Thursday, 28 May 2009

If this goes through this will be the end of London as a great  
financial centre which is exactly what the EU wants.  We are stuck  
with Gordon Brown to defend our position in June which gives little  
room for confidence.

Meanwhile the ordinary news columns of the press are so deep in the  
mire and muck that are raking up about MPs’ trivia that they are  
completely ignoring this threat to our very existence.  Damian  
McBride’s friends must be laughing at their revenge.

xxxxxxxxxxxxx cs
==============================

TELEGRAPH                    28.5.09
Europe tightens regulatory noose on City
The European Commission has seized on the financial crisis to bring  
the City under closer EU control and clip the wings of Britain's  
Financial Services Authority, unveiling far-reaching plans for a new  
EU regulatory machinery with binding powers.

    By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso Photo: REUTERS
"It's now or never," said Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso.  
"If we cannot reform the financial sector when we have a real crisis,  
when will we?"  [That remark gives the game away.  These proposals  
are nothing to do with economics or finance. They are are solely  
about power -cs]

Three new bodies are to be created with a permanent staff and powers  
to impose decisions on member states: a European Banking Authority in  
London; a European Insurance Authority in Frankfurt; and a European  
Securities Authority in Paris.

Each will be composed of chief regulators from the 27 member states.  
While they look much like the EU's existing "talking shop"  
committees, they are in reality executive agencies able to set  
binding standards and impose their overall philosophies.

The Commission said the new authorities would have powers to "settle  
the matter" by imposing a decision – in effect, stripping Britain and  
other countries of the national veto.

While the proposals fall short of a pan-European regulator, they may  
have a similar effect. The European Court of Justice is to have the  
final say over any appeal.

"This is exactly what I feared would happen," said Ruth Lea, director  
of UK think-tank Global Vision. "The EU is taking advantage of the  
crisis to extend its control over the British financial system. It is  
very threatening because it is almost impossible to repeal anything  
in the EU, however damaging it proves to be."

The Barroso plan will go to EU heads of state in June. Legislation  
will be drawn up this autumn and submitted to European MPs, already  
itching to ratchet up the text.

Klause-Heiner Lehne, a German MEP for the Christian Democrats, left  
no doubt that this is viewed as a chance to punish the City. "It's  
well-known that Gordon Brown has only the interests of London as a  
banking centre in mind and not the stability of financial markets. It  
must be clear to all of us that the role of the financial markets is  
allocating capital, not as a playground for gamblers making huge  
bets," he said.

Mr Barroso said the new machinery should be up and running in 2010,  
adding: "We are not taking away national supervisors' day-to-day role."

The plan includes an "early warning" body modelled on the US Federal  
Reserve's new system. Charlie McCreevy, the EU's single market  
commissioner, said national regulators were not aware of problems  
developing in other countries during last year's banking crisis until  
they read about it in the newspapers, an untenable situation given  
that 40 banks controlling the bulk of EU assets operate as cross- 
border institutions, affecting everybody.

Britain has few friends in this fight other than Luxembourg, which  
has its own financial centre. It hard for the UK to argue that its  
"light-touch" regime has been a great success after last year's  
banking debacles – although Europe's banks have yet to come clean on  
their own toxic debts.

Antonio Borges, chair of the Hedge Funds Standards Board, said the  
blizzard of EU proposals had been hijacked by political forces and  
were "out of control".

"There is little intellectual foundation to what they are doing," he  
said. "You would have thought that since 80pc of Europe's hedge funds  
are in Britain, and are already regulated, that the FSA would have a  
big say [on hedge fund proposals], but the FSA was marginalised. The  
reality is that a great deal of regulatory power is going to Brussels."
==============================
EU OBSERVER                    28.5.09
Capitals fear commission finance proposals threaten national regulators
    ANDREW WILLIS

  BRUSSELS – Several EU member states have reacted with concern to  
long-awaited proposals on financial regulation that were published by  
the European Commission on Wednesday (27 May), fearing the role of  
national regulators could be undermined.

Under the new proposals, which draw extensively on a report produced  
by a group of financial experts and chaired by former Bank of France  
governor, Jacques de Larosiere, three new pan-European authorities  
would be set up in the areas of banking, insurance and securities to  
oversee national regulators.

Several countries, including the UK and a number of new member  
states, are concerned over a paragraph in the commission  
communication that says the financial authorities would be given  
legal powers to settle disputes between national regulators if the  
situation arose.

"The European supervisory authorities should, through a decision,  
settle the matter," says the document.

Some governments are now concerned that while they would ultimately  
be called upon to bail out banks under their jurisdiction that run  
into financial difficulty, important decisions on how those banks are  
run could come from outside.

"Regulating specific firms needs to be aligned with national  
authorities who are ultimately on the line when it comes to providing  
emergency support for troubled institutions," sources familiar with  
the UK position told EUobserver.
"If that function is going to continue to be a national one, then the  
UK's view is that the regulation of firms should remain national as  
well," they said, adding that the UK might challenge the legality of  
the authorities' new powers.

Last resort
The commission was quick to point however that overruling a national  
authority would be a situation of last resort.

Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said the three authorities  
did not constitute an attack on national powers and that national  
regulators would still be the first line of defense in preventing a  
repeat of the financial crisis that broke out last year.

"Our proposal is based on the principle of subsidiarity," he said.
Internal market commissioner Charlie McCreevy said they would "not  
impact on the fiscal role of member states", but added that he was  
surprised at member state unwillingness to act more as a group.

"You would think that the present crisis would have spurred ministers  
and supervisors to find better ways of working together but I'm  
afraid the crisis has had the opposite effect," he said.

As an example of the lack of communication between member states, he  
said several EU finance ministers had told him they only learned  
about problems in foreign-owned banks with branches in their country  
through the newspapers.

The commission proposals also envisage that the three authorities  
would be overseen by a steering group to prevent an overlap in their  
work, a provision not contained in the Larosiere report.

Risk council
While less contentious, the second main proposal contained in the  
commission's communication, the setting up of a European systemic  
risk council, is also likely to meet with some resistance.

The new body that would monitor risk levels in the European economy  
as a whole and issue risk warnings when necessary is to be chaired by  
the president of the European central bank, something the UK feels  
nervous about as a non-eurozone country.

One possible solution is the election of a vice-chair from a non-euro  
state to allay fears they would not be represented.

The risk council's board would also contain the 27 national central  
bankers, a member of the European commission and the three  
chairpersons from proposed financial authorities.

Economy commissioner Joaquin Almunia said the risk council would help  
to eradicate the "boom and bust cycles that are the cause of the  
crisis", but added the proposed body would only be effective if  
member states provided it with the necessary information to carry out  
accurate analysis.

Warnings to member states would be followed up through an "act or  
explain" mechanism, designed to increase peer pressure on countries  
unwilling to make changes.

As a whole, the new plans constitute a major part of the commission's  
long-term response to the financial crisis and is likely to be  
something Barroso will hold up as an achievement under this current  
term as he looks for a second at the June European council.

However, securing agreement on the new proposals at the June meeting  
of EU leaders could yet prove problematic.