This is an extremely well written speech, beautiful reading, presented
in a logical and convincing manner.
Too bad there are not more like her!!
thank you..............p............
Baroness Deech on Gaza War
House of Lords debates
Friday, 6 February 2009
My Lord, I recently heard a speech by President Peres of Israel. He said
that if we look back 50 years, who would have imagined then that the
Soviet Empire would have ended, that the South African system of
apartheid would have been dismantled and Mandela would have become
president, that the Berlin Wall would have come down and that there
would be a black president of America? He said that we should look
forward 50 years from now in the same spirit. I want to start on that
optimistic note because I believe that if we wait that long-no doubt
beyond our lifetimes-there will be change for the better. I want to
emphasise that because inevitably much of my speech will be rather
gloomy.
No one can accuse this House of not focusing on the distressing
situation in Gaza. In the past 12 months, there have been 161 Questions
and Statements about Israel, Gaza and the Palestinians compared with,
for example, 33 on Sri Lanka and 24 on Tibet. I mention Sri Lanka in
particular because noble Lords will be aware that recently there was a
well attended protest in Parliament Square about the terrible attacks on
the Tamils, the hospitals under siege, the killing of 70,000 people and
the many more thousands who are trapped and displaced from their homes.
This has attracted little opprobrium and no calls for the obliteration
of Sri Lanka or talk of its brutalisation.
I raise that because I am interested in the particular focus on the
Middle East that is expressed in this country. Part of the reason is
that the war in Gaza has not been seen in perspective, but only as a
minute fragment of what is, in truth, a larger picture. There is a wider
war, of which Israel and Gaza are figureheads, and there is also a civil
war. The talk about what is proportionate-I prefer the word "necessary"-
has to be seen in the context of a response to an attack from Hamas
designed not just to launch rockets at Israel-5,000 rockets deliberately
aimed at Israeli civilians and schoolchildren at 7.45 in the morning-but
to end the state of Israel.
Hamas has vowed to have an Islamic state over Gaza, the West Bank and
Israel as part of a wider Islamic empire. Israel has a 20 per cent Arab
population, but not one Jew is to be allowed to live in this Islamic
state. We can well imagine the fate planned for the millions of Israelis
were this to come about. The response from Israel was, if anything, as
restrained as it possibly could be. We should recall the detailed
precautions taken by the Israeli army to avoid wherever possible harm to
civilians, bearing in mind the use of mosques, schools and hospitals, as
has been referred to earlier today.
The charges of "disproportionate" were not made in relation to other
wars that we have recently experienced; Kosovo, Georgia, Iraq or even
Afghanistan, where people have died in their thousands. In fact, there
has been some praise for the restraint that Israel has shown in trying
to avoid civilian casualties. There is also a civil war in Gaza, which
makes the prospects of peace unrealistic. The military dictatorship
there did nothing to protect its own subjects, but took the opportunity
of war to eliminate many of its Fatah political opponents. Other noble
Lords have referred to the very cruel details of this. Even the
Palestinian Authority's President Abbas said:
"Hamas has taken risks with the blood of Palestinians, with their fate
and dreams and aspirations for an independent Palestinian state".
The wider war is one of destruction of Israel, and those who criticise
Israel's attack on Gaza must realise that they are unwittingly giving
succour to that plan.
Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas all share that same aim of
destroying Israel entirely and, indeed, Hamas has thanked Iran for its
support in the Gaza war. As others have mentioned, the result has been
that Jews all over the world have suffered for this. The attacks on Jews
that have taken place here in the UK and elsewhere illustrate my theme
of a wider war. It is Jews and synagogues in London and Venezuela, in
universities, to their shame, and streets, that are attacked, with Gaza
as the excuse, not Israelis. It is not Jews who see all criticism of
Israel as anti-Semitism; it is some of the critics of Israel who vent
their displeasure on Jews in general. The hatred of Israel, and
sometimes Jews, is almost unique in international politics.
Then there is the propaganda war. I urge noble Lords not to believe all
that they read in the newspapers about damage and killings in Gaza. We
do not have the evidence. I cite just one case. The tragic killing of
the three daughters of the respected Gazan doctor Izzeldin Abuelaish now
seems to have been by Gazan rockets, not Israeli fire, according to the
post-mortem examination of the fragments of their bodies.
On the humanitarian front, of course, it is exacerbated, because Hamas
wanted civilian deaths to increase its worldwide exposure and sympathy.
Humanitarian aid is another area where the wrong and pessimistic view
has been taken. I noted with interest and approval that the BBC refused
to screen the advertisement for aid and that it was backed by its own
NUJ branch of journalists. It is not so good to hear talk of a Zionist
lobby and Jews mugging protests and stemming disquiet in the United
States, when you consider the very small numbers that there are. The
United Nations Relief and Works Agency has a huge budget. We do not yet
know what happened to the millions that Arafat salted away and took to
his death. We note the failure of other Arab countries to come to the
aid of their brothers. The oil revenue of the Gulf states in 2008 was
$562 billion; in Saudi Arabia it was $260 billion-one day's oil revenue
would work a miracle for the West Bank and Gaza, but this is not
forthcoming.
On the humanitarian front, Israel's Supreme Court in the past few days,
a court known for its robustness, has examined the application of the
Geneva conventions on humanitarian law and found them not to have been
breached. Other Arab countries have not only not helped but have
literally turned their backs on the Palestinians, as one can read
regarding Syria in the report in the Times today.
What of the future? Gaza could have had a future. Every Israeli soldier
and civilian was removed from there. Everything was ready for the Gazans
a few years ago to start a new period of economic development. There was
no blockade, and it remains true that Egypt could open its crossing if
it wanted to. It does not, of course, because it no more wants an
Iranian state on its borders than Israel does. Instead the rockets and
the tunnels came, and the sad destruction of the very greenhouses where
flowers and fruit were grown and could have continued to be grown.
What can the UK do? It can support Egypt, which is acting very well in
this crisis, albeit for its own reasons of survival. It can help block
Hamas from smuggling more arms by sea. It can press for the release of
Gilad Shalit, who has been a hostage in Gaza for two and a half years
with no access to the Red Cross or any other international agency. It
can persuade Hamas to change the charter and remove mention of
destruction. Above all, your Lordships should lend your voices to the
end of the demonisation of Israel and to calm down the surging
anti-Semitism. Your Lordships should recognise the need of Israel to
exist and its legitimacy. It is no more arriviste in the Middle East
than the other 22 Arab states to be found there. There can be no further
removal of six million Jews from the Middle East. We must do nothing to
feed the hatred that surrounds this issue and we must do everything to
look to the future.
Posts
