The caravan moves on! Today the battle commences based on
yesterday's gamble with our futures.
To see a Rory Bremner video of : "Brown signs a deal with Satan" go
to :-
http://playpolitical.typepad.com/political_comedy/2008/11/brown-signs-
a-deal-with-satan.html
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx cs
========================
THE TIMES 25.11.08
Alistair Darling and George Osborne clash over £1 trillion debt gamble
Jenny Booth
The gulf between Labour and the Conservatives deepened this morning
as Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, defended his $20billion plan to
boost the economy as recession looms while George Osborne, the Shadow
Chancellor, derided it as a massive and unjustified gamble.
The pair went head to head in a round of radio and television
interviews, justifying their stance and trading blows from afar on
who would be worse off once tax rises to pay for the stimulus package
kick in.
Mr Darling said that it would be wrong to leave people to sink or
swim like the Tories did in the recessions of the 1980s and 1990s -
while Mr Osborne said that saddling the nation with £1 trillion of
debt would hold back any future economic recovery.
"I think there was a big intake of breath by the nation when they
realised what the cost of the last 10 years was and that we are all
saddled with a truly huge debt," Mr Osborne told BBC Radio 4.
Minutes later, Mr Darling told the same programme: "I'm not prepared
to just let the recession take its course. In the 1980s and 1990s
people paid a high price for that, and I'm not prepared to go down
that road again."
Mr Osborne claimed that lower and middle income families earning
£19,000 or more would be worse off after a 0.5 per cent rise in
National Insurance takes effect in 2011, but Mr Darling retorted that
the Tories had got their sums wrong and that only people earning more
than £100,000 would be affected.
The increase in the personal tax-free allowance for everyone earning
less than £100,000 would make up for the higher NI contributions, Mr
Darling said.
Questioned on the Today programme, he accused the programme of
"running the Tory line", and insisted: "You have to look at the
changes across the entire tax system."
Mr Darling acknowledged that, to pay for his fiscal measures, public
borrowing would balloon to £118 billion in the next financial year,
way above the £38 billion he forecast in March. But he brushed aside
any suggestion that the British government was saddling itself with
more debt than the economy could bear.
Asked if markets could absorb the additional gilts supply caused by
his expanded borrowing, he said: "I'm confident we have made the
right judgement, and the government can meet all its objectives and
obligations."
The Conservatives have also complained that the House of Commons will
not have an opportunity to discuss Mr Darling's fiscal stimulus
package for more than a week, as Parliament is due to rise on
Thursday and not return until the Queen's Speech on December 3.
[They should not be surprised at this. Brown treats parliament as an
unnecessary irrelevance and sends it away on holiday whenever he can -
cs]
========================
TELEGRAPH Blog 25.11.08
Euro membership now impossible until at least 2014
Posted By: Edmund Conway
If there's one thing to be said for the atrocious public finance
figures in the pre-Budget report it is that at least they will
prevent us from joining the euro. There had been talk in recent weeks
about Britain finally embracing the single currency, as sterling
slumped to new lows against other world currencies and the plight of
the UK economy took a general turn for the worse. Leaving aside the
wisdom (or to be precise the utter lack thereof) in such a
suggestion, following the PBR I doubt the euro members would even
have us anymore.
Two of the strictures of euro membership are that a member country's
budget deficit should not exceed 3pc of gross domestic product and
that national debt should be below 60pc of GDP. The UK had been
comfortably below these levels for most of the past few years, give
or take the occasional budget deficit just above 3pc. However, under
the new figures presented by the Treasury yesterday, we will remain
ineligible for entry all the way through to 2014 or later.
They show that, after leaping to an unprecedented 8pc of GDP next
year our annual budget deficit will remain well above 3pc all the way
through to 2013/14, while the UK's total government indebtedness will
smash through the European-recommended ceiling, rising from 43.2pc to
68.5pc by 2013/14 (this is calculated on a Maastricht basis which
measures gross government debt).
