Self Restraint (with an Epilog)
Prof . Paul Eidelberg
U . S . Admiral Bull Halsey, a rational and responsible man, said, “Hit hard, hit fast, hit often . ” Rationality and responsibility are qualities quite foreign to those who shape Israel ’s policy toward its enemy, the Palestinian Authority . Their policy is “Hit softly, hit slowly, and hit seldom . ”
In Hebrew this policy is called “havlaga”—self-restraint . This policy is motivated by fear of world opinion, perhaps also by the desire to display Israel ’s moral superiority vis-à-vis the cruelty of her Arab enemies . It is an utterly inane and immoral policy .
Havlaga prolongs the war . It therefore increases the number of Jewish as well as Arab casualties . But let me focus on the character of the government that pursues this policy of havlaga—so sickeningly obvious in its failure to retaliate against the constant bombing of Sderot by the Arabs in Gaza ,
This craven policy reveals the government’s lack of heartfelt concern for the lives of Jews . Paradoxical as it may seem, this government policy of havlaga undermines the sanctity of human life . It encourages the enemy and increases Arab—indeed, the world’s—contempt for Israel . Havlaga is a vile policy, and its proponents must be deemed bungled or base human beings .
Yet this has been the policy of Israeli prime ministers and their cohorts since the signing of the Israel-PLO Agreement of September 1993 . How demoralizing, how revolting!
And yet, not a single party in the Knesset protests against this cowardly and self-destructive policy . Even the religious parties, which proclaim the principle of pikuach nefesh—saving life—say nothing about havlaga’s danger to Jewish life . The religious parties are the most culpable .
The Rabbis of old taught us that “Whoever is merciful to the cruel, will ultimately be cruel to the merciful . ” Hence we should expect the religious parties to denounce the policy of havlaga—loudly and repeatedly . They should expose the irrationality of such concepts as “collateral damage” and “proportionality” when fighting against a genocidal enemy—a satanic enemy, as witness how Muslims tortured before murdering Jews in Mumbai.
The Rabbis should say, “Hit hard, hit fast, and hit often . ” But this would appear “unJewish” and “immoral . ” Yet Rabbi Judah Halevi said: “With whatever is at hand, you shall kill . ”
King Solomon said, “To everything there is a season … a time for war and a time for peace . ” Each time has its own laws . There are laws for war, and there are laws for peace . Havlaga is not one of the laws of war .
Consider the verse, “When you go forth to battle against your enemies” (Deut . 20:1) . The Sages ask: “What is meant by ‘against your enemies’”? They answer: “God said, ‘Confront them as enemies . Just as they show you no mercy, so should you not show them any mercy’” (Tanchuma, Shoftim 15).
Israel ’s greatest monarch King David said: “I have pursued mine enemies and overtaken them . Neither did I withdraw till they were consumed . I have smitten them through, so that they are not able to rise; they are fallen under my feet . For Thou has girded me with strength unto the battle . Thou hast subdued under me those that rose up against me . Thou hast also made mine enemies turn their backs unto me, and I did cut off them that hate me . … Then did I beat them small as the dust before the wind; I did cast them out as the mire of the streets” (Psalms 18:38-43) .
These words may seem cruel to effete, overly civilized Jews . They would rather Jews be the victims than the victors of war—the less to worry about anti-Semitism, or so they foolishly think . How many Jews have been murdered, how many Jewish children have been made orphans, how many Jewish men, women, and children have been crippled for life, how many Jewish families have suffered so horribly because of this senseless, cowardly, and futile policy of havlaga?
And how many Jews (as well as Arabs) would be alive today had the government of Israel pursued a cruel but quick and decisive war against the Palestinian Authority before the PA could accumulate so many weapons and indoctrinate a gene ration of Arab children to hate and kill Jews?
The Jewish people are known (even by their enemies) for their kindness and mercy—which is why Arabs store weapons in hospitals and schools and shield themselves behind women and children . In time of war, however, “do not show [your enemy] any pity” (Deut . 7:17), on which verse the Ramban comments: “Through the mercy of fools all justice is lost . ”
Justice, justice, is what Israel stands for: justice has ever been the sacred cause of the Jewish people . Today, however, inasmuch as Israeli governments display no confidence in the justice of Israel ’s cause, is it any wonder that the Jew-haters of this world now question whether Israel has a right to exist, indeed, call for Israel ’s eradication?
Epilog
Having written above about the government’s cowardly policy of havlaga toward Arab terrorists, contrast its cruel but still cowardly policy toward Jews, for example in Gush Katif, Amona, and now in Hebron where the police brutally attacked and injured the gallant mother of six, Nadia Matar. Consider, too, the government’s failure to protect the lives of Jews in Sderot from constant bombing by Gaza-based Arab terrorists. It should be obvious to any candid observer that this government has forfeited its legitimacy. Indeed, it is hardly an exaggeration to say it has become the enemy of the Jewish people. Therefore, since the opposition parties do nothing to topple this government, the people must act as the opposition, but one not paralyzed by the policy of havlaga.
========================================
TIME FOR ISRAEL AND AMERICA TO
END THEIR POLICY OF RESTRAINT
By Bernard J. Shapiro
(Original version written in 1994)
"He who is merciful when he should be cruel will in the end be cruel when he should be merciful."...Midrash Samuel (Jewish rabbinic text from early Middle Ages)
From the very early days of the Haganah and continuing with the emerging Israel Defense Forces (IDF), there was a policy of self-restraint or havlagah. This policy mandated that defenders could only return fire, hold their positions, and never to engage in counter-terror. This policy was based on the false premise that the Arab masses did not support the war against the Yishuv (the Jewish population before independence) and then the State of Israel and would be brought into the conflict if Israeli forces were too aggressive.
