The "Sugar Daddies" Behind Feminism
April 4, 2009
(Left, John D. Rockefeller and his son, David)
by Richard Evans
The "Patriarchy" is the Plutocracy and it's Funding Feminism!
When big things happen, always follow the money. Feminist NGO's funding comes from big foundations. Google "Women's Studies" and Rockefeller Foundation and you'll get 132,000 links. Google "Women's Studies" and Ford Foundation and you'll get 217,000 links. Carnegie Foundation yields 197,000 links. They frequently acknowledge foundation funding and expose a massive social engineering program in our NGO's, schools and universities.
Yet, horror to tell, these foundations are dominated by men, not women.
https://feminist.org/research/
- A 1990 report by Women and Foundations/Corporate Philanthropy found that 23% of foundations surveyed had no women or people of color as trustees. Furthermore, women of color made up only 5% of all foundation trustees.
- 71% of foundation members are male. A similar bias exists among foundation directors. At 14%, women are better represented among chief executive officers of foundations, but they tend to head the smaller foundations. The largest independent foundations are headed by men.
Whether they know it or not, feminists all have these unseen sugar daddies. The rank and file don't know that because they're too busy picking on men who don't pull any strings in this culture any more than they do.
I'll show you how to check it out yourself and give you some research tools. First, you'll need the Grants Foundation Index. Using this you can look up foundations and see where their money goes.
http://library.dialog.com/
Start with an organization's website and where possible, find who funds them, and the list of their board. Save to a notepad or word.doc. When you've collected a lot of donors names, most you won't recognize, some you will, but you'll see they are old very wealthy plutocrats whose names crop up over and over again. They're not all American names either listed on these US foundations. You'll find many names listed in Who's Who in America consisting of an predominance of Anglo-Americans, Jews, and a percentage of Spanish, German, Italian, Japanese, and some Russian. But nationalities don't matter. What binds them more powerfully is that they're all Plutocrats.
When you have the names of the foundations that fund them upfront, check those foundations websites to find who their funders and/or donors are. Sometimes this can take some digging.
As you go, check each foundation with the Grants Foundation Index. This will tell you what kind of other organizations they fund.
During the 20th century funding up through the 1970's feminist/population control organizations used to be relatively easy to trace to two 'prime mover' sources. These could be found either funding directly or through one or two 'conduit' foundations.
The big two were (are)
Rockefeller Foundation (primarily funding US based feminism/population controller NGO's in the Western hemisphere.
Carnegie Foundation (US based international NGO's)
Today it takes more time to trace the money trail back to where the buck stops. The up front organizations who commonly can be found funding NGO's involved in the catch-all 'women's rights' include :
International Planned Parenthood Federation
(IPPF), the International Women's Health Coalition, the Population Council,
International Projects Assistance Services (Ipas), the Center for Reproductive Rights
Family Care International
Carnegie Corporation
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
David and Lucile Packard Foundation
The MacArthur Foundation
You can check all these out and follow the money backwards. The largest and most powerful feminist and population control NGO's are US based because feminism was developed by the Foundation here beginning in the early 20th century. Now these organizations have an international reach.
Prior to US invasion/occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, the primary target of US population control and 'women's rights' foundations was Latin America, and Mexico. Until the Robles Reform was approved, abortion was illegal in every Mexican state. All that changed, however, in January 2002--thanks, in large part, to funding provided by U.S. pro-abortion foundations.
When the 911 episode gave the US government the excuse it needed to seize Afghanistan and Iraq. destabilizing the region from Iraq to Pakistan, the way was open for the Foundations to deploy the NGO's of 'culture change'.
Islamic culture has a history of being highly resistant both to Western culture and more importantly, they don't want our credit based central banking system taking over with our fraction reserve currency system and IMF/World Bank strangling their banking systems and economies. Men and women a century ago didn't want any of that in the Western hemisphere either. But opinion and consent were changed through foundation funding of the education system, entertainment and media industry, and ultimately, manufactured adversarial division of gender consensus, and a whole lot of social engineering.
Back to tracing feminist funding back to the particular kind of 'Patriarchy' behind the exploitation of women, men, and children, some keywords used for Foundation funding reports rather than 'feminist' or 'pro-choice' are:
Health care
Health organizations
Housing/Shelter
Human services
International affairs
International giving
Medical research
Mental health/Crisis services
Mutual aid societies
Philanthropy/Voluntarism
Population groups
Public affairs
Religion
Mental health/Crisis services
Science and Social sciences
Youth development
Additional NGO tool
http://www.ngo-monitor.org/articles.php?cat_id=22
The money trail leads back to expose once and for all the REAL Patriarchy making life hell for women, men, children, the elderly, and the starving:
The Patriarchy of the International Central Banking Cartel. Would it feel any better if they were evil old crones instead of old evil men?
The real "Patriarchy" is the PLUTOCRACY. Not fathers, husbands, brothers and co-workers.
Posts
