[Note: Regarding the political Left’s attempted deification of President Obama, on December 28, 2009 the Danish newspaper Politiken published an editorial “Obama Greater Than Jesus” proclaiming Obama “the practical savior of our times.” And here in the U.S., associate editor of Smith College’s The Sophian, Maggie Mertens, on September 18, 2008 wrote “‘I Will Follow Him’: Obama as My Personal Jesus,” in which she proclaimed: “Yes, I just said it. Obama is my Jesus…. I’ve officially been saved, and soon, whether they like it or not, the rest of the country will be too…. In the name of Obama, amen.” Concerning another matter, on April 28, 1997 Secretary of Defense William Cohen revealed that there are those who are “engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.” About what specific terrorists was he talking, and how could they use electromagnetic waves to set off earthquakes?] In part 8 of this series, I mentioned the connection between Nelson Rockefeller and the Nazis. In March 1942, the U.S. Attorney-General’s office revealed that next to the Rockefeller’s stock in Jersey Standard Oil Company, the second largest shareholder was the Nazi-controlled I.G. Farben. Building on this, Nazi Party head, Martin Bormann working with Himmler’s SS and others, initiated Aktion Adlerflug or Operation Eagle Flight using stocks, bonds, gold, etc. to create or control corporations in Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and Argentina. According to Paul Manning (a CBS journalist during WWII) in Martin Bormann: Nazi in Exile, Bormann “utilized every known device to disguise their [750 corporations] ownership and their patterns of operation: use of nominees, option agreements, pool agreements, endorsements in blank, escrow deposits, pledges, collateral loans, rights of first refusal, management contracts, service contracts, patent agreements, cartels, and withholding procedures.” But who would manage all these corporations over the long term? According to Curt Riess in The Nazis Go Underground(Spring 1944, before D-Day), the Heimschulen (home schools) in the Spring of 1943 had their curriculum changed slightly so that “instead of developing spies and saboteurs, these schools were put to the task of developing workers for the underground.” Riess also explained that many SS members were “sheep dipped,” seemingly resigning from and disavowing the Nazi Party. Riess continued: “What has not yet become known is that all this applies to a much greater number of anonymous persons all over Germany, those on the second and third levels of the Nazi strata…. Party functionaries who may be known locally, but certainly not nationally, can easily be transferred to another city or town, where they will suddenly appear as anti-Nazis. The Party helps in their masquerades. These men get new documents which ‘prove’ that they have always been anti-Nazi. Notes are inserted in their personal files saying they must be watched on account of their anti-Hitler attitudes and ‘unworthy’ behavior. Some of them will undoubtedly be sent to concentration camps for crimes which they have never committed, but which will make them look dependable in the eyes of the Allies; some have perhaps already succeeded in joining anti-Nazi circles and are pretending to conspire against Hitler. Later on they will be able to use such activities as alibis.” In addition to Himmler and Bormann directing the secret Nazi plan, there were others of importance. Konstantin Hierl of the Ministry of Economics in July 1943 delivered a speech in Munich to key members of the Reich Labor Service stating that “we must decentralize to such a degree that we must seem to have disappeared.” Riess explained: “There will be no connections between the different cells, no go-betweens, for many years after the party has submerged…. The members of the cells will not know anything about the members of any other cells, not even that any other cells exist. Only a few leaders who will not be in Germany will have complete knowledge of how many men (200,000- 300,000) are available and where they are… hidden away within German plants, factories, city administrations, etc.” According to Riess, since May 16, 1943, the individuals primarily responsible for selecting members of the cells were SS Gen. Fritz Kaltenbrunner and SS Gen. Werner Heissmeyer. Another institution of political education besides the Heimschulen were the Ordensburgen. In the Swedish newspaper Aftontidningen (October 13, 1943), one reads that these schools instructed their students how to act “if extremely great distress should afflict the country.” Riess indicated that the Nazi Ordensburgen prepared