There were some good and practical reasons for restraint in the early days. There was legitimate fear that the British would cut off immigration if the Jews were to go on the offensive against the Arabs. Havlagah was essentially a Haganah (Labor/Socialist) policy and many supporters of Jabotinsky's Revisionist Zionist movement broke off from them to form fighting units (Irgun Zvai Leumi and Stern) unrestrained by that policy.
The modern IDF was dominated by Labor and quickly adopted the policy of restraint and the concept of "purity of arms" as its official doctrine. The later reinforced the former by adding that a soldier should never have to obey an illegal order to commit some atrocity. The enemy, including prisoners of war, should be treated with dignity and civilian populations should be spared as much harm as possible, even if this causes greater Israeli casualties. There was some flexibility in this strict moral code.
This policy of restraint may have been practical during the pre-state days and even during the early years of Israeli independence. These periods were characterized by weakness and relative dependence on foreign goodwill. Following the Six Day War in 1967, the need for havlagah decreased and the damage it caused began to become more evident. Israel became the preeminent power in the Middle East, yet failed to grasp the strategic opportunities that came with such dominance. Here are some of the historical highlights of the failed policy of restraint:
1. Following the Six Day War (1967) and the capture of Jerusalem, Moshe Dayan turned over control of Judaism's most sacred place, the Temple Mount, to Moslem authorities. He did it to appease their sensibilities to the Israeli capture of the city. Jewish rights were ignored to please the defeated Arabs, who had plotted our destruction. Dayan also prevented a mass exodus of Arabs from YESHA, which ultimately led to the problems we face today.
2. During the War of Attrition with Egypt (1969-70), the Israeli forces adopted primarily a defensive posture. They built a system of bunkers (The Bar Lev Line) along the Suez Canal. Israeli soldiers were heavily pounded daily by Egyptian artillery. Finally they began to use aircraft to strike targets deep into Egypt. The policy of restraint kept them from striking anything but military and minor economic targets. Israeli soldiers died because the government was inhibited from causing Egypt 'real' pain.
3. The Yom Kippur War of 1973 is a classic example of restraint run amok. Israeli military intelligence did not fail to recognize the approaching danger as has been the common account. In fact, Israel's leaders made the political decision not to utilize the great power of the IDF to crush the Egyptian and Syrian armies that they KNEW were planning to attack. Thousands of Israeli soldiers died needlessly.
4. The Camp David Accord with Egypt was another example of the failure to exert Israeli power. The oil fields of Sinai would have given Israel economic independence from America. The cost of redeployment from Sinai placed Israel in almost permanent debt to American diplomacy (often pro-Arab). Did Israel achieve anything worthwhile at Camp David? I think not and believe history will bear me out. Egypt has become one of the most ant-Semitic and hostile Arab countries in the world. As a result of Camp David, the Egyptian army now threatens Israel, having been equipped with the most modern American weapons.
5. During the War in Lebanon (1982), the IDF reached Beirut and then failed to complete the destruction of the PLO. Our enemies were allowed to escape and prepare to fight another day. Why didn't the Israeli Navy sink the ships loaded with PLO troops (including Arafat) as they fled Beirut? RESTRAINT!
6. In 1987 the intifada began and the Israeli forces showed great restraint and thus were incapable of crushing it. Of course, Israel received no credit in the Western media for such restraint. The failure to defeat this uprising began a process of demoralization among the Israeli population.
7. The Persian Gulf War (1991) and the SCUD attacks on Israel led to further demoralization. The failure to adequately respond to Iraq's aggression and the humiliating sealed rooms, led to a rapid decline in Israeli morale and desire to defend itself. More and more Israelis began to feel impotent, weak and fatigued with the continuous battle for survival. The Oslo Accords were the logical outcome of this depression and feeling that they could not sustain the struggle.
8. The Oslo Accords (1993) were the ultimate failure of the policy of restraint. Israel like America actually was very powerful. The IDF was unequaled in the Middle East while the US was the most powerful nation in the world. Yet despite this power, Israel's leaders, were ready to grant equal status to a band of murderers and ultimately create a state of "Palestine" which would challenge its right to the Land and its capital of Jerusalem.
9. Israeli forces in Lebanon should have been given a free hand to 'punish' all those who facilitate attacks on them including Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. There should be no more agreements that tie Israeli hands.
The damage caused by havlagah (restraint) has been immense and it far past time to reverse that policy. Americans have been viciously attacked in Africa, Yeman, and Saudia Arabia. The attempt to try to criminalize terrorism has been a dreadful mistake. Terrorism is sponsored by states who allow their territory and funds to help the organization of terrorist. The Oslo agreement allowed Arafat to set up terrorist headquarters near Israel's heartland. From there he sent terrorists to attack Israel.With plausible deniability he claims "he is not responsible."
Dr. Aaron Lerner of the Independent Media Review & Analysis in Israel reports that Palestinians are celebrating attacks against USA across the West Bank Israel Radio reported this afternoon that young Palestinians across the West Bank are celebrating the terrorist attacks against the USA - waving Palestinian flags and handing out candy. There are reports of shooting in some places but it is not clear if it is Palestinian police trying to clear streets of celebrants or Palestinians shooting in the air.The largest crowd, according to Israel Radio, is in the Balata refugee camp.
The American State Department policy of equating terrorist and defender equally must stop. This kind of moral equivalency allows the terrorist to believe he can do no wrong.
Both America and Israel must massively and disproportionately retaliate for terrorist attacks. The murderers of Americans and Israelis must be stopped. It is not impossible but it will be a long and difficult battle.
==========
Bernard J. Shapiro is Executive Director of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies and editor of THE MACCABEAN ONLINE, its monthly Internet magazine.
Posts
