Debt collection tactics come under scrutiny
• Government may consider  crackdown on agencies
• Minister reveals concerns ahead of Guardian  debate
* Rupert Jones and Phillip Inman
* guardian.co.
* The Guardian, Tuesday November 18  2008
Debt collection firms may face a government crackdown amid concern  about
the "aggressive" tactics used by some, such as chasing the wrong  people
and refusing to deal with debt advisory services.
Gareth  Thomas, the consumer minister, told the Guardian he had summoned
the debt  collection industry's main trade body to a meeting to discuss
these issues.  Speaking on the eve of the Guardian's first Debt Debate in
central London  today, Thomas indicated it was too early to say what the
outcome may be, but  that it could include enforcement action by the
Office of Fair Trading or  changes to legislation.
It is the latest government move designed to ease  the impact of the
credit crunch on homeowners and businesses.
This  year the OFT said it had seen a "marked increase" in complaints
about the  activities of debt collectors, while concern has been
expressed that the  worsening economic climate could see banks, card
companies and firms that  have bought debts toughen their stance towards
those with repayment  problems.
Thomas cited the case of Beryl Brazier, a great-grandmother  who
committed suicide in 2006 over mistaken debt demands. Brazier, who  had
arrears of about £500 on a loan, began to receive letters demanding  she
repay £17,000 after a database firm mistakenly linked her home with  the
name of a man who lived 200 miles away.
His debt was sold in 2005  to Thames Credit, which continued to request
repayment of the loan via  letters. After Brazier sent it £500 with a
letter saying she would repay the  rest, she took her own life.
The minister has requested a meeting with  Kurt Obermaier, executive
director of the Credit Services Association (CSA),  whose members have
some 20m debt cases worth £15bn referred to them annually.  Thomas said
the three key areas that would be discussed were:
•  Tracing problems. Errors can creep into the process when firms attempt
to  find debtors who have moved.
• "Aggressive/
unreasonable times or repeatedly phoning them at  work; resorting to
using documentation "that looks like it has the weight of  the courts
behind it"; referring to "extreme solutions" such as county  court
judgments and bailiffs, and refusing to deal with debt advice  agencies.
• Disputed debts. This can involve people being chased for  debts that
are not theirs and cases where the person contests the claim -  for
example, over the amount.
"We are not saying members of the CSA  are responsible for all those, but
through the CSA we are keen to talk to the  industry more generally. To
be fair, most of the industry is  responsible,
was "perfectly reasonable to  expect people to have to repay debts".
The outcome may simply be an  information exercise aimed at ensuring
companies are aware of their  responsibilities. However, he added: "We
may need to do more on the  enforcement side, or it may be there are
legal changes required."
In  April, the OFT warned 13 companies about their debt collection
strategy after  complaints of unfair practices.
A CSA spokesman said: "We have been in  correspondence with Gareth Thomas
and have been encouraged by his  understanding of the issues and
challenges that we face."
http://www.guardian
consumer-affairs
Tuesday, 18 November 2008
Posted by
Britannia Radio
at
19:08














