|
| |
| COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA |   |
Amanpour Strikes Again: Blames Israel and Exonerates the PalestiniansAug 19, 2009
|
Please click here to support CAMERA's vital work! |
| IN BRIEF | to / Top / In Detail / Action Item |
| Shalom CAMERA E-Mail Team: What did Christiane Amanpour hope to accomplish in her CNN Special Generation Islam? It was supposed to be, as she described it, an investigation of the battle between extremists and moderates for the "hearts and minds" of young Muslims, especially in Afghanistan and Gaza. While such a program might have been interesting, unfortunately it's not what Amanpour actually presented. Instead, viewers were fed the usual Amanpour propaganda, especially in the second hour, where the subject might have been Gaza but the target was clearly Israel. The contrast in the two parts of the program could not have been more striking. The first hour, on Afghanistan, identified the good guys as those fighting to create a more tolerant form of Islam, those building schools and encouraging girls to get an education. Amanpour, for example, rhapsodically described Greg Mortenson, who was said to have helped build 79 schools in the country, as "one of America's least likely, but most successful counter-insurgents ... one of America's most successful fighters against extremism." The bad guys, just as clearly, were the Islamists, the hard line Taliban, the brutal backward criminals who destroy schools, and kill girls for trying to get an education. But in the second hour, on Gaza, the bad guys were not the Islamists who rule Gaza, teaching hatred of Christians and Jews, and attacking Israeli civilians with thousands of rockets. Instead Amanpour's bad guys were the Jews of Israel, for supposedly oppressing the Palestinians, and she offered not a single mention of the hate indoctrination that Hamas specializes in. While Amanpour showed in great detail the suffering of people in Gaza, only once, and perfunctorily, did she give a hint of why they might be at least partially responsible for their own misery. Amanpour also falsely claimed that there are no movie theaters and no sports centers in Gaza, and allowed guests to make absurd claims such as that in Gaza there is no water, electricity or fuel. Another guest was allowed to make the bizarre claim that there is nothing radical or extremist about the Gaza's Hamas-run Islamic University. And while in the Afghanistan segment Amanpour briefly mentions civilian deaths caused by American attacks (the word "killed" is used twice in this regard), in the Gaza segment she has long conversations with Gazans who explain how Israel killed their loved ones. Not surprisingly, in the Gaza segment the word "killed" is used in this way seven times. | |
| ACTION ITEMS | to / Top / In Brief / Action Item |
| Please use the information in the alert as background for your own letter. Do not copy and paste directly from the alert and do not forward it to the media. • Please call CNN at (404) 827-1500 and ask for President Jon Klein and/or Executive Vice President (Standards and Practices) Rick Davis, and leave a message telling them what you thought of Amanpour's program. You can mention a few of the serious errors and misrepresentations. • Please leave a comment at the CNN comment form by clicking here. Again, you can list a few of the errors and misrepresentations. You will need to fill in the website address for the program. It is | |
| IN DETAIL | to / Top / In Brief / Action Item |
| Christiane Amanpour described the focus of her program with these words:
Spending the first hour on Afghanistan, Amanpour explained that the people are justifiably:
But while Amanpour is certainly correct to excoriate the Taliban, she once again betrays a complete misunderstanding of Islamism, and the threats that it poses. At one point, for example, she criticizes madrassas (religious-based schools) in Pakistan and Afghanistan, stating:
But learning math or science is hardly a guarantee against Islamic extremism. For example, many of the 9/11 hijackers were quite well educated, with the ringleader, Mohamed Atta, having earned a masters degree in architecture in Germany. Indeed, as the Princeton historian Sean Wilentz remarked, judging by the 9/11 attacks, terrorism is caused not by poverty or ignorance, but by "money, education and privilege." Furthermore, contrary to Amanpour, knowledge of math and science actually makes terrorists more dangerous. Some sources, for example, report that Osama bin Laden himself has a degree in civil engineering, and there is no doubt he was exposed to the subject through his family's enormously successful construction firm. Which led him to understand that crashing a fuel-laden passenger jet into a metal framed skyscraper might well melt support beams and collapse at least part of the building. Here is bin Laden in his own words describing this:
So the issue is not going to a modern well-equipped school, or living in a prosperous society, it is what is actually taught to young Muslim students about non-Muslims and their place in the world. Students who are taught that Islam should be the dominant religion and culture in the world, and that followers of other religions must submit to the Muslims, will be predisposed to bringing this supposed utopia about, by whatever means are necessary. Young Muslims who are taught to hate and fear Christians and Jews will easily fall prey to the siren call of a bin Laden or of Hamas. Unfortunately Amanpour is willing to confront none of this reality, which was especially evident in the second hour of the program, focusing on Gaza. Here, suddenly, the bad guys were not the Islamists who rule Gaza, and who teach hatred of Christians and Jews. Instead Amanpour's bad guys were the Jews of Israel, for supposedly oppressing the Palestinians. Thus, while showing in great detail the suffering of people in Gaza, only once, and perfunctorily, does Amanpour give a hint of why they might be at least partially responsible for their own misery:
That's it – never more did Amanpour even mention the attacks that Hamas and allied militias in Gaza have launched against Israeli civilians. Never in the program did she interview or even mention any specific Israeli victims of Palestinian terrorism from Gaza. Never did she point out that Gaza also has a border with Egypt, meaning that Israel couldn't make Gaza into a "virtual prison" even had it wanted to. Despite lingering over scenes of destroyed Palestinian buildings in Gaza, there was not one hint of destruction in Israel, there was not one hint that missile attacks from Gaza had forced hundred of thousands of Israelis to live in underground shelters for weeks at a time. Instead viewers heard from one Palestinian victim after another with not even the suggestion that perhaps voting for Hamas might have worsened their suffering. Amanpour also allows ridiculous claims from her guests, and adds a few of her own. One Palestinian, for example, is allowed to claim that in Gaza there is "no water, no electricity, no fuel, no work, no life, no hope." If there is no water, what exactly do Palestinians drink, and how do they grow the citrus that is their main agricultural crop? Did Amanpour ever stop to think that Gaza exists because it is an oasis sitting on top of a major aquifer? Because Gaza farmers waste huge amounts of water, there are shortages and quality problems. But it's ridiculous to say there is no water. And if there is no electricity, what powers the lights that are clearly seen in some of the scenes in Gaza? If there is no fuel, what powers the car that picks up Amanpour at the border as she enters Gaza, and what powers the other cars that are plainly seen to be moving in the streets of Gaza? If there's no work, might that be the fault of Gaza's radical rulers, who would rather engage in attacking Israel than attacking unemployment? Amanpour adds to the disinformation. After admitting that "Hamas' hard-line stance further isolated its people," a few moments later she charges that:
No movie theaters? Actually, as NPR (of all outlets) reported, a new theater, called Horst Park Cinema, opened in 2004. So Amanpour is wrong again. But why had there been no theater before that? Had the cruel Israelis destroyed it? Not exactly. According to the NPR report:
So it was the hard-liners of Hamas that destroyed the movie theater. And are there no sports centers? Well, here's a recent picture of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh playing soccer in one of the supposedly non-existent Gaza sports centers:
When Amanpour does briefly admit that Hamas has "openly promoted a culture of violence" and presents "suicide bombers as heroes," she immediately has on Hamas leader Ahmed Yousef, who explains that it is all the fault of the Israelis:
Amanpour, of course, offers no challenge to this rewriting of history. She is at her most compliant, however, when it comes to the institution that is perhaps the crown jewel of Hamas, the Islamic University in Gaza. She tells viewers that the university was founded by Hamas, which is not exactly true – it was founded long before Hamas existed by Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, who later also founded Hamas. Interviewing a student at the university, Nasser, Amanpour puts it him that it is:
Amanpour offers no challenge to this idyllic portrait of the Islamic University. Is that what it's really like? Well, here are some facts about the Islamic University that Christiane Amanpour evidently missed. Just a few months ago, in April, the Islamic University hosted a festival commemorating the founder of Hamas, Sheikh Ahmad Yassin. One of the dramas included in the festival featured a "Jewish" father instructing his son that Jews drink the blood of Muslims:
After Hurricane Katrina caused so much destruction in the United States in 2005, the head of the Department of History and Archeology at Islamic University, Dr. Khaled Al-Khaledi, rejoiced at America's tragedy:
In a report about the Islamic University entitled "Palestinian University Owes Much to Hamas," the Baltimore Sun quoted Jameela El Shanty, a professor of education at the school and also a member of the Palestinian parliament, as saying:
Sheikh Dr. Nizar Rayyan was killed during the fighting earlier this year between Israel and Hamas. He was regarded as the spiritual mentor of Hamas's military arm, the Iz A-Din Al Qassam Brigades, and he also had extremely close ties to the Islamic University, according to a report from the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism:
The ICT report also pointed out that the University's labs were used to perfect Hamas weapons that were used to attack Israeli civilians:
Said Siyam, who was in charge of Internal Affairs and National Security for Hamas, and who was killed in the recent fighting in Gaza, was also closely tied to the Islamic University. According to an ICT report:
In fact, according to a report in the Washington Times:
This is the university that Amanpour allows to be portrayed on CNN as a place that merely teaches English and human rights, with "nothing related to radicalism." Is this the kind of school that Amanpour praised in Afghanistan, or is it closer to the madrassas that she so heavily criticized? Why the different approach? Is it just that the Gaza university, and its Hamas masters, consider Israel their avowed enemy? Why would that garner special favor from Amanpour? | |
Thursday, 20 August 2009
Posts