agents to go underground who would “be physically fit young men… who speak a number of foreign languages fluently and, if possible, at least one without any trace of accent. They are also taught… how to behave in a number of countries in such a way as not to be immediately recognized as having been ‘made in Germany’.” Riess also revealed that the German branch of the Red Cross “can provide an ideal front for the Nazi underground,” and that “undoubtedly Himmler has already taken measures to plant some of his best men in the Criminal Police and the regular uniformed police.” In his conclusion, Riess warned in 1944 that “if we don’t stamp out the Nazi underground, it will make itself felt all over the world; in this country too.” A primary destination for the Nazi underground was Argentina, and one would think denying the Nazis communications with their contacts there would be important. However, according to Glen Yeadon and John Hawkins in The Nazi Hydra in America, President Truman’s chief science advisor, RCA chief David Sarnoff, at the end of WWII approved of RCA (through its subsidiary Transradio) maintaining “a radio link between Buenos Aires and Berlin for the Nazis.” The next year (1946), Richard Nixon ran for Congress, and his law firm Bewley, Kroop, and Nixon received a $2 million fee from Romanian Nazi Nicolae Malaxa which helped Nixon get elected. Malaxa had been a business partner of Hermann Goering (head of the Nazi air force) and worked for the Gestapo before setting up a company in Nixon’s hometown of Whittier, California, according to John Loftus and Mark Aarons in The Secret War Against the Jews (1994). Allen Dulles and Nixon worked together, and in 1947 when the OSS was being transformed into the CIA, Henry Kissinger was Dulles’ translator and later President Nixon’s Secretary of State. The next year (1948) in August, President Harry Truman adopted National Security Council (NSC) document number 20, which included Operation Bloodstone. This Operation lasted from 1948 to 1950 and brought Nazi collaborators to the U.S. “as intelligence and covert operations experts,” according to Christopher Simpson inBlowback: America’s Recruitment of Nazis and its Disastrous Effect on Our Domestic and Foreign Policy (1988). Simpson continued: “Some of them eventually became U.S. agent spotters for sabotage and assassination missions. The men and women enlisted under Bloodstone were not low-level thugs, concentration camp guards, or brutal hoodlums, at least not in the usual sense of those words. Quite the contrary, they were the cream of the Nazis and collaborators, the leaders, the intelligence specialists, and the scholars who had put their skills to work for the Nazi cause.” Regarding the CIA’s work with Nazis, John Loftus in “The Muslim Brotherhood, Nazis and Al Qaeda” (Jewish Community News, October 4, 2004) revealed that many of the Nazis he had been assigned to prosecute when working for the U.S. Attorney-General were on the CIA payroll. He found this information literally buried in U.S. government vaults underground in Suitland, Maryland. In those vaults, Loftus also found the CIA has volumes of files on the Muslim Brotherhood, “a fascist organization that was hired by Western intelligence that evolved over time into what we today know as al-Qaeda.” In the 1930s, “the Muslim Brotherhood became a secret arm of Nazi intelligence,” according to Loftus, who seems somewhat surprised that “at the end of WWII… instead of prosecuting the Nazis—the Muslim Brotherhood—the British government hired them. They brought all the fugitive Nazi war criminals of Arab and Muslim descent into Egypt, and for three years they were trained on a special mission. The British Secret Service wanted to use the fascists of the Muslim Brotherhood to strike down the infant state of Israel in 1948…. What the British did then, they sold the Arab Nazis to the predecessor of what became the CIA.” Loftus wouldn’t have been surprised at this if he knew the connections between the British and Jamal Eddine al-Afghani going back to the 1870s; if he knew Afghani’s influence on Mohammed Abduh whose ideas influenced Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in 1928; if he knew that Lord Alfred Milner (who executed Cecil Rhodes’ secret plan “to take the government of the whole world”) told the British House of Lords in 1923 that there must never be a Jewish nation in the Middle East; and if he knew that Herbert Samuel, who was a member of the Milner Group that controlled British foreign affairs for most of the 20th century prior to WWII, in 1921 appointed Hajj (Muhammed Effendi) Amin al-Husseini as Mufti and head