Saturday, 13 March 2010


Linklaters opinion letter 

at centre of


Lehman funding controversy


Author: Jeremy

Hodges


www.legalweek.com

12 Mar 2010 | 13:37

right

Linklaters has been embroiled in a fresh controversy over the collapse of Lehman Brothers after a new report revealed that the bank relied on an opinion letter from the firm for a transaction that flattered its financial strength.

A report published on Thursday (11 March) by US law firm Jenner & Block on the Chapter 11 proceedings of Lehman Brothers accuses the bank of using aggressive accounting practices to mask the true state of its finances ahead of its collapse in 2008.

The 2,200-page report found Lehman used a Repo 105 transaction, whereby the bank sold and then repurchased financial assets, as part of "bank sheet manipulation" to artificially lower its leverage.

The report by Jenner chairman Anton Valukas, the court-appointed examiner to Lehman's US bankruptcy proceedings, states that the bank was unable to get an opinion letter from a US law firm to classify the transaction as a "true sale", which was required to enjoy "balance sheet and leverage relief" from the deal.

The report states that US law does not allow such transactions to be classified as sales, rather than short-term funding arrangements.

However, Linklaters then provided a true sale opinion letter for a UK law transactions through Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (LBIE), the bank's European business, which is allowed in the UK.

Varlukas states in the report: "Unable to find a US law firm that would provide it with an opinion letter permitting the true sale accounting treatment under US law, Lehman conducted its Repo 105 program under the aegis of an opinion letter Linklaters wrote for LBIE, Lehman's European broker‐dealer in London, under English law."

Varlukas continues "Although the Linklaters letter was written for the exclusive benefit of LBIE, a significant volume of Lehman's Repo 105 transactions was executed for the benefit and using the securities of one or more US-based Lehman entities".

There is no suggestion that Linklaters has acted unethically or in conflict with UK law.

In a statement, Linklaters said: "The US examiner's report into the failure of Lehman includes references to English law opinions which Linklaters gave in relation to a number of Lehman transactions. The examiner - who did not contact the firm during his investigations - does not criticise those opinions or say or suggest that they were wrong or improper. We have reviewed the opinions and are not aware of any facts or circumstances which would justify any criticism."

However, the tactics of Lehman's management in using the transactions to flatter its financial position at a time when the bank was under acute pressure in the run-up to its collapse are strongly criticised in the report. The report also criticises Lehman's auditor, Ernst & Young, for failing to challenge the use of the Repo transactions.

Click here to access report in full.

For more, see Lehman Report Full of Goodies from The Am Law Daily.


British law firm 'conspired' to hide $50bn debts of Wall St giant


By LUCY FARNDON


Last updated at 3:20 PM on 13th March 2010


A top British law firm helped stricken banking giant Lehman Brothers hide its debts in the run-up to the bank's collapse, a report said yesterday.

Linklaters, one of the City's 'magic circle' law practices, signed off questionable accounting techniques to disguise $50billion (£36billion) debts.

The 2,200-page report, published yesterday in America, found that Linklaters allowed 'balance sheet manipulation' while investors remained in the dark as to what was going on.

Lehman

Accused: Protestors hold signs behind Richard Fuld, former chairman of Lehman Brothers, as he takes his seat to testify at a Congressional hearing in 2008

Crucially, Lehman had turned to the UK after it failed to find an American law firm who would sign off the activities, the report said.

Linklaters advised Lehman that the accounting practice was allowed under English law.

'REPO 105': ACCOUNTING GIMMICK THAT MADE THE BANK LOOK HEALTHY

Lehman was dependent on raising hundreds of billions of dollars of short-term finance every day just to survive.

This cash was raised on so-called 'repo' markets where assets can be swapped for short-term loans.

Because money raised in this way has to be repaid within days, the assets are not deemed to have left the banks' balance sheets.

However, under the terms of 'repo 105' Lehman could report a reduction in assets if it exchanged those assets for funds at a conversion rate of 105 to 100.

Put simply, assets with a value of $105 would be swapped for loans at a value of $100, meaning that $105 of assets could be removed from the balance sheet when reporting group financial results.

The report was produced by U.S lawyer Anton Valukas, who was appointed by a judge to investigate the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008.

It was the largest bankruptcy in American history and triggered a panic which brought the global economy to its knees. The domino effect resulted in the state bail-out of UK banks RBS and HBOS.

The disclosure that one of the country's largest and respected law firms was involved in controversial accounting practices will be an embarrassment to the City.

Mr Valukas found that Lehman had been insolvent for weeks before it filed for bankruptcy.

Executives had used a complicated transaction that enabled them to remove liabilities from Lehman's balance sheet for a short time, when results were due, and hide the true level of its debts. It was approved by Linklaters and signed off by the bank's auditors Ernst & Young.

The report found that Lehman used this transaction 'to create a materially misleading picture of the firm's financial condition in late 2007 and 2008'.

The Valukas report said: 'Unable to find a United States law firm that would provide it with an opinion letter permitting the true sale accounting treatment under United States law, Lehman conducted its... programme under the aegis of an opinion letter the Linklaters law firm in London wrote... under English law.'

There is no suggestion that Linklaters did anything illegal under English law. The firm said last night: 'The U.S. Examiner's report into the failure of Lehman Brothers includes references to English Law opinions which Linklaters gave in relation to a number of Lehman transactions.

'The Examiner - who did not contact the firm during his investigations - does not criticise those opinions or say or suggest that they were wrong or improper. We have reviewed the opinions and are not aware of any facts or circumstances which would justify any criticism.' 

Mr Valukas found no evidence of extensive wrongdoing at Lehman, but said there were grounds for negligence and breach of duty actions against chief executive Dick Fuld and some colleagues.

He also found that Barclays, which bought a large chunk of Lehman's U.S. business after it filed for bankruptcy, received some assets it was not entitled to, including office equipment, but they were worth less than £6.6million.

Lehman Brothers in the Canary Wharf district

End of an era: A worker leaves the offices Lehman Brothers in the Canary Wharf, London after the bank was made bankrupt in September 2008. Thousands of workers lost their jobs