The Ultimate Delusion
By: Stephen Ames
Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as
follows: S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security (United States of
America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st
September 1997.
See APFN Web Pages: http://www.apfn.
http://www.apfn.
At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now,
therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the
Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling
Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council,
to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:
"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of
America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice
stating in court that he takes his orders from England?
This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and
makes some changes in United States Law. Remember, King George was the
"Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and
of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1783) 8 U.S.
Statutes at Large 80.. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is
in charge of the USA ..'
What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King
George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their
knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a
debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the
UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the
Revolutionary war. See Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. and 28 U.S.C.
3002 (15)
The United States is not a land mass, it is a corporation.
Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of
England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8
Statutes at Large 80.
On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21
loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February
28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money
which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. King George
funded both sides of the Revolutionary War.
Now the Articles of Confederation which were declared in force March 1,
1781 States in Article 12:
"All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by,
or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United
States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and
considered a charge against the United States, for payment and
satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are
hereby solemnly pledged."
The Articles of Confederation acknowledge the debt owed to King George.
Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing
more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, the
conquest was not yet complete. Now the loans were coming due and so a
meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic
instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only
five States come to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting
to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express
purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787
Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on
May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation. Something had to
be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so
called founding fathers were going to reorganize the United States
because it was Bankrupt.
On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution.
The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law,
one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of
another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed.
The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people
of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution
because it was never put to them for a vote.
See APFN web page http://www.apfn.
On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making
provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be
found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all
intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If
you don't believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here
in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a
portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize
their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because
the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original
State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So
the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for
a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain.
The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso
facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a
fictional enti ty and it is synonymous with subject.
What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a
Person.
"Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272 "Word "person"
does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this
planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a
fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your
mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our
children to a fiction. For an in-depth look into the nature of these
corporations and to see how you also have been declared a fictional
entity. See: AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE. JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL
INSTITUTIONS. VOL.XIII By James De Witt Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law
School), LL.D. (Ruskin University) from La Salle University. This book
explains in detail the nature and purpose of these corporations, you
will be stunned at what you read.
Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the
Constitution.
Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it states;
"All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption
of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under
this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight
clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on
the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States
(Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and
then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also
be liable for it. The next underhanded move was the creation of The
United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were
25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The
Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the
United States. Now the creditors of the United States which included the
King wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United
States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing
alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia
to collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the Whisk ey
rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United
States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to
the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United
States belongs to the founding fathers, their posterity and Great
Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been.
How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the
Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you
are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!
If you don't believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and
Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states "
But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in
court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution,
it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15)
which states that it is the militia's job to execute the laws of the
Union. Now read Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the power to
provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for
governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the
United States.... the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is
their duty to collect our substance. As you can plainly see all the
Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King's
commerce and make us slaves. If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large
116-132 you will find "The Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation".
This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794 which was twelve years
after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King's Troops
were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was,
he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796 .
The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the King
wanted them here.
Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems, but they too are
for the most part also slaves. Jewish Law does however govern the entire
world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME
COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit: "Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding
on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give
effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic
sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in
Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactment's and decrees, instituted
the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted
all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the
tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession
going back to Moses, our teacher."
We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the
subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure").
Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews
Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol
71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the
Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also
explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the
Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the
Uniform Commercial Code which is private international law. The written
credit agreement -- the Jewish shetar is a lien on all of the property
in the world. The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by
Great Britain and that the Jews are in charge of the Baking system.
We are living under the Babylonian Talmud. It was brought into England
in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the various
religions ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people
are taught to believe in things that do not exist. Private International
Law, which is commercial law, only deals with fictions, known as
persons. A person is a fictional entity at law, not a living being. See
UCC 1-201.
Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people,
you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below.
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in
court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution
it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay &
Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520 You
have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the
United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not
you. Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that
automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have
it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and
tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not
holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why?
Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government
official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not
a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slav e. When you
try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL
TRESPASS. Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private
contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are
a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user
of your Masters property!
Here are just a couple of examples:
"The primary control and custody of infants is with the government"
Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
"Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the
husband, the wife and the state." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual
so-called 'ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law
amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and
subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd
Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra)
You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off
than a slave because you are also a debtor.
"The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute
inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were
instituted, and never can exist under government." Wynehamer v. The
People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481
Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The
IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government.
See APFN web page http://www.apfn.
All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By using
IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking
series which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most
taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is
reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File
in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers
are considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable
for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the
U.K. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288,
FIRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in
the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-
of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active
Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where
form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. w ith
holding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form
#8288, #8288a.
These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309,
Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code
for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF
390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a
1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K.? Everybody is always looking
to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so called Income
Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt
collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the
United States Article Six, Section One and various agreements. Is a cow
paying an income tax when the machine gets connected to it's udders ?
The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns property or has
been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever
produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is
measured in current credit money, which is debt. You are allowed to
retain a small po rtion of your labor so that you can have food,
clothing shelter and most of all breed more slaves.
You see, we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the
United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and
Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held
in allodium by the Pope. Now the picture will become much clearer after
reading the next few paragraphs. We will now show the Popes involvement
in the scheme of things. "Convinced that the principles of religion
contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive
obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties
declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states,
those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating
their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the
authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering
their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and
solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the
nations. " Article (3) Treaty of Varona (1822)
If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being
observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c.
vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory
without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop.
28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal Law) or the exceptional
ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at
any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol.
I 53-54. So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world?
The Pope (Vicar of Christ) claims to be the ultimate owner of everything
in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1492.
Don't let this information alarm you because without it you cannot be
free, You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in
the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the
United States,
Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but
fictional entities which have been placed into your mind, you will
understand that our slavery is because we believe in fictions.
THE END
Posts
