We are ALL suffering from Climate Change and paying the price. 29.11.2009. Our Government intend signing up to a great treaty in Copenhagen on “Global Warming”, or at least that was once the title bandied about but is now changed to “Climate Change” maybe because we are in the grip of one of the coldest winters we have had for quite a while? It is all our fault that the world is in this mess because we have left our ‘Carbon Footprint’ everywhere, and we are now expected to pay for it, financially in almost everything we do. But from what I have been reading of late, I am asking is it really our fault? Is there something we have not been told? I have been reading, mainly in the European Parliament debates, about the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP) an alleged non-lethal weapon which most MEP’s seem absolutely scared to bits of. Certainly there have been debates about this project in the EU Parliament but scant mention in ours. Recorded in the debate in the EU Parliament 9.2.1998, “According to Dr Nick BEGICH, an expert from Alaska and author of one of the leading publications on the subject, the HAARP programme would allow such concentrations of energy to be attained that an entire region of the planet could be deprived of water. Electromagnetic waves can cause earthquakes or tidal waves. A Mr SPENCER pointed out that, under international conventions, any actions leading to climate change were prohibited. Mr BEGICH said that in his eyes the project was purely and simply "Star Wars technology". Moreover, it was a secret project, as the US Congress had refused to finance Star Wars. The USA, he claimed, had allocated 91 million dollars to the main programme, to which must be added the related programmes. Over the last 50 years, he said, certain levels of security had been developed which were protected from public scrutiny. State secrets were acceptable in themselves but if they involved such major repercussions for human beings and the environment they must be made public. In his view, the international community should be allowed to evaluate the risks of the HAARP programme”. I am aware of the ‘secrecy’ because I went on the Official HAARP Website and read the warning paragraph to those that dared to go on that web site. I quickly came off it. Eurico DE MELO (EPP, P) said he regarded the revelations as terrifying and said that there was a need for a campaign to inform the public about it. (I’m trying right now to do that Eurico) Mr COUPLAND expressed concern about an overlap of civil, police and military applications. He was also afraid that these weapons might be used not to replace conventional weapons but in addition to them. In Mr MAMPAEY's view, as non-lethal weapons developed, links were bound to be created between military and law-and-order operations, which, he said, would enable certain current conventions to be bypassed. There was a danger of growing militarisation of domestic police forces, which would have access to more sophisticated weaponry. This could raise problems in any state which was supposed to be based on the rule of law and to be mindful of human rights and individual freedoms. I am taking most of my comments from either the EU Parliament or the United Kingdom Parliament, in other words from the ‘official line’. However, before I go on to the EU, I would like to point you in the direction of one knowledgeable person on the subject, Michel Chossudovsky - Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa and TFF associate, author that seems very knowledgeable on the subject and I do recommend reading some of his works. He believes it is not only greenhouse gas emissions but that Washington's new world order weapons have the ability to trigger climate change. At a public hearing in Brussels on 5th February, (1998) the Committee on Foreign Affairs discussed the HAARP project (the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme), which has been developed by the US military, as well as the wider issue of non-lethal weapons. The chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Tom SPENCER (EPP, UK), stressed the importance of the hearing in connection with the report to be drawn up by Maj Britt THEORIN (PES, S) on the possible use of military resources in environmental strategies. Mr SPENCER said that he attached great importance to ensuring that varied - and indeed opposing - viewpoints were aired in the course of any hearing, so that a clear and well-informed picture of the issue could be obtained. It would therefore have been useful, on this occasion, to hear the views of the United States and NATO. However, the NATO Secretary General, after consultations within the Alliance, had told the committee that there was no NATO policy on this matter and that he was therefore unable to send an expert to the hearing. Mr SPENCER had therefore contacted the office of the US Permanent Representative to NATO but it had refused to send anyone to the hearing. Mr SPENCER regarded this as regrettable but noted that, as far as the committee was concerned, the issue would stay on the agenda. It would be ready to listen to their views at any point in the future. END From a REPORT (EU Parliament 14 Jan 1999) Legal aspects of military activities. 26.Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new 'non-lethal' weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions; 27. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the high Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being funded in Alaska; 28. Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to agree to examine the scientific and technical evidence provided in all existing research findings on HAARP to assess the exact nature and degree of risk that HAARP poses both to the local and global environment and to public health generally; 29. Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the governments of Sweden, Finland, Norway and the Russian Federation, to examine the environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings. 30. Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems; From Page 19 of the Report, it turns to HAARP- a weapons system which disrupts the climate. HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target, which should constitute a potential anti-missile system. The project would also allow better communications with submarines and manipulation of global weather patterns, but it is also possible to do the reverse, to disrupt communications. By manipulating the ionosphere one could block global communications while transmitting one's own. Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep, to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities. Over-the-horizon radar is another application, looking round the curvature of the earth for in-coming objects. From the 1950s the USA conducted explosions of nuclear material in the Van Allen Belts to investigate the effect of the electro-magnetic pulse generated by nuclear weapon explosions at these heights on radio communications and the operation of radar. This created new magnetic radiation belts which covered nearly the whole earth. The electrons travelled along magnetic lines of force and created an artificial Aurora Borealis above the North Pole. These military tests are liable to disrupt the Van Allen belt for a long period. The earth's magnetic field could be disrupted over large areas, which would obstruct radio communications. According to US scientists it could take hundreds of years for the Van Allen belt to return to normal. HAARP could result in changes in weather patterns. It could also influence whole ecosystems, especially in the sensitive Antarctic regions. Another damaging consequence of HAARP is the occurrence of holes in the ionosphere caused by the powerful radio beams. The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation. The hope is that the holes will fill again, but our experience of change in the ozone layer points in the other direction. This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us. With its far-reaching impact on the environment HAARP is a matter of global concern and we have to ask whether its advantages really outweigh the risks. The environmental impact and the ethical aspect must be closely examined before any further research and testing takes place. HAARP is a project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied. END Read above in full from website. No wonder people, including me get angry at Governments wanting ever more money because of what WE little people are doing to our climate? How dare they? When they know, without doubt all this is going on. When they fight wars using modern weapons, that leave the people using them as well as those on the receiving end, contaminated until they day they die. I have just watched an ‘Official Government Advert’ on TV pointing out that if we drive about five miles less either each day or week, we are helping to save the climate!!!! At its meeting of 20 July 1998 the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection appointed Mr Karl-Erik Olsson draftsman. It considered the draft opinion at its meetings of 12 October and 25 November 1998. The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following conclusions in its report: 11. Regards the US military ionospheric manipulation system, HAARP, based in Alaska, which is only a part of the development and deployment of electromagnetic weaponry for both external and internal security use, as an example of the most serious emerging military threat to the global environment and human health, as it seeks to interfere with the highly sensitive and energetic section of the biosphere for military purposes, while all of its consequences are not clear, and calls on the Commission, Council and the Member States to press the US Government, Russia and any other state involved in such activities to cease them, leading to a global convention against such weaponry; 12. Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems. From the UK Parliament: 17 October 2002 Defence in the World Paul Flynn (Newport, West) column 541 I have another concern that is discussed only rarely. We have heard of star wars, but other weapons are being planned and may exist. A very interesting one is HAARP-the high frequency active auroral research programme. The Americans view it as having innocent intentions, but it terrifies the Soviet Union and many other countries because its effect has been described as boiling the ionosphere. Terrible weapons might exist beyond the ones of which we are aware. It is significant that the document on the project for a new American century refers to combat likely to take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes. It says that advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool. The people who wrote that and believe that it is the future are in charge of the only superpower in the world. It is a tragedy that we have not taken a more critical stance and challenged them in the way that leaders of other European countries have done. END. Attempts have been put forward to try to make “Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons” in America and the EU whether the have succeeded or not, I do not know. See e-mail at end. Here a little more. STOP THE WEAPONIZATION OF SPACE -- (House of Representatives - May 19, 2005) (Mr. KUCINICH asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.) Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, the administration, through senior Air Force officials, wants the U.S. to achieve military supremacy in outer space. Dominating all earth from outer space will have an out-of-world price tag, perhaps more than $1 trillion. A question: Why reach for the stars with guns in our hands? Are there weapons of mass destruction on Mars? Yesterday 28 Members of Congress signed on to H.R. 2420, a bill to stop the weaponization of space, urging the President to sign an international treaty to ban such weapons. If we work together towards creating peace on earth, we would not bring war to the high heavens. Another world-renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell from Toronto (Canada), as mentioned in the EU Parliament confirms that she is one of the best-informed experts about HAARP (the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme), a programme which has been developed by the US military. She described the background to HAARP. The ionosphere is a high-altitude layer of the atmosphere with particles which are highly charged with energy. If radiation is projected into the ionosphere, huge amounts of energy can be generated and used to annihilate a given region. The HAARP project involves the manipulation of the earth's ionosphere, whose natural role is to moderate energy transfer from the sun to the earth and is used as a missile trajectory and as a reflector for radio communication. The aim of HAARP is to control and manipulate the ionosphere so as to enable the manipulator to wipe out communications at will on a global scale, or to make them resilient in the event of a nuclear war. It also enables communications to take place with submerged submarines and can, in theory, create geomagnetic pathways to guide particle beams, which could then deposit large amounts of energy anywhere on the globe. In simpler