Crisis Management.

I’ve quoted in the past Lincoln Bloomfield’s Study Memorandum No. 7 for Rhodes scholar Secretary of State Dean Rusk in 1962: 

“If the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government.” 

So just substitute the words “radical Muslim” for “communist” and “Israel” for “the West,” and you will understand the PE’s mechanism at work today.

======================

Who said the following? 

“This state of mind, which subordinates the interests of the ego to the conservation of the community, is really the first premise for every truly human culture…. 

The basic attitude from which such activity arises, we call – 

to distinguish it from egoism and selfishness-idealism. 

By this we understand only the individual’s capacity to make sacrifices for the community, for his fellow men.” 

It was Hitler who wrote the quoted words inMein Kampf (July 18, 1925). 

Further relevant to what is occurring today, Leonard Peikoff in Ominous Parallels (1982) wrote:

“Contrary to the Marxists, the Nazis did not advocate public ownership of the means of production. 

They did demand that the government oversee and run the nation’s economy.

The issue of legal ownership, they explained, is secondary; what counts is the issue of control.

 Private citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property – so long as the state reserves to itself the unqualified right to regulate the use of their property…. 

But the Nazis defended their policies, and the country did not rebel; it accepted the Nazi argument. Selfish individuals may be unhappy, the Nazis said, but what we have established in Germany is the ideal system, socialism. 

In its Nazi usage this term is not restricted to a theory of economics; it is to be understood in a fundamental sense. 

‘Socialism’ for the Nazis denotes the principle of collectivism as such and its corollary, statism – in every field of human action, including but not limited to economics. 

‘To be a socialist,’ says Goebbels, ‘is to submit the I to the thou; socialism is sacrificing the individual to the whole.’”

The British PE Milner Group didn’t want a strong Israel. Thus, during the Carter administration, according to Morton Klein, Secretary of State Cyrus Vance (member of Yale University’s secret society Scroll & Key) “once revealed that if Carter had won a second term, he intended to sell Israel down the river.”

Today, the PE uses the terrorist acts of radical Muslims against Israel as a means of pressuring Israelis to make compromises that will lead to an eventual acceptance of a World Socialist Government. 

I’ve quoted in the past Lincoln Bloomfield’s Study Memorandum No. 7 for Rhodes scholar Secretary of State Dean Rusk in 1962: 

“If the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government.” 

So just substitute the words “radical Muslim” for “communist” and “Israel” for “the West,” and you will understand the PE’s mechanism at work today.