Pearl Harbor Day erased! Happy Islamic New Year
Explosive outrage as Dec. 7 remembers Muslims instead of Japan attack on U.S.
Posted: January 06, 2010
8:04 pm Eastern
By Joe Kovacs
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
POMPANO BEACH, Fla. – Explosive outrage is being unleashed on a popular supermarket chain after it published a 2010 calendar marking the date of Dec. 7 with the Islamic New Year, while eliminating any mention of Pearl Harbor Day, commemorating the 1941 attack on the U.S. by Japan.
Joyce Kaufman, a talk-show host on WFTL Radio in South Florida, made the "date which will live in infamy" the centerpiece of her broadcast today, expressing outrage at Publix Supermarkets for its calendar omission.
 Florida talk-show host Joyce Kaufman of WFTL Radio |
"We have guys that are fighting Islamic fundamentalists right now in Afghanistan and guarding them from ruining what little freedom they have achieved in Iraq," said Kaufman. "And now I gotta celebrate their new year over here in my country when they're getting on airplanes and trying to blow up planes out of the sky in Detroit? I gotta have their New Year's Day on my calendar and not Pearl Harbor Day? We've lost our minds!"
Kaufman and many callers to her station called it a "slap in the face" to all those who fought for America's freedoms over the years.
"I'm done," she said. "I'm not walking into a Publix until there's a formal apology. I'm not walking into a Publix until the calendars have all been pulled. I'm not walking into a Publix until they reissue a calendar and re-evaluate what they put on their calendars. It's a free country, but I don't have to shop there."
Some enraged listeners called in to suggest consumers shred the calendars and mail them to the supermarket's corporate headquarters in Lakeland, Fla.WND:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=121181
The rest of the English churches follow Rowen Williams appalling example of not only capitulation but attempting (why why why ???) to make islam look like a bona fide religion. Outrageous!
Well done Dr Clifford I applaud you and only wish the media would listen more to you. Perhaps a visit to Radio 4's Today program is called for!!!! May God grant you the strength to continue in this valiant fight. And thanks to Andy Edwards for highlighting this article, clearly WND do an immense service, on a daily basis, in drawing readers' attention to this sort of nonsense in the West.
Sincerely
Nick Chance
http://WeAreAngry.co.uk
MUHAMMAD - MAD, IMMORAL MONSTER
The following text is Appendix 5 from Dr Alan C. Clifford’s publication, Christianity, Islam & British Politics (Charenton Reformed Publishing, Norwich, 2006), pp. 59-60.
CHRIST AND MUHAMMAD COMPARED
Some otherwise useful Christian books on Muslim outreach discourage the idea of criticising Muhammad. However, when Christ warned against ‘false prophets’, He provided criteria by which to identify them (see Matthew 7: 15-20). Accordingly, it is quite extraordinary that anyone should ever place Jesus and Muhammad in the same kind of category. Writers and educators are guilty of gross deception in failing to distinguish the two ‘leaders’. Dr Philip Schaff provides an accurate brief assessment of Muhammad in a portrait that is hardly flattering:
He was a better man in the period of his adversity and persecution at Mecca, than during his prosperity and triumph at Medina. History records many examples of characters rising from poverty and obscurity to greatness, and then decaying under the sunshine of wealth and power. He degenerated, like Solomon, but did not repent, like the preacher of ‘vanity of vanities’. He had a melancholic and nervous temperament, liable to fantastic hallucinations and alternations of high excitement and deep depression, bordering at times on despair and suicide. ... Towards his enemies he was cruel and revengeful.
Sir William Muir concedes his original honesty and zeal as a reformer and warner, but assumes a gradual deterioration to the judicial blindness of a self-deceived heart, and even a kind of Satanic inspiration in the later revelations. ... He did not shrink from perfidy. He believed in the use of the sword as the best missionary, and was utterly unscrupulous as to the means of success. He could take pleasure in cruel and perfidious assassination, could gloat over the massacre of entire tribes, and savagely consign the innocent babe to the fires of hell. Muhammad was a slave of sensual passion. Aisha [his favourite wife], who knew him best in his private character and habits, used to say: “The prophet loved three things, women, perfumes and food; he had his heart’s desire of the first two, but not of the last.”
The motives of his excess in polygamy were his sensuality which grew with his years, and his desire for male offspring. His followers excused or justified him [because of] the difficulties of his prophetic office, which were so great that God gave him a compensation in sexual enjoyment, and endowed him with greater capacity than thirty ordinary men. ... He had at least fourteen legal wives, and a number of slave concubines besides. At his death he left nine widows. He claimed special revelations which gave him greater liberty of sexual indulgence than ordinary Muslims (who are restricted to four wives), and exempted him from the prohibition of marrying near relatives. ... He married [Aisha] when she was a girl of nine years [which makes him a paedophile in modern terms]. To compare such a man with Jesus is preposterous and even blasphemous. Jesus was the sinless Saviour of sinners; Mohammed was a sinner, and he knew and confessed it. He falls far below Moses or Elijah, or any of the prophets in moral purity (see History of the Christian Church (1883), iv. 143-203).
Posts