political administrator of Arab Palestine even though he had killed many Jews (al-Husseini would become a Nazi ally). Loftus explained that “during the 1950s, the CIA evacuated the Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood to Saudi Arabia [where] some of the leading lights of the Muslim Brotherhood like [Abdullah Yusuf] Azzam became the teachers in the Madrasses, the religious schools. And there they combined the doctrines of Nazism with this weird Islamic cult, Wahabbiism…. [In these schools] there was a young student who paid attention—and Azzam’s student was named Osama bin Laden…. In 1979, the CIA decided to take the Arab Nazis out of cold storage,... [and] told the Saudis that we would fund them if they would bring all of the Arab Nazis together and ship them off to Afghanistan to fight the Russians…. We called them the Maktab al Khidimat il Mujahideen, the MAK.” Loftus again seemed surprised that after “Azzam and his assistant, Osama bin Laden,” won the war against the Russians in 1989, the CIA “left this army of Arab fascists in the field of Afghanistan.” Perhaps he wouldn’t have been surprised if he read The Grand Chessboard (1997) by Zbigniew Brzezinski, who lured the Soviets into Afghanistan in 1979; if he realized that al-Afghani (mentioned earlier) was an Iranian; and if he understood that the CIA relied on the Gehlen Organization’s Nazis in Iran (which is the primary threat to Israel today) to overthrow Iran’s elected government in 1953. Loftus correctly notes that another threat to Israel is Hamas, which “is actually the secret chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood.” As I’ve indicated before, the PE’s plans involved coercing Israel into joining the recently formed Mediterranean Union which could then be linked economically to the European Union (EU). In order to do that, Yugoslavia’s Slobodan Milosovic was standing in the way and therefore had to be removed. Toward that end, CIA and Arab Nazis would once again join forces. The heart of the Nazi movement was, of course, in Germany, which plays a critical role in the success of the EU. PE agent and Rhodes scholar Bill Clinton became President in January 1993, and on January 13, Sen. Joe Biden (now President Obama’s Vice-President), asked Secretary of State of State nominee Warren Christopher how the new administration would “foster the creation of a new world order… converting NATO into a military instrument for peacekeeping under UN or CSCE auspices.” NATO would be headed militarily by Rhodes scholar Gen. Wesley Clark, and on April 3, 1995 the Clinton Administration appointed Retired Maj. Gen. John Sewall (Rhodes scholar) as a special military advisor to help integrate the armed forces of the Bosnian Muslims and Croats. The various factions in Yugoslavia met in Dayton, Ohio and the Bosnian Peace Accords were signed November 1995 with Croatian leader Franjo Tudjman saying he believed the agreements would “result in lasting peace and create conditions necessary for the establishment of a new international order in this part of the world.” Explaining what happened, U.S. Rep. Randy Cunningham on December 6, 1995 revealed: “Germany sees its economic future in the hands of the Balkans.” This was why EU leaders on June 27, 1995 had sent mediator Carl Bildt to Serbia (Yugoslavia) to demand the opening of a land corridor to the Adriatic (which leads to the Ionian Sea then to the Mediterranean). But Yugoslav leader Milosovic was still a problem, so the PE had to devise a means to remove him. The Arab Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Al Qaeda (Osama bin Laden) allied with Albanian Muslims to support the Muslim Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). According to former Canadian Ambassador to Yugoslavia James Bissett in “We Created a Monster” (Toronto Globe and Mail, July 31, 2001), long before the NATO bombing of Serbia (Yugoslavia) which began March 24, 1999 supposedly because of “ethnic cleansing” in Kosovo, “We now know that NATO countries were inciting violence in Kosovo and attempting to destabilize that Serbian province…. Media reports have revealed that as early as 1998, the Central Intelligence Agency, assisted by the British Special Armed Services, were arming and training Kosovo Liberation Army members in Albania to foment armed rebellion in Kosovo. The KLA terrorists were sent back into Kosovo to assassinate Serbian mayors, ambush Serbian policemen, and do everything possible to incite murder and chaos…. After bombing Yugoslavia into submission, NATO then stood by and submissively allowed the KLA to murder, pillage and burn….” On June 3, 1999 Milosovic