According to Stephen Lewis of Monument Securities: "With UK public
finances running along current lines, it is doubtful whether present
euro zone members would relish the prospect of UK inclusion in the
zone. The danger that the UK would wreck the euro as it came so near
to wrecking the [European Exchange Rate Mechanism] in 1992 would
probably outweigh the political attractions of such an arrangement."
========================
TELEGRAPH 25.11.08
Darling's over-optimism misses the mark
The traditional criteria for judging budgets (and pre-budgets) have
gone out of the window in the present crisis.
By Vince Cable, Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman
A massive banking crisis and the nationalisation or part-
nationalisation of banks has made the concept of public borrowing and
debt increasingly difficult to define meaningfully. There are also
few reliable benchmarks for judging whether governments are too timid
or too reckless until after the event. We have the history of the
1930s and, more recently, Japan. But the truth is that the Government
is largely flying blind - and in very dangerous weather.
There are two interconnected problems which the pre-Budget statement
was designed to address. One is to counter the squeeze on the economy
resulting from the contraction in credit in the wake of the - global
- banking crisis. The recapitalisation of the banks was a necessary
step but, so far, there is no sign of any revival, or even
stabilisation, of "normal" lending. The second is the onset of
recession triggered by the collapse of the grossly inflated UK
housing market and by a generalised deterioration in consumer and
business confidence.
What we now see unfolding is a deep recession, almost certainly
deeper and longer than those official forecasts of a 1.25pc GDP
decline next year followed by a rapid recovery in 2010.
The headline story is of a big increase in Government borrowing to
around 8pc of GDP. This is what happened during the last recession
under the Conservative government. Government borrowing is bound to
rise during a recession. But the problems now are deeper. The
Government's own figures show that even if there is early economic
recovery and tight control of public spending, the public finances
will be in seriously bad shape for half a decade or more.
But, in the short run, a stimulus is required to stop the downward
spiral in confidence, deepening recession and growing unemployment.
My worry is that there will be no early recovery mainly because there
is now a deep structural problem in the banking system.
The banking crisis has left the banks disabled and unable, or
unwilling, to maintain the flow of lending. [But in fact the BBA
claims that lent MORE not less to small businesses in October. ??? -
cs] Enormous numbers of small and medium sized companies are having
their credit lines cut, or made prohibitively expensive. When
companies cannot pay their wages, they close - adding to the
unemployed and worsening the demand spiral in the economy. To put
this problem in perspective, Barclays has a balance sheet twice the
size of the entire Government debt, and Royal Bank of Scotland is
even bigger.
RBS has agreed to maintain lending flows to small companies but
Barclays is severely cutting back and it will cut back even more
after accepting large sums of money on extortionate terms from Arab
institutions [in fact after tax the terms of 14% reduce to below
government recapitalisation terms of 12% -cs] . The Government has
already put massive amounts of taxpayers' money into bank
recapitalisations and guarantees. It must now ensure that promises to
maintain lending flows are kept; otherwise the fiscal stimulus will
be wiped out several times over.
The main tax cutting proposal - a small, temporary VAT reduction is
not well targeted and consumers will realise that the tax cut will be
claimed back from them in a couple of years time. That is why my
party would much prefer a permanent tax cut aimed at low and middle
income tax payers: a cut in the basic rate of income tax or lifting
low earners out of tax altogether or both. The Government's planned
£16 billion tax cut could have paid for a 4p in the pound income tax
cut or its equivalent in increased thresholds. We now know that it
will be paid for mainly by middle income families on incomes of as
low as £19,000 a year on higher National Insurance. [Darling
contradicted Osborne when he said this would happen . So the LibDem
spokesman agrees with the Shadow chancellor -cs]
As for the 45p tax rate on incomes over £150,000, this is largely a
token gesture. It will raise very little revenue and misses a major
opportunity to rebalance the tax system in favour of greater
fairness. The real issue, as any tax accountant knows, is that few
really high earners pay anything like a marginal 40pc at the moment
because of the generous reliefs and avoidance opportunities. It makes
much more sense to tackle, for example, the glaring gap between top
rates on income and capital gains tax, as Mrs Thatcher, and Nigel
Lawson did in the late 1980s, or the extraordinarily generous
treatment of very large pension pots.
