Monday, 1 June 2009

This is another example of the critical damage the Telegraph's  
scurrilous campaign is doing to our country.  The paper is  
deliberately dragging it out to cause the maximum distraction and  
filling its columns with trivia.  The juicy plums of real corruption  
are strictly rationed and well spaced.

They are so overloading public awareness that any MP mentioned is  
assumed "guilty" merely for being mentioned.  The criminally culpable  
are equated with the foolish and the greedy are not distinguished  
from those quite legitimately claiming for the extra costs of living  
in two places and working in both.

Meanwhile the country's economy is continuing to collapse, the  
politicians are not in charge and  the media have forgotten all about  
that - IT'S BORING!

xxxxxxxxxxxx cs
====================================
FINANCIAL TIMES 1.6.09
MPs' expenses are distraction from recession
By Jean Eaglesham and Jim Pickard

The furore over MPs' expenses is proving a damaging distraction from 
the serious economic questions that need to be addressed by all the 
main political parties, business leaders have warned.

Employers are becoming alarmed that measures to fight the recession 
are being neglected as Westminster's focus turns inwards.

The scandal continued to cause political ructions on Sunday night as 
new questions were raised over the expenses of Alistair Darling, who 
as chancellor is in charge of the UK's public finances.

The Telegraph claimed that Mr Darling submitted a claim in July 2007 
for a £1,004 service charge for his south London flat - which he 
rented out for part of the period - while he was also claiming 
allowances for his free apartment in Downing Street.

Mr Darling's spokeswoman did not return the FT's calls on Sunday night.
Richard Lambert, director-general of the CBI, told the Financial 
Times: "I've just been talking to business people in Brussels and the 
sense of bewilderment about what's happening and what it means for 
the UK and Europe is palpable.
"We've got important elections [this week] and they are being 
completely overshadowed by these disclosures."

Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg have been forced to 
prioritise plans to overhaul the Commons and discipline errant MPs, 
forcing economic and public policy on to the backburner. The local 
and European elections on Thursday will be heavily influenced by 
voters' feelings about MPs' greed.

How Mr Brown handles the fate of Mr Darling, a close friend and 
political ally, will be closely watched in the coming days.

"Clearly there's an enormous, understandable public outrage...but 
we've got big decisions to be taken by all the big political parties 
about the future shape and role of the state, and these have been 
completely brushed to one side," Mr Lambert said.

Gordon Brown insisted he would not step down as prime minister even 
if dire Labour results on Thursday prompted senior colleagues to call 
for his resignation.

Some opinion polls have put the party neck-and-neck with Ukip, the 
fringe anti-Brussels party. Another poll on Sunday by ICM suggested 
Labour support had fallen behind the Liberal Democrats for the first 
time in 22 years.

Mr Brown is almost certain to execute a reshuffle if the election 
results are disastrous for Labour. A radical shake-up could see Lord 
Mandelson promoted to foreign secretary and the demotion of Mr 
Darling, in spite of his calm handling of the economic downturn.

One Whitehall insider told the FT that Yvette Cooper, chief secretary 
to the Treasury, was likely to be promoted to the cabinet, perhaps 
replacing Hazel Blears, communities secretary.

The sense of a government in limbo was reinforced by the EEF 
manufacturers' body, which said it regretted the shift of the 
political agenda from the economy to parliamentary reform.
"The next six or seven months will be of absolutely crucial 
importance for manufacturers, and the government should be focusing 
on that," said Chris Hannant at the EEF.

Stephen Alambritis, of the Federation of Small Businesses, said: 
"There's still a recession, people are still losing their jobs and 
small businesses are closing down every day and we would rather 
politicians were concentrating on that."
===============================
EUREFERENDUM Blog 1.6.09
Giving them a kicking

The election turnout next Thursday could either have nose dived, as 
people walked away from the election process as a whole, or they 
could flock to the polls as a protest vote. We wonder which way it 
would go, but now The Times seems to be pointing the way.

Relying on its Populus poll, it is suggesting that we might make 41 
percent, up on the 38 percent in 2004, itself higher than the 
previous poll. That is completely bucking the general EU trend, with 
turn outs of 12 percent expected in member states such as Latvia.

There is no doubt as to why the British euro-elections have suddenly 
become so popular - and it has nothing to do with a sudden enthusiasm 
for MEPs. Simply, nearly four out of ten voters have decided to give 
their domestic politicians a kicking, the only way they can short of 
a lynching.

With UKIP leading the polls of the tiddlers - depending on which 
polls to take notice of - an exercise which the "colleagues" would 
love to think is the ultimate expression of confidence in the project 
is descending into pure farce. To protest against corrupt politicians 
in Britain, voters are set on sending even more corrupt politicians 
to Brussels, where the gravy train is even richer and the pickings 
easier.

There is no logic to this, and there is every logic to it. Since the 
whole exercise of sending MEPs to Brussels is meaningless, the voter 
reasons that they might just as well make the best of it and use the 
election for a purpose not intended.

When the results come in, they will be just as meaningless - a 
protest vote that will have no effect whatsoever on the domestic 
scene, as Brown battens down the hatches and stays in office for the 
full term.

Somehow, though, as even the saintly Mr Cameron is smeared, politics 
will never be the same. Estate agents will never, ever again be at 
the bottom of the popularity stakes.
--------------------------------
Posted by Richard North