Saturday, 21 February 2009

WATER WATER EVERYWHERE......YOU DRINK IT


A little warning I have just thought about which you may already be aware of, yet some might not.  A friend of mine was due to go into hospital for an operation and she was very, very nervous about going for an operation.  She had got to starve herself but could drink water. 

She must have had quite a number of visitors to wish her well and it wouldseem that all gave her the same message.  "You'll be fine.  Don't eat anything but drink plenty of water".  We didn't find out until a couple of days later, that the operation had been delayed, because she had apparently taken us all quite literally and she had drunk plenty of water, so much so that she had become violent and uncontrollable and "completely off her rocker" was the saying that comes to mind.  When the nurses rang up the relative that had taken her into hospital to ask was she always like this, the answer was the complete opposite because she was not only a nervous lady but was as meek and mild a person as ever you would be likely to meet. 

We did find out-and fortunately she did not remember any of the episode and still doesn't, it was that she had drunk far too much water which in turn had upset her system.  She must have taken us all literally and just sat and drank glass after glass of water!   


I am not clear  from your email.
From the test report data given ,I  assume the test was on the Hydroflourosilic Acid in the concentration and form before it was added to the water .  Do we know the dilution rate used  ,or, 
From you statement ,  was  this the concentration after adding it to the water. ?
The unit are not consistent  ` ppm` and some `ppb `   e.g.   Mercury  0.005 ppm ; Arsenic 4.826 ppm ; Aluminium 2.1 ppm; Chromium 3.763 ppm ; Cadmium 0.004 ppm
How does this compare with the water you and I drink from the Elan and Trimperly supply  ?  Some years ago I used to notice a difference which I suspected was detergents residues and / or  calcium  carbonate. [ hardness]
Where do I find the safe  and practical  limits for drinking water  ?
I see from the NPWA site that If  you object  to flouridised water and refuse to pay for it ,and charge it for bottled water, the Water Company  claim it will get paid by the department of Health anyway.
 

 

Subject: Whats in your Mouth?

I  wonder how many of you watched "What's in your mouth?  shown on ITV Tonight, Monday 16 February, ITV1," and watched while the dentists and Camera Crew all wore a type of Gas Mask to protect them from any spray or mist that might come from the "Fillings" that were being removed from the teeth of a rather 'brave' patient. 
 
If all that protection is needed to protect the onlooker from the mist, or spray in removing the rather solid fillings that contain a little mercury, even a small amount, why on earth are we all, even small childern drinking water with added fluoride that also contains mercury all be it such a tiny amount?  What about the 'mist' from the water we shower in?  The mist from washing up with?  Bath in and if time allows, soak ourselves in? What can even a small amount in our drinking water do, especially the many times a day we drink it in one form or another?  The mist from our bath water we are breathing in with the steam? 
 
Here below is an analysis of the flouride that is in our tap water. I have had this information as you will see, from the year 2000.  If you can obtain a more up to date version or get an analysis at all, I would be most pleased to read it. 
 
 
 
Chemical analysis of hydrofluorosilicic acid done by an Ireland lab:

MINISTER MISLEADS DAIL:
On 21/3/2000, the Minister of Health was asked, by J. Gormley (Green Party), if, "chromium is present in hydrofluoslicic acid, the fluoridating agent imported from Holland used to facilitate fluoridation of drinking water?" Minister Martin replied that the acid fluoride "does not contain chromium". FFW obtained a sample of this acid fluoride and had it chemically analysed at an independent laboratory in Dublin. This analysis confirmed our greatest fears, chromium is present and at similar levels as the arsenic also present. Minister Martin misled the Dail and the Irish people. This is misinformation at best or even fraudulent if Minister Martin is aware of the contaminants of this hazardous waste product of the fertiliser industry.

CAL Limited,
95 Merrion Square,
Dublin 2, Ireland.
Tel: 353 1 661 3033
Fax: 353 1 661 3399

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS CONFIDENTIAL REPORT No. W8158
Lab No. 23034
Sample Description: Hydrofluosilicic Acid
Date Reported: 14/08/2000

TEST RESULT
Calcium 51ppm
Magnesium 23.9ppm
Sodium 33.6ppm
Potassium 6.2ppm
Aluminium 2.1ppm
Boron 14ppb
Manganese 571ppb
Copper 90ppb
Zinc 523ppb
Phosphorus 26187ppm
Barium 168ppb
Iron 11.85ppm
Sulphur 134.9ppm
Arsenic 4826ppb
Cadmium 4ppb
Chromium 3763ppb
Mercury 5ppb
Nickel 1742ppb
Lead 15ppb
Selenium 2401ppb
Thallium <2ppb
Antimony 14ppb
Tin 4ppb
Cobalt 56ppb
Strontium 88ppb
Molybdenum 490ppb
Beryllium <2ppb
Vanadium 87ppb

According to the Irish Medicines Board, this hydrofluosilicic acid has never
been proven safe or effective and not surprisingly is unregistered,
unlicensed and not considered a medicine. So, what is it and why is it
untested? Why are we drinking unmeasured, uncontrolled levels of this toxic
cocktail without the freedom to make an informed choice?
 

                            ******************************************

extracts
Fluoride Free Water (FFW) formed on 16/9/99. We are a citizens’ group demanding an end to water fluoridation in Ireland. Alarmed at the increasing, worldwide, scientific studies showing health damage from fluoridation we publicly launched our group on 19/10/99. Walter Graham, spokesperson, Northern Ireland Councils Against Fluoridation, shared his knowledge and campaigning experience with over fifty citizens in Stillorgan, Co. Dublin. 25 out of 26 councils in Northern Ireland rejected fluoridation on health grounds after a concerted effort by the U.K. government to fluoridate the six counties.

 NO HEALTH STUDIES:
Through the Freedom of Information Act 1997, we discovered that successive health ministers were in breach of the Health (fluoridation of water supplies) Act 1960. Section 6 of this Act clearly states that the minister is required to study the health effects of water fluoridation on fluoridated communities. In thirty-five years of fluoridation, there is not one health study in Ireland.