Killing Their Own  
   By Jacob Laksin | 1/6/2009  
   From reprimands of “disproportionate  response” to condemnations of civilian casualties, Israel ’s military offensive  in Gaza has drawn de rigueur denunciations from the  international community. Less noticed is that while Israel has taken great pains  to avoid innocent deaths in Operation Cast Lead, at great peril to its fighting  men and women, Hamas vigilantes have spent recent days deliberately assaulting  and killing their fellow Palestinians, just as they have done for years.  
  
 According to the Jerusalem Post, since the beginning of the  Israeli offensive, more than 75 Gaza Palestinians have been shot in the legs or  have had their hands broken; more than 35 have been executed by Hamas operatives who  accuse them of being Israeli “collaborators.” Of course, Gaza is not teeming  with Israeli spies and most of Hamas’s victims are not only not traitors but  likely helped vote the terrorist group into power in the January 2006  legislative elections. Instead, Hamas’s campaign of homegrown terror is the  latest example of the terrorists turning on their Palestinian compatriots – a  brutal but seldom-discussed cycle of violence in which Palestinians emerge as  their own worst enemy.   
 Hamas’s fratricidal tendencies date back  to its 1987 founding. In her 1996 book God Has Ninety-Nine Names, Judith  Miller, a former New Yo rk Times  bureau chief in Cairo , reported that within a few years of its official  existence, Hamas had “proved more deadly to Palestinians than to Israelis.”  Between 1987 and 1993, the years of the first Palestinian intifada, Hamas killed  some 26 Israelis but also many of the 800 Palestinians murdered in those years  for being alleged Israeli “collaborators.” In 1992 alone, according to Middle  East analyst Mitchell Bard, some 200 Palestinians were killed by other  Palestinians – more than double the number of Palestinians killed fighting  with Israeli security forces.    
 Though murdered on the accusation of  aiding Israel , most were not collaborators at all. “Rather,” as Judith Miller  noted, “they were women who wore slacks and other ‘prostitutes,’ as Hamas called  unveiled women; they were alcoholics, drug users, teachers with whom Hamas  disagreed, Marxists, atheists, a Darwinist, Freudians, members of the Rotary and  Lions Clubs – which Hamas’s charter called Jewish spy organizations – and, in  particular, supporters of the PLO, Hamas’s main rival for power among  Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied territories.” 
 Even among the “guilty,” the definition  of collaboration often had more to do with Hamas’s hatred of Jews than any act  of betrayal. To have any contact with Jews was to risk being judged a  “collaborator.” So it was that, in October 1989, a Palestinian father of seven  was reportedly stabbed to death in the West Bank city of Jericho for the  unpardonable crime of selling “floral decorations” to Jews building a  traditional succah dwelling.   These targeted killings of Palestinians  marked not a departure from Hamas’s founding vision but its fulfillment. As an  offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas has always held the  Brotherhood’s position that its jihad will be successful only after its rivals –  real or imagined – are eliminated from within. Accordingly, Hamas’s original  security branch, Jehaz Aman, was founded by the late Sheikh Ahmed Yassin in 1983  with the express purpose of exterminating “heretics” and “collaborators.”  Similarly, the Qassam Brigades, Hamas’s self-styled “military wing,” terrorized  Palestinians before it became a danger to Israelis. In Hamas, his 2007 history of the terrorist  group, Matthew Levitt notes that the Qassam Brigades’ first functions were  “kidnapping and murdering suspected collaborators.” As the recent spate of  executions in Gaza suggests, Hamas continues that tradition.  
  
 Hamas, of course, has no monopoly on  killing fellow Palestinians. The death toll amassed by the rival Palestinian  Authority (PA) more than matches that of its Islamist counterparts, as  demonstrated by the second Palestinian intifada that broke out in 2000. Obscured  by the popular preoccupation with alleged Israeli abuses was that the greatest  threat to Palestinian life was once again internal. In a single week in March  2002, for example, PA gunmen killed seven Palestinians accused of being Israeli  agents. The corpse of one murdered “collaborator” was dragged through the  streets of Bethlehem , after which the killers tried to hang the remains from a  rooftop above Manger Square . The body of another unlucky victim was strung up  by its heels at a Ramallah traffic circle. Still others were abducted from a  West Bank road and executed in a deserted slaughterhouse. 
  
 Revealingly, the PA made no effort to  deny responsibility for the killings. Abu Mujahid, a spokesman for the Al Aqsa  Martyrs Brigades, the PA’s terrorist faction, insisted that on the contrary,  they were justified because these accused “collaborators” are “more dangerous than the Israelis.”   Still another source of internal strife  is the deadly rivalry between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. As recently  as 2007, the two sides were engaged in a bloody civil war that saw both commit  daily atrocities. In one particularly sadistic incident in June 2007, Hamas  militants kidnapped one Mohammed Sweirki, a 25-year-old officer in a PA-allied  security force, and then threw him off the roof of a 15-story apartment  building to his death. Fatah responded in kind with its own terror campaign,  raiding Hamas-linked mosques and abducting Hamas members in the West Bank . 
The cost in Palestinian lives was high. By June 2007, an estimated 616 Palestinians had been killed in the factional battles,  prompting PA president Mahmoud Abbas to lament that the threat that Palestinians posed to themselves  exceeded the "danger of occupation" by Israel . That reality, however, was  of little interest to most media, which chose instead to dwell on those subjects  – such as the impact of Israel ’s economic blockade on Gaza ’s “strawberry  farmers” – that accorded with their conception of the Jewish state as the true  aggressor in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.    
 Grim ironies abound in this history of  internecine violence. For all the Palestinians’ hatred of Israel, it is Israeli  forces who labor to spare civilians and who have in the past come to the rescue  of unjustly punished Palestinians – as when a 2002 incursion into Gaza by the  Israeli military freed accused Palestinian “collaborators” from prison.  Moreover, despite the widely held belief among Palestinians that Israel is to  blame for their grievances – the closest that Palestinians have come to a  unifying national ethos – it is Palestinians themselves who have done the  greatest violence to their cause. One need look no further than Gaza, where  Hamas’s popular support comes even as it has become the main threat to  Palestinian lives, both by inviting Israeli reprisals into crowded civilian  areas with its rocket attacks and by terrorizing Gaza residents who run afoul of  its despotic rule.
  
 The great tragedy of the Palestinians is  that they have been the authors of their own suffering. And so, while Israel may  yet succeed in eliminating the threat of Hamas-fired rockets, one question will  remain unanswered: Who will save the Palestinians from themselves?