terms, HAARP, with its power of intimidation, of delivery or denial of electrical energy on a global scale and its control of communications, is an element of a system which could control the global village in some frightening ways. END I recommend Rosalie Bertell’s web-site (below) for those interested where she also writes,” In April 1986, just before the Chernobyl disaster, the US had a failed hydrogen test at the Nevada Test Site called Mighty Oaks. This test, conducted far underground, consisted of a hydrogen bomb explosion in one chamber, with a leaded steel door to the chamber, two metres thick, closing within milliseconds of the blast. The door was to allow only the first radioactive beam to escape into the "control room" in which expensive instrumentation was located. The radiation was to be captured as a weapon beam. The door failed to close as quickly as planned, causing the radioactive gases and debris to fill the control room, destroying millions of dollars worth of equipment. The experiment was part of a program to develop X-ray and particle beam weapons. The radioactive releases from Mighty Oaks were vented, under a "licensed venting", and were likely responsible for many of the North American nuclear fallout reports in May 1986, which were attributed to the Chernobyl disaster. Her Conclusions on that interesting page reads: It would be rash to assume that HAARP is an isolated experiment which would not be expanded. It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature. The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. Basic to this project is control of communications, both disruption and reliability in hostile environments. The power wielded by such control is obvious. The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver a very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be "sold" to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a devise for repairing the ozone layer. For the first time I question and ask, are we sure it is our man-made CO2 that is the problem we are having to pay for? Robbing those that allegedly have caused the problem to give our hard earned money to those countries that are not so well off, or is it just to give money to those in high places so that they can continue to fly here there and everywhere for meetings that neither serve nor save others? Have scientists been zapping the ionosphere or what I would call ‘the sky’ for 40 or 50 years? Or the earth with Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) causing more earthquakes, tsunamis. Have any of their actions caused these disasters we have seen so recently? When so many thousands have died? Will these people go on experimenting until they ‘go too far’ and destroy the world? One mad scientist that must see how far he or she can go? Test the world to extinction? President Bush saw mouths gape open all around him when he said “NO” to Kyoto. One of the most controversial ideas was of course the Trading Emission’s Scheme, where one wealthy Country buy’s unused Emission points from a poor Country all invisible except for the money that changes hands. It does however; help the poor country get richer. If WORK is given to the poor country though, they might work night and day, thus making more emissions, thus more CO2’s. Now though, it will soon be time for “Copenhagen” a long, legally binding document with our own Prime Minister that is continuing to give away money right left and centre that we really do not have to spare on a project that many people feel is a scam, a scam for the Government and any future government here in the UK to collect more much needed money. Our Prime Minister is asking for a global fund or the like to fund the alleged Climate Change. Our forces are short of equipment, our hospitals need attention, people need work here in the UK and the recession has only just begun. I hope all Governments have actually read the proposed Treaty for it is a long binding document, probably with a forward look at World Government with the UN as Government. Peter Hitchens’ has written a good article on the climate in the Mail on Sunday today (29th November 2009) and he is extolling the virtues about Christopher Booker’s new book “The Real Global Warming Disaster”, which I look forward to reading as it is on my Christmas list. From Peter Hitchins words, and from what I have been reading about all the recent disasters re the weather, I do wonder if there is any connection with HAARP or ELF? Certainly others have asked the question before me and I too, as I read the ‘timings’ and ‘coincidences’ it certainly does seem possible. There is much more on this subject, many ‘theories’ which I have tried to avoid here, but I must admit, it is a vast subject and I have collected a great deal of ‘data’. It is up to you whether you look deeper and follow the leads from the web-sites below, it may open up a whole new world for you. Read all about it---while it lasts. Anne Palmer. 1998 EU Parliament http://www.europarl.eu.int/dg3/sdp/newsrp/en/1998/n980205.htm#3. EU parliament REPORT 14.1.1999 PE 227.710/fin. A4-0005/99 Dr. Rosalie Bertell http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/HAARPbg.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalie_Bertell Chemtrails Did HAARP cause a black out in 2003? http://www.bariumblues.com/haarpblack2.htm HAARP and ELF http://www.bariumblues.com/bertell_reveals_many_new_weapons.htm http://www.policestateplanning.com/european_parliament.htm Paul Flinn’s comment on Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons http://www.lulu.com/items/volume_56/849000/849498/1/print/849498.pdf May 19th 2005 Mr. KUCINICH http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2005_record&page=H3586&position=allBefore I go on any further, I would like to recall that when the atomic bomb came out, or with any new bomb or weapon, they have to be tested, and I remember the tests shown on film at the time when the first atomic bomb was tested. How people were put at risk because the inventor only thought he knew the extent of the danger his invention might cause. Many of those that took part in that experiment suffered long term problems. Recently we have seen problems too of the latest inventions, Cern-the Large Hadron Collider when the first trial did not go according to plan. It seems to me, ‘they’, whoever ‘they’ are, do not seem to understand WHAT they are doing; just as long as they “experiment” they really could not care less who or what they are putting into danger.
[Relevant document: The Fifth Report from the Defence Committee, Session 2001-02, HC914, on the Future of NATO.]
Monday, 30 November 2009
Posts
