currency loans to Eastern Europe - now 
starting to detonate in Hungary, Ukraine, Romania, and even Russia.

At some point, Europe's political class will face the awful truth 
that their own credit bubbles are just as bad - and perhaps worse - 
than the excesses of US sub-prime property. As that occurs, the shock 
will move by degrees from revulsion to political rage.

Professor Hobsbawm, who spent his youth watching Hitler's rise in 
Berlin, has a warning for those who think this will help the Left in 
any recognizable form. "In the 1930s, the net political effect of the 
Depression was to enormously strengthen the Right," he said.

America was the great exception, as it may prove to be again. I for 
one will take the enlightened "socialism" of Barack Obama any day 
over the Hegelian broth nearing the boil in Europe..