u-tube is on the top rt hand corner.
Vote early and vote often - so they say, but:
This referendum vote in Ireland has apparently gone from a definite and
resounding "NO" vote which was rather looking that way earlier on and all
over for the "YES" side, and then miraculously, was it three or four days
before the actual vote, it seemed that the terrible anger of the people of
Ireland at having to vote again and with so many people from the EU
Commission and so much money used in the yes campaign, that anger melted
away into absolute JOY at being able to vote for what they had secretly
always wanted, to be part of a militarized European Union.
A mistaken vote "NO" last time? Could the resounding "NO" last time really
have been changed into such a resounding YES in the way that it was? All the
people at the same time suddenly deciding that they wanted to please the
Irish Taoiseach, I do not think so. This change did not happen in every
county did it? Was their some Counties that still produced a "NO"? Now why
were they so different from the rest? Or miraculously did every one
suddenly want to be right at the heart of the European Union? THE PEOPLE
WERE CONDITIONED TO BELIEVE THAT THE "no" VOTE HAD BEEN LOST, particularly
the remaining Countries in the EU. It is the easiest of brain washing
techniques, but was it the brainwashing of the media and the outside world
to believe the result? To get the other two main Countries to throw in the
towel? Didn't you see it coming? I am sorry, if that film is fact, at the
slightest deviation from the laid down rules all should have been stamped on
right a way and the referendum postponed until another day. They should not
just have filmed what seemed to be going on, those carrying those boxes
should have been challenged there and then-what an opportunity missed? If
up to tricks they would have dropped the boxes and ran off. Proof-if the
film is true. You see, it could all have been play acting just to make the
film unless you can provide other proof? What should happen now if the
film is genuine, has to be a legal challenge or whatever it is in Ireland,
and further 'proof' or a confession. Perhaps I really am getting old after
all, but I have seen it all before you see. I have read the same kind of
con, day after day for about ten years now, you recognize the words coming
before the eyes even rest on the pages. But sadly, I have also seen "the
put up job" too. That is why proof is needed. Everyone is innocent in my
book until proven guilty. Anne (But remember the Tami-flu saga?)
resounding "NO" vote which was rather looking that way earlier on and all
over for the "YES" side, and then miraculously, was it three or four days
before the actual vote, it seemed that the terrible anger of the people of
Ireland at having to vote again and with so many people from the EU
Commission and so much money used in the yes campaign, that anger melted
away into absolute JOY at being able to vote for what they had secretly
always wanted, to be part of a militarized European Union.
A mistaken vote "NO" last time? Could the resounding "NO" last time really
have been changed into such a resounding YES in the way that it was? All the
people at the same time suddenly deciding that they wanted to please the
Irish Taoiseach, I do not think so. This change did not happen in every
county did it? Was their some Counties that still produced a "NO"? Now why
were they so different from the rest? Or miraculously did every one
suddenly want to be right at the heart of the European Union? THE PEOPLE
WERE CONDITIONED TO BELIEVE THAT THE "no" VOTE HAD BEEN LOST, particularly
the remaining Countries in the EU. It is the easiest of brain washing
techniques, but was it the brainwashing of the media and the outside world
to believe the result? To get the other two main Countries to throw in the
towel? Didn't you see it coming? I am sorry, if that film is fact, at the
slightest deviation from the laid down rules all should have been stamped on
right a way and the referendum postponed until another day. They should not
just have filmed what seemed to be going on, those carrying those boxes
should have been challenged there and then-what an opportunity missed? If
up to tricks they would have dropped the boxes and ran off. Proof-if the
film is true. You see, it could all have been play acting just to make the
film unless you can provide other proof? What should happen now if the
film is genuine, has to be a legal challenge or whatever it is in Ireland,
and further 'proof' or a confession. Perhaps I really am getting old after
all, but I have seen it all before you see. I have read the same kind of
con, day after day for about ten years now, you recognize the words coming
before the eyes even rest on the pages. But sadly, I have also seen "the
put up job" too. That is why proof is needed. Everyone is innocent in my
book until proven guilty. Anne (But remember the Tami-flu saga?)
Add on. If there is PROOF, and you need PROOF and you need proof that people will swear so in court that the boxes did not go by the (legal/lawfully) authorized route and/or at the right time, there is every likelihood that there could be a challenge. Can you see any of the people's faces? Were any of them known to anyone? Would the police who SHOULD have delivered the boxes at a certain time and place, confirm they did so? Are the times and dates logged? would they explain in a Court if they did or did not deliver them on the said time and date? Can they be summons to go to court? Was it just one place? Or, was it all over the Island of Ireland? Come on, let us have some answers on a big thing like this. Proof PLEASE.
xxxxxxxxxxxxx a
Posts
