Saturday, 16 May 2009

The uncertain noises coming  
from the Bank of England. It's sobering in its implications.  And  
remember - to put it in perspective - this corner alone  deals in  
sums  (£125 bn out of a total indebtedness like to reach £800 bn)  
that is nearly one million times greater than all the thievery and  
trickery of MPs put together.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CS
=============================
TELEGRAPH 15.5.09n UK

Mervyn's strangely serene despite our worrying similarities to Zimbabwe
To the casual observer this hardly seems the most relaxing time to be  
Governor of the Bank of England.

By Edmund Conway

You are at the helm of the economy as we plough into the worst  
recession in living memory; the financial system has still far from  
recovered and the housing market is embroiled in a crash.

And yet, there was something rather serene about Mervyn King and the 
Bank yesterday.

Interest rates are as near as they can be to zero; most banks that 
are in trouble have been saved from collapse; the very worst of the 
economic contraction is probably behind us. So, are we about to 
return to boring monetary policy?

No. Sadly, this is only the eye of the storm, for both the Bank and  
the economy.

Hanging over the Inflation Report, alongside the gloomy prospects for 
growth and inflation, was the question of exit strategy. For generals 
and armies, the exit is usually something to look forward to. For 
central banks it is something to be dreaded.


Cutting interest rates is far easier than raising them. And when you 
are talking about unwinding £125bn or more worth of quantitative 
easing, the task takes on a rather terrifying aspect. When you 
consider that the Bank is going to have to try to sell off a large 
portion of these gilts at the very same time as the Government is 
itself issuing enough debt to pay for a World War, the full nightmare 
in prospect for the central bank next year becomes apparent.

It is a nasty dilemma for an independent central bank. Given that the 
Bank is printing money and buying gilts, the main thing that 
separates us from our Zimbabwean counterparts is that the Bank is not 
doing so expressly in order to keep the Government afloat. It is 
doing so because this is the best mechanism to pour cash into the 
economy.

However, it is difficult to see how this independence cannot be  
undermined when, next year or the year after, the Bank finally has to  
sell these gilts off. At that stage, with markets already engorged  
with UK government debt, the Bank risks setting off a capital strike  
by pouring more of them out there.

This would have severe economic consequences for the UK, so it ought  
to be in the Bank's interests to avoid such an eventuality. But give  
the markets any impression that you are complicitly financing the  
Government's deficit and you risk setting off a hyperinflationary  
crisis of the likes we have never before seen.

No wonder King is kicking back in the meantime. Unfortunately, when  
people asked the Governor precisely how he intends to tackle this  
dilemma, he was blissfully unclear about it. The Bank needs to  
clarify how it intends to extricate itself from this uncomfortable  
hole as soon as possible.