By SIMON WALTERS The Government is refusing to release minutes of Cabinet meetings before the Iraq War because they would reveal there was no discussion on the issue. Details surrounding two crucial meetings on the eve of the conflict were laid bare for the first time yesterday when former Cabinet Minister Clare Short, who was present at both, gave a full account of what happened. She told The Mail on Sunday the main reason for the ‘scandalous’ decision not to publish the minutes was not to protect confidential discussions about the war, but to cover up the fact there was no such discussion. Former Cabinet Minister Clare Short says there was NO cabinet debate in the run up to war At the last Cabinet meeting, no debate on the legality of the war was allowed and Tony Blair, then Prime Minister, said brusquely: ‘That’s it.’ The official records would also put an end to claims by Gordon Brown’s supporters that, in private, he had grave doubts about the war, said Ms Short. In fact, he led the Cabinet campaign to accuse France of sabotaging British and American attempts to win United Nations support for the attack on Saddam Hussein. ‘It is extraordinary when you hear people like Jack Straw say that the Cabinet minutes cannot be published because you have to preserve Cabinet confidentiality and robust decision-making,’ said Ms Short, who resigned as International Development Secretary after the war. ‘The bitter irony is that what they are doing is concealing the fact there was no robust decision-making. The minutes will reveal there was no real Cabinet discussion about the Iraq War. That is the real scandal.’ Ms Short spoke out after the Government blocked an order by the Information Commissioner to reveal minutes of Cabinet meetings on March 13 and March 17, 2003, two days before the war started on March 19. She said: ‘Gordon had been completely marginalised in the run-up to the war. It wasn’t because he didn’t support it but because he and Tony were not getting on. Then, John Prescott had a dinner and knocked their heads together.’ The meeting on March 17 was called to discuss Attorney General Lord Goldsmith’s advice on the legality of the war. Ms Short said: ‘When we arrived, there was a piece of paper in front of each of us, a few paragraphs written by the Attorney General saying the war was legal, there were no problems etc. ‘Lord Goldsmith started reading it out but we said, “You don’t have to, we can read it.” Then Tony said something like, “That’s it.” And that was it. ‘I wanted to know if the Attorney General had any doubts about the legality of the war. ‘They all said, “Clare, be quiet, stop.” No one else wanted to talk about it. I was shouted down.’ Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below? Lies and more lies. Are they CAPABLE of telling the truth at all? This means that we went to war just on the say-so of Blair, and not one of th rest of the cabinet had the courage to object. Typical Blair and Gnu Labour. lies. lies and more lies! No democracy, a decision by him and that was that. When can we expect to see him in court?REVEALED: 'There was no Cabinet debate in run-up to war,' says Short as Government refuses to release minutes
Last updated at 10:18 AM on 01st March 2009
Share this article:
Monday, 2 March 2009
Posts
The truth is a stranger to nu labour.
Blairs crimes should be heard in court.
What a Disgrace..
- Rick, Newcastle UK, 01/3/2009 04:57