Yes, you read that right. It was by Harold Evans, the legendary ex-editor of the Sunday Times. Evans concluded his piece about the ‘moral atrocity’ of the Goldstone report thus: The rockets [from Gaza] were war crimes and ought to have been universally condemned as such. While new rockets hit Israel over many months there was no rush by the world’s moralisers – including Britain – to censure Hamas, no urgency as there was in ‘world opinion’ when Israel finally responded. Then Israel was immediately accused of a ‘disproportionate’ response without anyone thinking: ‘What is a “proportionate”attack against an enemy dedicated to exterminating your people?’ A dedication to exterminating all of his? Israel risked its own forces by imposing unprecedented restraint. In testimony There are countries in the world that are happy with what they have, that aren't interested in expansion or intruding on their neighbors and basically just want to be left on their own. Then there One of the principal sources of gross smears and distortions about Israel is the prominent NGO Human Rights Watch. It has always swatted away any such charge as an example of pro-Israel special pleading. But now it has been denounced by someone it will find less easy to dismiss in this way – its very own founder. In the New York Times Robert Bernstein, who founded HRW and chaired it for more than 20 years, delivers the devastating verdict that through its reporting of Israel it has lost sight of its founding mission to ‘to pry open closed societies, advocate basic freedoms and support dissenters’: Now the organization, with increasing frequency, casts aside its important distinction between open and closed societies. Nowhere is this more ‘We have to have the same number of women on the shortlist even if three or four times as many men apply. To be one of the shortlisted men you have to be very special. To be one of the shortlisted women you do not. Every Association suspects that the members of gender-balanced shortlists are not The UN Human Rights Council last week voted overwhelmingly to condemn Israel for war crimes on the back of the Goldstone report. This was hardly a surprise, given that Goldstone – whatever his protestations since – was given a brief by the Israel-bashing UNHRC specifically premised on the advance condemnation of Israel for committing the war crimes the evidence of which his ‘fact-finding mission’ was ostensibly supposed to discover. As has been detailed in previous posts, his report was a travesty of justice, recycling as fact the unverified propaganda of Hamas and its patsies in the NGO world, ignoring the most heinous crimes of Hamas while giving a spurious air of even-handedness by condemning it just a little, and most disgustingly of all accusing...
Wednesday, 21st October 2009
The intolerable provocation of the truth at the Guardian
4:59pm
The Guardian yesterday carried an excellent piece about Israel on its Comment is Free website.
...Why this man is smiling
3:10pm
As the world wrings its hands rather than the neck of the Iranian terrorist regime (when IAEA Director Mohamed el Baradei says of the talks about a draft agreement with Tehran over its nuclear programme that he feels 'optimistic' because they were 'very constructive', it's time to run for the shelters; just look at that grin today on the face of Iran's ambassador to the IAEA, pictured above ) Israel’s former UN Ambassador Dore Gold spelled out, at a meeting in the House Commons held by the Henry Jackson Society earlier this month, just why wecannot ‘live with a nuclear Iran’:
...Tuesday, 20th October 2009
How 'human rights' have turned into inhuman wrongs
5:52pm
Is the ‘human rights’ worm finally beginning to turn?
...Why vote for the monkey when you can elect the organ-grinder?
3:13pm
If the Tories really do introduce all-women short lists for parliamentary seats, as David Cameron has today suggested to the Speaker’s Conference, it really will confirm that the Conservative party is now nothing more than Nu-Labour Lite. All-women short lists are fundamentally unjust. They institute discrimination against men. They are anti-meritocracy, reducing achievement to a rigged procedure which is a conspiracy against the best. Conservative Home features this revealing observation from one constituency about those shortlists on which half are women:
...Monday, 19th October 2009
Even perfidy is now gutless in Albion
1:08am
It appears that these days Albion doesn’t even have the courage to admit to its perfidiousness.
Wednesday, 21 October 2009
Posts
