Tuesday, 21 April 2009

Drugs led to deaths of patients

Three patients who died at a hospital in Hampshire in the late 1990s
were given inappropriate medication, an inquest jury has ruled.

The inquest panel looked at the deaths of 10 patients at Gosport War
Memorial Hospital between 1996 and 1999.

The panel of five women and three men also found that two patients were
given the correct medication but in doses which contributed to their
deaths.

The patients' families are now calling for a criminal investigation.

Some of the relatives had long believed morphine was being over-
prescribed.

Police carried out investigations into 92 patients' treatment at the
hospital, but no prosecutions were brought.

Three investigations

The jury at Portsmouth Coroner's Court decided that in the cases of
Robert Wilson, 74, Geoffrey Packman, 66, and Elsie Devine, 88, the use
of painkillers was inappropriate for their condition.

Arthur Cunningham, 79, and Elsie Lavender, 83, were prescribed
medication appropriate for their condition but in doses which
contributed to their deaths, jurors found.

In the cases of Leslie Pittock, Helena Service, Ruby Lake, Enid Spurgin
and Sheila Gregory, the jury decided that the prescription of
painkillers had not contributed to their deaths.
“ We did not expect this inquest to be transparent, honest or fair and
our expectations have been met in full ”
Statement by families

The inquest recorded a narrative verdict.

The jury heard evidence from members of the patients' families, medical
experts and staff at the hospital, including Dr Jane Barton.

She was investigated by police in connection with deaths at the hospital
but she was not charged with any offence.

She said in a statement: "I can say that I have always acted with care,
concern and compassion towards my patients.

"I am pleased the jury recognised that in all of these cases, drugs were
only given for therapeutic purposes."

In a statement after the verdicts, the families said: "This has been a
10-year emotional journey for the families, not just those families
directly involved in the inquest but also the relatives of the 92
victims investigated by the police who are also still waiting for
answers.

"We did not expect this inquest to be transparent, honest or fair and
our expectations have been met in full."

"Extreme drug overdoses were given without justification or logic that
rendered our families comatose in a matter of hours and dead soon after,
giving relatives no warning or opportunity to speak with them.

"The families' journeys are not over. Once we have all the evidence as
denied by this coroner, we will reflect on the last few weeks and decide
our next steps."

Inquiry call

The families also said that a fresh criminal investigation by Hampshire
police was needed.

But in response to their call the force has said it will not
reinvestigate any of the deaths.

Meanwhile, the patient safety charity Action against Medical Accidents
(AvMA) called for a public inquiry.

AvMA chief executive Peter Walsh said: "It is now quite clear the
refusal to hold a public inquiry was wrong.

"There were other deaths at Gosport which should have been looked into
as well as the role played by various agencies, which may have prevented
the poor practice at Gosport or it being investigated promptly and
appropriately."

In response, the force said: "Hampshire Constabulary has conducted three
separate investigations during which the Crown Prosecution Service has
been fully consulted.

"The evidence gathered during these investigations was shared with the
coroner and heard by the jury during the course of the inquests.

"It is our genuine hope that the extensive nature of the investigations
conducted, the findings of the Crown Prosecution Service and now that of
HM Coroner, provide those involved with some resolution, if not comfort,
for the loss of loved ones."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/england/hampshire/8002641.stm

Published: 2009/04/20 19:36:49 GMT