Op-EdDr. Tawfik Hamid's "...Just A View" Thanks N.Z. FROM HH
Apologetic Attitudes towards Radical Islam Aggravate ItABC's Test for Radical Islam Op-Eds by Dr. Hamid
by Tawfik Hamid
www.TawfikHamid.com
Ignoring a problem or trying to find justification for the problem instead of confronting it can only make things worse. For example, if someone disregarded the start of a fire in his house, or a doctor ignored the beginning signs of cancer in the body, the outcome would be disastrous.
Overwhelming evidence supports the view that a radical and lethal form of Islam has been growing in the Muslim world since the late seventies. The Iranian Islamic revolution, the application of inhumane Sharia rules in several parts of the Muslim world, and the growing threat of Islamic terrorism are concrete evidence of the rising of a major threat to the world's security and harmony.
Failure to recognize and confront this threat (or Islamism) at its early stages has resulted in several devastating consequences such as Sep 11 and the many other atrocities conducted by radical Muslims all over the world.
Some apologists thought that ignoring the ideological component of the problem of Islamic Radicalism, would appease the Muslim world and prevent a possible clash of civilizations. However, by adopting such a defenseless attitude the apologists actually made things worse and increased the possibility for such a clash of civilizations to happen.
The impact of ignoring the role of ideology in creating Islamic Radicalism has resulted in the following three outcomes:
1- The apologetic attitude towards Radical Islam has impeded reformation efforts within the Muslim world. Ignoring the role Ideology played in creating the problem has made reformation within Islam simply unnecessary. The Muslim world is unlikely to consider changing violent interpretations of the religious text as long as western apologists insist ideology played no role in creating the problem. In other words, by ignoring the truth there is no incentive for Muslims to make any changes in the traditional interpretations of their religion. Criticisms of the violent interpretations of Islam are needed to encourage the Muslim world to make a change in such interpretations and to adopt more moderate understanding of the religion.
2- The apologetic attitudes toward Islamic radicalism encouraged Jihadists and terrorists to attack more because they recognized that whatever they do Western apologists will find justifications. The same applies to those who practice stoning of women as part of Sharia Law and the Western apologists who claim that Sharia Law is compatible with human rights! To make it clearer, why should someone change his violent behavior if everyone is telling him that it is 'peaceful'?
3- The apologetic attitudes towards Radical Islam have made many policy makers in the West unable to make appropriate decisions to deal with it. Postulating Non ideological reasons for the problem and ignoring the obvious ideological factors have mislead many leaders and directed their efforts to the wrong cause(s) of the problem.
The integration of the above outcomes of the apologetic attitudes to Radical Islam has given more fuel to the fire of Islamic Radicalism and actually made things worse. If the apologists for radical Islam were honest enough to admit the role of the Ideology, appropriate steps and measures to prevent violent atrocities could have been taken years ago. Ignoring the true cause of the problem has only made things worse.
The rising number of people who have a negative perception of Islam and the recent vote in Switzerland to ban the Minarets is clear evidence of the failure of the apologetic attitudes to improve the image of Islam. Addressing the problem of Radical Islam in an honest & scientific manner and dealing with it with wisdom was and is still the best way to go. 
The time has come to define Radical Islam. Please ask your local mosque, Islamic Shool, and Islamic organization to clearly, unambiguously and publically denounce the following concepts:
Apostates killing
Beating women and stoning them to death for adultery.
Calling Jews pigs and monkeys.
Declaring war on Non Muslims to spread Islam after offering Non Muslims three options - subjugate to Islam, pay Jizia (a humiliating tax), or be killed.
Enslavement of Other Human Beings.
Fighting and killing Jews before the "End of Days".
Gay Discrimination and Hostility.Op-Eds by Dr. Hamid An op-ed, is a newspaper article that expresses the opinions of a named writer who is usually unaffiliated with the newspaper's editorial board. For links to some of Dr. Hamid articles, please click on the article name to be forwarded to the external page:
Tuesday, 8 December 2009
Apologetic Attitudes towards Radical Islam Aggravate It
A true moderate person or organization must be able to immediately denounce the above concepts and stand publicly and unambiguously against them.
The Muslim world can not expect the world to consider Islam peaceful as long as they teach and promote such tenets.
A clear stand is needed from leading Islamic Scholars all over the world against such teachings.
2. New York Daily News:
Posts
