Friday 19 December 2008

OUT-LAW.COM: IT & e-commerce legal help from international law firm Pinsent Masons

Hi, this is your last weekly round-up from OUT-LAW for 2008. (As always, there are plenty of other stories from this week. You can also access our archive of weekly emails). We'll be back on 5th January. Have a happy holiday.

This week's news on OUT-LAW.COM

UK will save its 48-hour opt-out, says employment lawyer

The European Parliament has voted to end the UK's opt-out of laws banning people from working for more than 48 hours a week, but a leading employment lawyer has said that the opt-out is likely to remain in place.
17/12/2008

Elton John loses landmark irony libel case

A spoof newspaper diary which claimed that Elton John's fundraising efforts were principally designed to give him a chance to meet other celebrities and engage in self-promotion was not libellous, the High Court has ruled.
17/12/2008

ISP can use unfair practices law to back unlawful interference claim, rules judge

An internet service provider (ISPs) can use an alleged breach of new laws on unfair commercial practices, laws that it has no powers to enforce directly, as the basis of a common law claim of 'unlawful interference', the High Court has ruled.
17/12/2008

UK consults on copyright reform

The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) is asking whether laws on copyright exceptions and the current system for rights clearance are too complicated. A consultation on reforming the regime was published today.
16/12/2008

British Standard explains how to store data for use as evidence

A new British Standard has been published that aims to maximise the evidential weight of electronic information held by companies. BS 10008 sets out requirements for data management in companies to ensure the integrity of information.
15/12/2008

Why an emoticon won't get a trade mark in the EU :-(

A Russian businessman says that he has trade marked the emoticon and that commercial uses of punctuation marks to convey a wink will require a licence costing over $10,000. A trade mark attorney said that his demands will be irrelevant to uses in the EU.
15/12/2008