TELEGRAPH 8.5.09
This, you might think, was a bit rich coming from a leader whose
unmuzzled pitbull mistook the dissemination of defamatory tales about
Tory rivals for a public-relations strategy. Nevertheless, the
descent of Wednesday's PMQs into an exposition of Mr Brown's personal
inadequacies (an unmissable target) served only to deflect attention
from the United Kingdom's dire straits.
Tempting though it must be for adversaries to remind an unrepentant
Prime Minister of his behavioural oddities, the time for such tribal
indulgences has long gone. Who cares if he chucks his phone at the wall?
At this stage of the game, with the nation's finances shredded by
Downing Street's incompetence, every second counts. It should be Mr
Brown who is seeking amusing diversions from reality, not the
Opposition.
In a feeble attempt to appear interesting, Hazel Blears, the
Secretary of State for Communities, wrote in last weekend's Observer:
"No government after 12 years in office can compete on slick
presentation and clever sound bites."
Many Labour MPs will be praying that she is wrong, because if the
general election is fought on matters of substance, they are doomed.
Massaging the message may be all that she and her colleagues have left.
In Parliament, Mr Brown dared the Tories to tackle him on big issues
that really count. They should do so – with gusto. After more than a
decade of his stewardship, the British economy is in such a shocking
condition that it is very hard for ordinary voters to comprehend the
scale of the problems that we, our children and grandchildren will
face. Forget wisecracks about the Prime Minister's psychological
flaws, let's concentrate on his track record.
As millions of consumers are discovering, there are phases in the
build-up of unaffordable debt when it is possible to imagine that
living way beyond one's means is a legitimate and sustainable option.
For a while, doomsters' warnings of disaster are readily ignored. The
time bomb is ticking, but without an explosion the dangers can be
passed off as undue pessimism.
This is the position of some Labour diehards who continue to press
for yet more unfunded government spending, while manufacturing fears
of "Tory cuts" (they were at it again during PMQs). One can almost
smell their fear.
Faced with the horror of expulsion from the Commons – and the
prospect of finding a proper job, without a cornucopia of expenses –
they demand bribes for the electorate, even though mounting bills
will destroy the budgetary independence of future generations. The
position of these MPs is nakedly selfish: we'll enjoy the goodies
now; someone else can pay later.
As the voice of integrity on Labour's backbenches, Frank Field
rightly says: "We're sleepwalking into a mega-crisis. It is
irresponsible to leave the public finances in this state until after
the next election."
In an Early Day Motion, he and Vince Cable set out the risks that
some other MPs prefer not to acknowledge: "Neither the Government nor
the official Opposition has published the changes that will be
required to tax revenues and public expenditure levels over the short
to medium term, preferring to leave such discussions until after the
election… it is increasingly likely in these circumstances that the
Government will find it ever more difficult to raise the necessary
amount of debt, with all the dangers such a failure entails for the
value of the UK's currency [and] its future prosperity." [In fact I
published the three major options under discussion now only this week
- 6/5/09 (“The grim options open to us”) -cs]
If it were just the Conservatives and their fellow travellers in the
media who rejected Alistair Darling's vision for a quick recovery,
ministers might rest more easily. But international bodies and
independent forecasters are queueing up to denounce the Chancellor's
forecasts as politically motivated wishful thinking. Apart from his
paid advisers and that bloke with a bottle of meths who sleeps in
Parliament Square, it's hard to find anyone who thinks that Mr
Darling's predictions for growth and debt levels are credible.
The International Monetary Fund and the European Commission both
expect Britain's output to shrink this year by more than the 3.5 per
cent that was outlined in the April Budget. The National Institute of
Economic and Social Research (NIESR) forecasts that the contraction
will be 4.3 per cent, with unemployment continuing to increase until
2011, peaking at more than 3 million. When Miss Blears referred to
the Government's "lamentable failure to get across our message", was
it this, I wonder, that she had in mind?
The NIESR report is only for those with formidable constitutions.
Lesser folk will require illegal quantities of medication in order to
read the whole thing.
Growth (or lack of it) is, of course, only half the story. When Mr
Darling's economy fails to recover in line with his projections, the
borrowing needed to fill the hole will whizz off the meter. But who
will lend us the money?
The Chancellor says that his borrowing will top £700 billion over the
next five years. If correct, that would stretch the country's credit
rating to breaking point. But, without urgent remedial action, the
total will almost certainly be much more, proportionally far
exceeding that of any other G8 country. We are on course to spend
annually a greater sum on interest payments (£43 billion in 2010-11)
than on defence. [And that’s an ANNUAL cost -cs]
Even the Treasury Select Committee, with its Labour majority, has
lost faith in the Brown-Darling magic show. The old tricks no longer
fool the audience. The MPs say that the Chancellor is "too
optimistic". The unpalatable truth is that unless the Prime Minister
discovers a thick seam of gold running under Whitehall, we will all
be required to work longer and harder and save more.
State spending must be cut – there cannot simply be a slowing of
growth – and tax increases reversed. Hitting the so-called rich with
a new top rate generates precious little, except a vindictive smile
from Harriet Harman. History tells us that higher earners pay more in
taxes when rates are low. Even the Treasury expects two thirds of
those in the new 50 per cent band to find ways of dodging it. Set
against the Chancellor's annual expenditure of £671 billion, the sums
involved are tiny, probably less than £1 billion. It is, in effect,
an envy tax.
A Cabinet minister once told me that this Government will never get
to grips with the pensions crisis because it involves telling people
that they must endure pain today for jam tomorrow, precisely the
opposite of what Mr Brown and his acolytes regard as the recipe for
self-preservation. They will always try to buy time with taxpayers'
money. Unfortunately, both are running out.
At the next PMQs, Conservative participants should remember that.
========================================
A VERSE FOR OUR TIMES - from the 1930s
"There are Bad Times Just Around The Corner" -Noel Coward
Verse 2
From Portland Bill to Scarborough
They're querulous and subdued
And Shropshire lads
Have behaved like cads
From Berwick-on-Tweed to Bude,
They're mad at Market Harborough
And livid at Leigh-on-Sea,
In Tunbridge Wells
You can hear the yells
Of woe-begone bourgeoisie.
We all get bitched about, lads,
Whoever our vote elects,
We know we're up the spout, lads.
And that's what England expects.
Hurray-hurray-hurray!
Trouble is on the way.
Refrain 2
There are bad times just around the corner,
The horizon's gloomy as can be,
There are black birds over
The grayish cliffs of Dover
And the rats are preparing to leave the B.B.C.
We're an unhappy breed
And very bored indeed
When reminded of something that Nelson said.
While the press and the politicians nag nag nag
We'll wait until we drop down dead.
Friday, 8 May 2009
This is no time for Tory jokes - we're galloping into a mega-crisis
Attacking Labour policies and not the personalities will seal Gordon
Brown's fate, argues Jeff Randall.
For once, Gordon Brown got it right. Don't laugh, he really did. At
this week's Prime Minister's Questions, the Weary One scolded his
Conservative tormentors for playing the man (him) instead of the ball
(government policy).
Posted by Britannia Radio at 12:56