George and Dave
Osborne is like Mandelson, says Jackie Ashley. He is both a strategic genius, a boy wonder of the black arts, and a still-naive, rather childish figure who likes to hobnob with the rich. The wider issue is that the Tories have not been able to articulate a simple and compelling analysis of the crisis. The best they can come up with is that it's all Brown's fault for spending so much money in the past decade, spending that at the time the Tories mostly supported. Osborne is the whipping boy for a much wider failure of philosophy and politics. In a leader-dominated party that is the fault of one man. It is time to turn the spotlight not on George, but on George's best friend. Jackie Ashley The Guardian
Full article: In a crisis calling for big ideas, Osborne is woefully lacking
The Mole: Churlish Mandy accuses his Tory yachting buddy of 'irresponsibility'
The rapid rise of Cameron and Osborne caused resentment among slightly older MPs - and some of it survives, says Bruce Anderson. In Mr Cameron's case, that does not matter. He has stamped his authority on the party. But Mr Osborne has become the focal point for youth-ist resentments. One can understand why. In an ideal world, the Shadow Chancellor would look older. In these chippy times, it would help if he had a different accent. Cameron is standing firmly by him, but the next few days are crucial. Everyone is preparing for the Brown package. There will be an almighty political battle, and if Mr Osborne does not secure at least a draw, the doubts will grow while the grumbling increases. Bruce Anderson The Independent
Full article: To silence his Tory critics, Osborne must do more. Now
Tax cut turnaround
If only the Tories had dared to call for tax cuts long ago, says Janet Daley. Their clothes have been stolen and are being worn, ill-fitting and hastily altered but attractive nonetheless, by their opponents. It is Gordon Brown who is preaching, in what must be the most bizarre epiphany in political history, that tax cuts actually stimulate economic growth. Somehow the Tories have ended up as the guardians of Brownian 'fiscal responsibility' while allowing Labour to become born-again tax cutters. But they still have an opportunity, for Mr Brown's 'cuts' will be limited to the very lowest paid which will have little impact on the economy. He will not offer what in the US seems self-evidently necessary: middle class tax cuts. Janet Daley Daily Telegraph
Full article: Tories must offer middle class tax cuts
Brown out of order
The attempts this weekend by the Prime Minister and his Chancellor to portray Mr Osborne as, at best, a wartime blabbermouth whose loose lips risk sinking our economic ship and, at worst, some kind of unpatriotic subversive out to wreck Britannia, smack more of the Russian Duma than of open debate, says a Times Leader. It echoed the way Brown accused Mr Cameron last week of playing politics with the Baby P tragedy. The Prime Minister cannot hide under the skirts of the 'national interest' to quash reasonable concerns about the economy and social care. Leader The Times
Full article: Sterling Behaviour
Means testing is good
An irrational aversion to means testing has made the welfare state wasteful, writes Libby Purves. It leads to countless illogicalities, from free bus passes for elderly millionaires to child benefit for yummy-mummies wearing Prada. The same squeamishness torpedoes sensible reforms like imposing modest 'hotel charges' on richer hospital patients. That would have pumped millions into the NHS. When government and the Chartered Institute of Housing cautiously talk about reviewing council tenancies, there is an outcry. One paper wailed that it would "penalise those who try to better their circumstances". But the system always 'penalises' everybody who earns a bit more. It's called income tax. Libby Purves The Times
Full article: There is nothing mean about a means test
Dashed hopes
The playwright David Hare's disillusion with the Blair era is unsurprising, says Peter Preston. Avowedly progressive politicians always seem to disappoint their constituencies. Is it that they're not good enough, any of them? Or that we always expect too damned much? It's no coincidence that the leaders still most revered in their own political habitats over half a century - Thatcher, Reagan - are figures from the right, people who set simple benchmarks and retire more or less intact. The left and the slippery centre embrace no such certainties. They can never be satisfied. It won't be too long before Obama gets the treatment, too. Maybe David Hare has already got some elegant riff on Othello scribbled on a pad. Peter Preston The Guardian
Full article: The paucity of hope
Rachel Johnson: Gethsemane and Blair