Friday 11 September 2009

 can't see links on this page, go to http://www.out-law.com/roundup/20090910.html

 

OUT-LAW.COM: IT & e-commerce legal help from international law firm Pinsent Masons

Hi, here is your weekly round-up of highlights from OUT-LAW News. As always, there are plenty of other stories from this week. You can also access our archive of weekly emails.

This week's news on OUT-LAW.COM

ECJ says online retailers can almost never charge for use made of returned goods

Online retailers can only charge a consumer for the use they made of a product which they then returned if it was used in bad faith or for 'unjust enrichment', the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has said.
10/09/2009

Getty Images wins £2,000 settlement over unauthorised web use of photo

A removals firm has been ordered to pay nearly £2,000 to photographic agency Getty Images for using a copyright-protected photograph on its website. The company had removed the picture when notified by Getty but had not paid a requested fee.
10/09/2009

Former employee who emailed company info to himself breached database rights, High Court rules

The founder of a conferencing business breached his former employer's database rights and misappropriated its confidential information, the High Court has said.
08/09/2009

Over half of Europe's electronics retail sites break the law, says Commission

An investigation of hundreds of European websites selling electronics has found that 55% of them appear to break consumer protection laws. Those sites are under further investigation, the European Commission has said.
09/09/2009

EU firms 'hesitant' to go to China over IP worries, says EU trade chief

European companies are hesitant to do business in China because of fears that their intellectual property will not be protected, according to the European Union's Trade Commissioner Catherine Ashton.
09/09/2009

Web hosts face payout as jury says they should have known about customers' infringement

Two web hosting companies have been ordered to pay $32 million in damages after failing to convince a US jury that they were immune from responsibility for their users' actions.
07/09/2009