(Brogan here has today made his Telegraph debut having been political
editor of the Mail.)
Brogan urges caution in showing too much of his economic hand and
thus playing into Brown's hands. In the light of today's YouGov poll
and a major Tory lead, he might be right!
xxxxxxxxxxxxx cs
=================================
TELEGRAPH 23.4.09
Labour is desperate, and fighting to the end
Benedict Brogan, our new chief political commentator, warns the
Tories not to fall into the Prime Minister's elephant trap on taxation.
By Benedict Brogan
Gordon Brown likes dividing lines, and he has scrawled one, thick and
red, across British politics. The Budget tells us that Labour will
fight the next election on an old-fashioned platform of wealth-
destroying taxes and reckless spending. If any of this sounds
familiar, voters need only note that we are days away from the 30th
anniversary of Margaret Thatcher's 1979 victory, which was supposed
to have ended all that.
On the other side of that line stands David Cameron, contemplating a
moment of great danger for his leadership. Like the Iron Lady, he
knows who the enemy is. And like her, he knows he must find ways of
conveying a clear message: what the country was presented with
yesterday may be the next Labour manifesto, but it should not be the
first Tory budget.
Before a ballot has been cast, the Prime Minister has invited Mr
Cameron to say, here and now, whether he will reverse these tax rises
in office. In classic Brown style, the politics are refreshingly
crude and designed to trap the Tories: principle or politics? Are you
against tax increases or not?
So today, from the GMTV sofa to the Newsnight studio, and for the
best part of the next 12 months, the Tory leader and those who speak
for him must resist the temptation to answer a question to which any
Conservative should have an instinctive, vehement answer. To do so
would be to follow the script that the Prime Minister hopes will help
him cling to power.
It is a crucial moment for the Tories. Mr Brown has announced what
amounts to a generational shift in the balance between tax and
spending. On every measure, the scale of the task facing an incoming
Tory administration is as great as that faced by Mrs Thatcher 30
years ago.
It is precisely for that reason that Mr Cameron will step around the
elephant trap set by Mr Brown. As he pointed out in the Commons,
Labour's claim to economic competence is "dead, over, finished". A
party and a Prime Minister with no economic credibility are not
entitled to ask "what would you do?"
That said, the initial signs are as they should be. A grudging
willingness to accept a 45p rate is not going to extend to 50p, and
where Labour - incredibly -proposes to let public spending continue
rising in real terms, the Tories would not.
Study David Cameron's speeches, his interviews, his articles over the
near four years he has been leader and there is plenty of evidence
there that inside this husky-hugging metropolitan trendy beats the
heart of a true Conservative. He has been clear again and again that
if he has anything to do with it, taxes will go down under a Cameron-
led government.
The good news is that he has no intention of publishing his
manifesto, let alone his first Budget, any time soon. And nor should
he. Instead he must find ways of threading himself between Labour
catcalls and legitimate questions from his own side.
There will be those on the Tory side - I can hear them already - who
will try to present this Budget as some sort of Michael Foot suicide
note, a political miscalculation that will seal Labour's fate.
Surely, they will argue, this is the clincher? Surely now we shall be
swept to victory on a tide of public revulsion at this grasping,
venal, incompetent Government?
This would be to underestimate Mr Brown. In George Osborne's office
he is sometimes portrayed as the Terminator, a relentless automaton
of Teutonic mien who can only be counted as dead when the final
glimmer of light has been crushed out of those red, malicious eyes.
The Shadow Chancellor, who is also his party's election co-ordinator,
refuses to write off the Prime Minister, however much Labour MPs may
be talking down their chances. He argues, rightly, that Mr Brown is
not about to quit and has shown an annoying capacity for self-
preservation under pressure. Along with Mr Cameron, he is uneasy with
glib talk of triple-digit majorities and an effortless march back to
power.
His caution, frustrating to some, is borne of the harsh electoral
realities the Tories face, even with polls pushing their lead back up
towards 20 per cent. Labour losing power next year may now be a near
certainty, but a Tory win remains sufficiently uncertain to make Team
Cameron tread carefully in the face of an enemy who is cornered and
dangerous. Even with the dead unburied and the country on its knees,
Mrs Thatcher was returned with a majority of just 44. Sitting
governments are hard to budge.
Mr Osborne also fears what those in the Brown bunker desperately
hope: that, as the Chancellor predicted yesterday, the economy will
start to improve at the end of this year, in time for Labour to
claim, laughably as it may seem, that they got us through the
recession and out the other side.
That Tory optimism that so worries the leadership is in part
encouraged by the long faces of the MPs they see across the floor of
the House. It is one of the oddities at Westminster that you get the
longest odds on Labour's survival among Labour ministers and
backbenchers who see nothing but rocks ahead.
Their depression is understandable. Whatever fleeting bounce Mr Brown
enjoyed in the aftermath of a successful G20 has been wiped out by
the disasters of the past fortnight. At the end of Easter week he was
banking on a few days' rest and then the Budget to set him up for the
June elections campaign that opens next week.
Instead the exposure of Damian McBride's smear emails has had a
devastating effect inside Downing Street and across the Labour party.
Ministers speak of their shame at being members of a party that
stoops so low, on top of managing things so badly.
Mr Brown has also been told by his Chief Whip Nick Brown to expect
resignations when four years' worth of expenses are published in
July. By-elections are likely. Part of what motivated the Prime
Minister to rush out his half-baked plan for reform on Tuesday night
was the belief that another political crisis is imminent when the
public discovers the scale of the frauds perpetrated by some MPs.
This, in part, explains why yesterday's Budget was such a partisan
exercise. Mr Brown's strategy must be to shore up his Labour base
after being told by pollsters in recent weeks that turnout will play
a crucial role in deciding his fate. The party's grassroots shows
every sign of staying home rather than voting, forcing the Prime
Minister to cast about for ways of galvanising his core supporters.
Alistair Darling's talk of "fairness and opportunity" was just a
modern way of camouflaging simple pandering to sectional interests.
Whether on raising higher-rate income tax or scrapping pension
reliefs, Mr Brown will ignore the totemic shift of a move back to the
days when the Labour taxman took half or more of what you earned and
hammer home his message that only one or two per cent of earners are
concerned.
It is not a strategy that is finding universal approval among Labour
MPs. There are already rumblings from the Cabinet and elsewhere who
argue Labour will destroy itself if it insists on pandering to
minorities while ignoring the interests of the English middle
classes. "Gordon is not interested in middle England and that's
what's killing us," one Cabinet minister told me.
Mr Cameron and Mr Osborne point out that they called it right back in
the autumn. When Mr Brown was telling us Britain was best placed to
weather the downturn, they were pointing to the mountain of debt
stifling the economy; when Mr Brown gloated that the 1990 recession
was worse, it was Mr Osborne who told the Tory conference: "The
cupboard is bare, there is no more money."
No wonder Mr Cameron concluded yesterday, in a Budget response that
was striking in its authority and coldly controlled anger, that "the
fundamental truth is that all Labour governments run out of money".
In Armando Iannucci's searing satire about Labour spin doctors, In
The Loop, the foul-mouthed Alastair Campbell figure muses: "What's
brave about doing the right thing? Doing the wrong thing is sometimes
braver." To all those who say the right thing now is for Mr Cameron
to show his hand, he should consider that doing what to a Tory must
seem instinctively wrong is - for the moment - the braver course.
Friday, 24 April 2009
Posted by Britannia Radio at 00:40