Reading this article about changes in the Taliban leadership I was struck by the way the language tends to validate them as an organisation. We are told:
The Taliban are pleased to announce...
>> SATURDAY, AUGUST 22, 2009
Pakistan's Taliban movement has named a new leader, its deputy head Maulvi Faqir Mohammed has told the BBC. He said Hakimullah Mehsud, a close associate of ex-leader Baitullah Mehsud, had been unanimously appointed at a meeting in northern Pakistan.
So, the "deputy-head" announces that "a close associate" of the "ex-leader" has been "unanimously" "appointed". It sounds like a union movement, rather than a bunch of bearded desperate goons with ieds and the education levels of ten year olds except no doubt for their memorisation of the Koran.
Richard North of excellent EU Referendum has been railing at the BBC for a different reason- suggesting that they whitewashed corruption in the Afghan election. Rather than just spotty as the BBC claim, he believes them to be worthless. Whatevever works for you when it comes to cynicism, but surely this illustrates how things are with the BBC- they do the British Government a small favour with a few apparently white lies in the name of furthering democracy, and then tell massive whoppers by covering for the enemies of the West. In hoc to the politicians on the one hand, and to their own ideology on the other- where does that leave the paying British public? According to the BBC, claims that the Taliban has been at war with itself following the loss of their leader were just "rumours", while the unanimous election of the new Taliban leader... totally Halal mate, straight down the line, fair dinkum and jolly hockey sticks, hurrah.
Saturday, 22 August 2009
Posts
