Sunday, 7 June 2009

..................A victim of Brown's temper and vengefulness.



AND SUGAR HAS TAKEN 30 SHEKELS OF SILVER FROM THIS MAN 

OR PETER MANDELSON!

We have to get rid of the man for  he’s clearly unhinged.  But he  
also is a continuing disaster for Britain. Nothing else is as important

Most of you know of Ruth Lea and you know of her total integrity.

=================================
CONSERVATIVE HOME             7.6.09
    - Centre Right

        Posted by Ruth Lea
Gordon Brown never was fit for Number10
As we await the EU election results with baited breath, the pressure 
is mounting on Gordon Brown to quit. Of course he must quit and, of 
course, there must be a general election as soon as is possible. The 
sense of drift and disintegration at the heart of Government is 
deeply damaging to this country. We need a new Government and, 
speaking as a loyal member of the Conservative Party for many years, 
we need a Conservative Government!

As the pressure on him to quit increases, so the tally of articles 
and leaked e-mails discussing his character defects increases. We 
hear of his temper, his intolerance of dissent, his character 
assassination, and his manipulative, scheming ways. Well there’s a 
surprise. There are many of us who have known about it for years.

Several years ago and when I was still Head of the Policy Unit at the 
IoD, I think it was in 2001, I was a member of the IoD’s team which 
went to see the Chancellor at the Treasury to discuss our Budget 
Representations. All went swimmingly until the Chancellor asked our 
Director-General what IoD members thought about his policies. The DG 
made a feeble response and handed the question over to me. I replied 
along the lines of “…some of your policies have been very well 
received – but others less so. The increased employment regulations, 
for example, can prove very difficult for small businesses.”     
“Which ones?” the Chancellor demanded. “Several. But the Working 
Families Tax Credit, and I understand your reasons for introducing 
it, can prove especially difficult.”

He blew up. No fuse. Just blew up. Didn’t I realise why he had 
introduced it (I’d just said that I did)? …didn’t I this? …didn’t I 
that? …didn’t I the other? And so this curious tirade went on for 
what seemed like an eternity. I have never encountered anything like 
it in my life and hope I never will again. The man was out of 
control. Then he suddenly took a grip on himself and we went back to 
discussing the Budget. Surreal. At the end of the meeting he turned 
to the DG and said that he was sorry he’d lost his temper. The DG 
graciously accepted the apology. The Chancellor ignored me.

I should have realised at this point that I had become ‘persona non 
grata’ at Gordon’s court. But I have to admit that I didn’t. Gordon’s 
court was, of course, a staggeringly influential one – all powerful. 
For domestic affairs he was the de facto ‘prime minister’ with much 
of the rest of Whitehall, including the DTI, vassal states.

As the months went by it was increasingly obvious that Government 
pressure was being put on the IoD “to cooperate, if not collaborate” 
with Government in order to be “influential”. It must stop being 
“political”, i.e. criticising the Government. The senior management 
were only too willing to comply and the DG, in particular, was 
evermore fulsome in his praise for the Chancellor. The 2002 Budget 
was a case in point. The DG welcomed it wholeheartedly despite the 
Chancellor’s decision to increase taxes on business by around £5bn in 
order to pay for his spending spree – a fact he conveniently 
overlooked! My presence at the IoD was increasingly inconvenient.

So I was sacked, amid rumours put around by the DG that I was 
“mentally unstable”. Nice one. I wonder where that idea came from! 
Fortunately there were many people, including those at the Centre for 
Policy Studies, who supported me at the time. I shall be eternally 
grateful to them.

The squalid little affair of my sacking, including the evidence I 
obtained through the Data Protection Act which proved the DTI’s 
involvement, was brilliantly reported by Peter Oborne in a couple of 
articles in May 2004. I have little to add, except two things. The 
first was that I asked the DTI for follow-up information through the 
Freedom of Information Act. My request was rejected on the grounds 
the information was classified. Speaking as an ex-civil servant this 
is simply not credible. And, secondly, the senior management of the 
IoD were well rewarded. The DG received his knighthood and the 
Chairman his OBE.

Doubtless politics has always had its dark side. But the depths to 
which it has sunk over the last 12 years under New Labour has been 
unprecedented in this country. Of all the legacies left by this 
Government the poisoning of political discourse is surely the worst. 
Gordon Brown, foul-tempered and intolerant, has been at the very 
centre of this mess.

Gordon Brown never was fit for Number 10 and, given the wreckage of 
the economy, the public finances and the financial regulatory system, 
was never fit for Number 11 either.