My other major worry about the Government's package is that there
will be little to show for all the borrowing. If the government's
balance sheet is to be used to support the economy there should be
long term public investment. The obvious area is housing. At present
there is very little housing being built, social or private; the
house construction industry is in desperate straights; and prices are
plummeting. The government could, and should, mobilise the housing
associations and councils to acquire land at present, heavily
discounted, prices to move ahead with affordable housing projects
which provide an economic stimulus and meet a real need. The
Government has some ambitious rhetoric but very little is actually
happening
I fear that this recession will be deeper, longer and nastier than
the Government believes. We face a long, hard, painful grind.
========================
CONSERVATIVE HOME Blog 25.11.08
How the sketchwriters saw it
"It was a Christmas play like no other. Alistair Darling had cast
himself as Santa Claus. This was, to say the least, a challenge for a
man who is more wooden than Pinocchio's nose. Still, he came dressed
for the part, his hair as white as the North Pole and clutching a
brand-new socialist swagbag of goodies for all." - Ann Treneman in
The Times
--------------------------------------
"Boring? Alistair Darling? Yesterday Britain's dreariest functionary
had a swagger to him, a jaunty, hat-doffing, stick-twirling, marching
down the prom quality. He looked like the man who broke the bank - if
not at Monte Carlo, at least the one in Threadneedle Street." - Simon
Hoggart in The Guardian
--------------------------------------
"While Mr Darling was on his feet, a group of four Tory frontbenchers
- George Osborne, David Cameron, Oliver Letwin and on the bench
behind them, David Gauke - conferred between themselves like a group
of contestants on University Challenge who are confident they have
the intellectual edge. When Mr Osborne rose to offer us the results
of their deliberations, he proceeded to demolish Mr Darling." -
Andrew Gimson in the Daily Telegraph
--------------------------------------
"Fifty-five minutes it took but a half-competent sub-editor would
have boiled it down to two words: 'Abandon ship!' Things are dire.
Gordon Brown kept rocking to and fro, hugging himself like one of
those orphans in Romania." - Quentin Letts in the Daily Mail
--------------------------------------
"David Cameron sat there looking palpably anxious. Lips furled in.
Brow knotted; or knitted possibly. George Osborne - his pale Regency
features like a nasty Keats - sat beside him knowing his future
depended on the next 90 seconds. Without a cheer in the first minute
he'd be lost." - Simon Carr in The Independent
========================
IN BRIEF 25.11.08
==Debt to reach levels greater than in wake of Second World War
Britain will borrow more than £400 billion over the next five years,
as the total stock of accumulated Government debt will peak at 57 per
cent of GDP in 2013/14. (Telegraph)
== King says banks may need more capital
Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England, praised the £20bn
government stimulus package but warned the 'single most pressing
challenge' was to break the logjam in lending (FT)
==Mortgage approvals halve in a year
Mortgage approvals fell by more than half from a year earlier in
October, according to data from the British Bankers' Association,
which underlined the extreme pressure on the housing market (FT)
== Central and E Europe's growth forecast slashed
The global credit crisis is forcing a rapid slowdown in economic
growth in the ex-Communist states of central and eastern Europe
particularly in countries dependent on international financial flows,
says the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development - (FT)
==OECD forecasts four quarters of contraction
The US and eurozone are poised to suffer four consecutive quarters of
contracting output that will not end until the middle of 2009,
according to the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and
Development's latest forecast (FT)
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
Posted by Britannia Radio at 21:48