The groundswell of anger mounts all the time. In fact the only
person seriously out of step is Richard North in his usually
excellent blog EUReferendum.
He is completely wrong in every possible aspect of the case and also
seems to be not in tune with facts. Firstly he seems to pretend
that the treatment of the 'whistleblower' is the focal point of
complaint. Most reports accept that he was at fault and deserved
internal disciplinary action. Indeed Green himself suggested that
Galley should see his lawyer while at the same time refusing to
speak with him. But what both got was the full force of the counter-
terrorism unit brought down on the case although the only breach of
security was contained in government failure which Green sent to the
press. The Director of Public Prosecutions did NOT authorise any
action. The only authorisation came from the Assistant Commissioner
in charge of Counter-Terrorism, but we do not know who referred a
disciplinary matter to him as worth considering.
North, in the meanwhile, spends much effort on his blog saying how
useless parliament has become but now says Green shouldn't have told
the press. You can't win with North. Green clearly thought that
parliament was an ineffectual forum so told the press instead. You
would have thought that North might have welcomed him as a convert.
NO! He condemns him for taking effective action over the only threat
to national security around - the near-criminal neglect of its
responsibilities by the Home Secretary by allowing 5,000 illegal
immigrants to work as security personnel. The Counter-Terrorism unit
should have been after her. But no. The Police have become an
instrument of state oppression and are enjoying the role.
Then there is the question of maintaining the independence and
integrity of MPs. We had a civil war in the 17th century over that
and it has taken 300 or more years to forget that lesson it seems.
The Speaker has been exposed as at least incompetent in his task if
not deliberately partisan. The Police overstepped the boundaries of
their permitted actions.
Richard North can get get hot under the collar if the local fuzz deal
strictly with him, but he cannot see the nature of the attack being
mounted on our civil liberties. The LibDems can; Blunkett can; Tony
Benn can; the Director of Liberty can and most of the press can.
Shame on that blog. Maybe it has outlived its usefulness?
xxxxxxxxxx cs
Sunday, 30 November 2008
Posted by Britannia Radio at 21:53