Undisclosed past found in archive Two of the biggest names in the City of London had previously undisclosed links to slavery in the British colonies, documents seen by the Financial Times have revealed - Jun-26 Two of the biggest names in the City of London had previously undisclosed links to slavery in the British colonies, documents seen by the Financial Times have revealed. Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the banking family’s 19th-century patriarch, and James William Freshfield, founder of Freshfields, the top City law firm, benefited financially from slavery, records from the National Archives show, even though both have often been portrayed as opponents of slavery. By Carola Hoyos Published: June 26 2009 23:32 | Last updated: June 26 2009 23:32 Two of the biggest names in the City of London had previously undisclosed links to slavery in the British colonies, documents seen by the Financial Times have revealed. Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the banking family’s 19th-century patriarch, and James William Freshfield, founder of Freshfields, the top City law firm, benefited financially from slavery, records from the National Archives show, even though both have often been portrayed as opponents of slavery. Far from being a matter of distant history, slavery remains a highly contentious issue in the US, where Rothschild and Freshfields are both active. Companies alleged to have links to past slave injustices have come under pressure to make restitution. JPMorgan, the investment bank, set up a $5m scholarship fund for black students studying in Louisiana after apologising in 2005 for the company’s historic links to slavery. The archival documents have already prompted one of the banks named in the records to take action in the US. When the FT approached Royal Bank of Scotland with information about its predecessor’s links with slavery, the bank researched the claim, updated its own archives and amended the disclosures of past slave connections that it had previously lodged with the Chicago authorities. But it is the disclosures about Mr Rothschild and Mr Freshfield that are likely to prompt the biggest stir. In the case of Mr Rothschild, the documents reveal for the first time that he made personal gains by using slaves as collateral in banking dealings with a slave owner. This will surprise those familiar with his role in organising the loan that funded the UK government’s bail-out of British slave owners when colonial slavery was abolished in the 1830s. It was the biggest bail-out of an industry as a percentage of annual government expenditure – dwarfing last year’s rescue of the banking sector. The chief archivist of the Rothschild family papers, Melanie Aspey, reacted with disbelief when first told of the contents of the records, saying she had never seen such links before. Niall Ferguson, Laurence A.Tisch professor of history at Harvard and author ofThe World’s Banker: A History of the House of Rothschild, said the documents showed “how pervasive slavery was in the structure of British wealth in 1830”. In Mr Freshfield’s case, the records reveal that he and his sons had several slave-owner clients, mostly based in the Caribbean. The lawyers acted as trustees of the owners’ estates and in one case tried to claim unpaid legal fees for the firm through the government scheme set up to compensate owners after abolition. Nick Draper, a University College London academic who examined the documents, which will now form the basis of a comprehensive British slavery database at UCL, said the records would hopefully promote a better understanding of of the significance of slavery in Britain. “We need to fill the gaps between those who deny slavery’s role and those who believe Britain was built entirely on the blood of slaves,” he said. Both Rothschild, the bank, and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer were quick to point to their predecessors’ anti-slavery credentials. Rothschild said Nathan Mayer Rothschild had been a prominent civil liberties campaigner with many like-minded associates and “against this background, these allegations appear inconsistent and misrepresent the ethos of the man and his business”. Freshfields said James William Freshfield was an active member of the Church Missionary Society, “which was committed to ... the abolition of the slave trade”. Apologies and acknowledgements Several institutions have apologised for, or acknowledged, their links to slavery including: ●In March 2002, Deadria C. Farmer-Paellmann, a lawyer and activist, launched an unsuccessful legal action against Aetna , a healthcare benefits company, and others for unjust enrichment through slavery. Legislation in California and Illinois prompted several companies to research their past and some to apologise and make atonement gestures. ●In mid-2000 Aetna, prompted by Ms Farmer-Paellmann, was one of the first to apologise for insurance policies written on slaves 140 years earlier. ●In 2002, New York Life, the insurer, donated documents about the insurance it sold to slave owners in the 1840s to a New York library. It also backed educational efforts. ●In 2005 JPMorgan, the investment bank, apologised that two of its predecessors in Louisiana – Citizens Bank and Canal Bank – had mortgaged slaves. The bank made its research public and set up a $5m scholarship fund for African- American pupils. ●Lehman Brothers apologised in 2005 for its predecessors’ links to slavery, while Bank of America said it regretted any actions its predecessors might have taken to support or tolerate slavery. Wachovia Bank, since acquired by Wells Fargo, also apologised for its predecessors having owned and profited from slaves. It set up a programme offering $1bn in loans for black car dealerships. ●In October 2001 students at Yale University pointed out its past links with slavery. The university noted it had already founded the Gilder-Lehrman centre for the study of slavery. Brown University has set up a commission to look into links with slavery and how it should make amends. ●In 2006 Tony Blair, prime minister, expressed “deep sorrow” for the UK’s role in the slave trade. ●Last week the US Senate unanimously passed a resolution apologising for slavery and segregation. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009
Rothschild and Freshfields founders had links to slavery, papers reveal
Rothschild and Freshfields founders had links to slavery, papers reveal
Rothschild and Freshfields founders had links to slavery, papers reveal
Rothschild and Freshfields founders had links to slavery, papers reveal
Britain loses moral high ground
Regimes seize on MPs’ expenses scandal
- In depth UK parliamentary expenses
- Analysis The state of Britain
- The UK government in crisis
Brussels may press UK banks to sell units
Kroes suggests disposals possible
FRIDAY, 26 JUNE 2009
Infosys chairman to run India ID card scheme
(By Anthony Miller – Friday 26th June 2009 8:15am).Infosys co-founder and co-chairman, Nandan Nilekani, is to step down from the board next month to take charge as the Chairperson of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), in the rank of Cabinet Minister. The Indian government has set aside around $20m this FY to kick off the scheme, which will provide social-security like numbering and smartcards to all of India’s 1.1b citizens. Nilekani is reported as saying that he expects the first ID cards to be issued within 12-18 months.Now there’s obviously several stories here, but for now I will just comment on the more ‘superficial’ one, and that is the changing of the guard at Infosys. One of the many aspects I have always liked about Infosys (besides margins to die for) is the constant promotion of senior management into top positions in the company. When I met Nilekani in my first jaw-dropping visit to Infosys’ Bangalore campus in 2000, he was COO. He was promoted to CEO in 2002 and handed over the reins to co-founder ‘Kris’ Gopalakrishnan in 2007 to ascend to the co-chairmanship of the Board. I think this top management ‘churn’ is very healthy in a fast growing company, but of course the real test will be whether Infosys will eventually appoint someone outside of the co-founder ranks to become CEO when Kris eventually moves on (and, I assume, up). But ambitious senior managers can see that, in Infosys at least, top executive positions are potentially attainable.
Posts
