http://homoveritas.net/blog/?p=5001 When it comes to tricking the people, British (two party) democracy is one clever system; which is precisely what we would expect when we consider how long it has been around for. Do you know what is so clever about it? It pretends to pit one side against the other when really it exists solely to ensure the perpetuation of both for as long as theagenda needs them. The only way ‘democracy’ can survive in its British format is to have two apparently opposing sides; the remainder of the parties just ‘making up the numbers’. Here is a little known fact: It matters not which side is actually in power; the party in ‘opposition’ dictates government decision-making, and vice versa. But the decisions made always serve the agenda, the ultimate goal of which is world government (which has nothing to do with Britain per se). So we can conclude that the Conservatives and Labour are on the same side. If we look at the current situation, we see Labour is nearing the end of its governmental reign. This being so, whatever the Tories say happens to have more credence in the political arena. As we are about to find out, the Tories can even criticise Labour policy (based on a lie) and make it look as if it only goes halfway towards dealing with the ‘problem’ (a lie in the first place). When it comes to tricking the people, British democracy is one clever system. From the BBC website (my comments in red): UK ‘at risk of sea-borne attack’ [full story here] Britain is vulnerable to terrorist attack from the sea because no single body is responsible for protecting the UK’s coast, MPs have warned. The only terrorist attacks are those planned by the people who already know what measures they will then impose on the people under the guise of dealing with the ‘terrorists’. Just nine Royal Navy ships along with a “motley collection” of police and coastguard boats guard a shoreline more than 7,000 miles long. And? What evidence is there of an impending terrorist attack? There is none! ‘Terrorism’ has become a term as generic as it is meaningless. Of course, there is nothing meaningless about Terrorism as far as pushing the agenda on is concerned. And the agenda is always very concerned! Very serious! (You are not supposed to laugh at the agenda - that makes it very angry). The Commons defence committee suggests developing a “deterrent capability” to ward off sea-borne attacks. What evidence is there of the remotest possibility of a sea-borne attack? The Ministry of Defence has insisted clear procedures are in place. Ah! Here’s the necessary counterweight to the argument put forward by the Commons defence committee. The argument needs ‘opposition’ to give it the right to exist, just as the Tories and Labour need each other to prevent their otherwise inevitable collapse. Concerns over the UK’s preparations for dealing with a maritime terrorist threat were raised by the committee. A ‘maritime terrorist threat’. Readers, are you worried? Are you laughing? Reactive forces Its statement said: “We are concerned at the level of action being taken to address threats to aspects of national infrastructure such as ports. What are you basing your concerns on? “What assets are available for maritime security tend to be reactive forces.” What are you basing your concerns on? The statement continued: “There is a strong case for developing a deterrent capability in relation to threats to civilian maritime targets. There is no ’strong case’, so what are you basing your concerns on? “We are not satisfied that an intelligence-led approach is sufficient.” What are you basing your concerns on? At present the Royal Navy has six warships, two patrol vessels and a support tanker protecting UK waters. They are backed up by 120 police boats, five coastguard patrol boats and five UK Border Agency vessels. But the Conservatives have called for a full review of the defensive capability. The Conservatives! Here, this party - soon to take the reigns of government - is making it clear the British people are only going to get more-of-the-same government they already despise. More of the same means a continuation and extension of the agenda’s illusory grip of control. It’s a downward spiral, based on a FEAR FACTOR to stop people from expressing themselves. Fear makes people contract inwards, becoming ever more dependent, rather than expanding with creative thought. Indeed, fear can shut down the independent thought process altogether. That the Tories are able to get away with suggesting a full review of Britain’s ‘defensive capability’ (they are saying more control is necessary) shows how the system of politics, although it is gradually being manipulated into breaking itself apart, remains almost as effective as ever with regards to achieving its aims. They say the November 2008 Mumbai attacks - during which gunmen arriving by boat killed more than 170 people - could be replicated in the UK. Ah, now we know what they are basing their concerns on! Those attacks were an inside job and they will never be replicated in the UK. The point is not to replicate them but to use them as the Problem which creates the Reaction (from the public) which leads to the Solution put forward by politicians. It takes time to plan these attacks, and each time the risks of exposure are greater, so the elite want to keep terrorist incidents to a minimum - as long as they achieve their purpose: to push on the agenda. Whoever or whatever manipulates our reality totally lacks any sort of empathy. Lack of clarity Shadow defence secretary Liam Fox said: “It is clear from this report the government has not given sufficient attention to the role of the armed forces in its domestic security policy. Liam Fox will soon be stepping into the limelight alongside his boss David Cameron. Public relations man Cameron will be crowned Prime Minister and Fox will become Defence (War on the People) Secretary. “The lack of clarity about the role of the MoD in terms of maritime security needs to be addressed. Politicians are oh-so-good at addressing. They are absolutely useless at encouraging happiness in their citizens. “This is why we need a Strategic Defence Review to identify the roles the armed forces will be needed for.” So to the nitty gritty. The Strategic Defence Review he is talking about has a hidden purpose behind it. It is the excuse which will be used to tighten the grip of the military over its own people. The committee also called for the role of the Army during natural emergencies such as floods to be clarified and the Territorial Army to be used more regularly. This is nothing new. We already have the templates of Communism and Nazism to show us the effects of military rule. But an MoD spokesman said: “There are clear procedures in place for the armed forces to provide military assistance to other government departments both in times of national crises. Although it stops short of saying it is helping to maneuver absolute military rule into existence, this is the bit where the current regime tells us what a fine job it is already doing on that front. “How dare the opposition suggest we are not doing well enough!” On and on goes the charade. Orwellian Translation Unit says: “in times of national crises” = national crises are coming. “Work is under way to provide other government departments with guidelines on how to request military assistance in areas such as counter terrorism. Of course it is! “We regularly take part in counter terrorism exercises.” Of course you do! JP I aim to expose the truth. Please wake up!How politics drives on the agenda
My latest blog entry is here
My positive message about the future is here
Monday, 25 May 2009
Posts
