Iraq war 'violated rule of law'
Legal advice given to Tony Blair by the attorney general prior to the
Iraq war was fundamentally "flawed," a former law lord has claimed.
Lord Bingham said Lord Goldsmith had given Mr Blair "no hard evidence"
that Iraq had defied UN resolutions "in a manner justifying resort to
force".
Therefore, the action by the UK and US was "a serious violation of
international law," Lord Bingham added.
Lord Goldsmith said he stood by his advice to the then prime minister.
The Liberal Democrats say that Lord Bingham's comments made a full
public inquiry "unavoidable" into the decision to invade Iraq.
Responding to Lord Bingham's criticism, Lord Goldsmith insisted the
invasion of Iraq was legal.
"I would not have given that advice if it were not genuinely my view,"
he said.
'No weapons'
Lord Bingham made his comments in a speech on the rule of law at the
British Institute of International and Comparative Law in London.
He referred to a written parliamentary statement made by Lord Goldsmith
on 17 March 2003 in which he confirmed that war on Iraq would be legal
on the grounds of existing UN resolutions.
Lord Bingham said: "This statement was flawed in two fundamental
respects.
Many nations other than ours took part in the action and did so
believing that they were acting lawfully
Lord Goldsmith
Former attorney general
"It was not plain that Iraq had failed to comply in a manner justifying
resort to force and there were no strong factual grounds or hard
evidence to show that it had.
"Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors had found no weapons of
mass destruction, were making progress and expected to complete their
task in a matter of months."
Lord Bingham also criticised Lord Goldsmith for failing to make clear
that only the UN Security Council could judge whether there had been
compliance and, if appropriate, authorise further action.
"If I am right that the invasion of Iraq by the US, the UK and some
other states was unauthorised by the Security Council there was, of
course, a serious violation of international law and of the rule of
law," he said.
Lord Goldsmith said his critic was "entitled to his own legal
perspective"
"But at the time and since then many nations other than ours took part
in the action and did so believing that they were acting lawfully," he
said.
He also said the UN resolution that Iraq was deemed to have defied -
1441 - did not need further determination by the Security Council.
Lord Chancellor Jack Straw backed Lord Goldsmith, arguing that his
advice "was shared by many member states across the world".
This is a damning condemnation of what was an unjustified
invasion
Nick Clegg, Lib Dem leader
"I do not accept Lord Bingham's conclusions, which do not, I am afraid,
take proper account of the text of Security Council Resolution 1441 nor
its negotiating history," Mr Straw said.
But Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg said Lord Bingham's claims made a full
public inquiry into the government's decision to go to war
"unavoidable"
"Lord Bingham's stature means that his devastating criticism cannot just
be brushed under the carpet," Mr Clegg said.
"This is a damning condemnation of what was an unjustified invasion
which we now know to have flouted international law."
Former lord chief justice Lord Bingham retired from the bench in July.
Lord Goldsmith stepped down from his post as attorney general last year.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.
Published: 2008/11/18 07:53:13 GMT
Tuesday, 18 November 2008
Posts