accepted NATO’s demands to stop the bombing. This was after he was indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia on May 24 for war crimes. On April 21, 2001 he was arrested and then extradited to The Hague in June. In February 2002 his trial started, and in January 2003 he pled not guilty. While the trial was still going on, he was found mysteriously dead in his cell in March 2006. Milosovic was no longer an obstacle to the PE’s plans to connect the EU to the future Mediterranean Union (MU) to be established formally January 27, 2010 (seehttp://europenews.dk/en/node/28957). In anticipation of the MU’s formal establishment, on January 21, 2010 the first meeting of the Euro-Mediterranean Regional & Local Assembly (ARLEM) was called by PE agent Javier Solana, who had been simply a physics instructor in Virginia, but later made political head of NATO by Rhodes scholars Bill Clinton, Strobe Talbot and Richard Gardner. Click here for part -----> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, © 2010 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education. Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch. E-Mail: Not Available =============== By Henrik R Clausen 13 - 25 January 2010 The news is tucked away in this discreet ANSAmed news item: MED UNION: JORDANIAN MASADEH APPOINTED AS SECRETARY Quote: It is remarkable that an ambassador of a non-democratic nation has been appointed to head the Union. Now, it should not be assumed that the European Union, run by a non-elected Commission and having a non-elected President, should care too much about such details. But since the 16 non-EU states of the Mediterranean Union does include decent democracies (Israel, Croatia) as well as more dubious ones (Albania, Bosnia, Turkey), it would seem appropriate to appoint a representative from a democratic country to head the Union. There are more remarkable passages in that piece. Quote: There we have it – full stealth mode. Unless someone protests loudly, this will proceed. Now, in order to field a reasonable protest, one needs to know what goes on, and politicians in democracies need to know if they have public support for the protest or not. Since neither of these are the case, no protests can be expected, and the project will continue. Further, 'making history' through 'tacit consent' is not an honorable way to run things in a democracy. Either you have democracy, Rule by the People, where all major decisions are based on public, not tacit, consent. Alternatively, you should give up the pretense of democracy and declare EU to be the Oligarchy it truly is. That would at least be honest. Sounds sweet, doesn't it? But it also suffers from the kind of abstraction where you can tuck in just about anything. To figure out what goes on and what the perspectives are, one should perhaps consult the EuroMed University in Slovenia. One could also ask the Anna Lindh Foundation or study their Strategy Paper to find out. Or solicit the opinion of the Alliance of Civilizations. The AoC home page currently features a photo of the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, recent recipient of the ”King Faisal International Prize”, explicitly given for ”his services to Islam”. Report at JihadWatch. The participation of persons and governments like these, who also openly maintain warm relations to the brutal Iranian regime, is in itself sufficient reason to suspend EuroMed indefinitely. All of this, apart from the King Faisal International Prize, is paid for by our tax money, yet far removed from public scrutiny and debate. We should not accept our leaders to engage in a project like this, developed behind closed doors, with lofty and unclear perspectives. A project left naïvely open to exploitation by non-democratic member states and religious fanatics alike. What is the difference between EuroMed and the Union for the Mediterranean? Quote from the European Commission: In other words, nothing of significance. The change of name is said to increase visibility, but in reality this is mere window dressing to confuse the press and the public. You don't magically get more visibility merely by uttering the word. For real visibility, critical inquery and public debate is needed. There was an implicit assumption that when French President Sarkozy launched his Union for the Mediterranean, Sarkozy's proposal for Mediterranean bloc makes waves it was a different initiative, that the concerns about the original EuroMed had been taken seriously, causing it to be replaced by a less ambitious and less dangerous 'Club Med'. This is documentably false. The confusion, however, worked quite well. It became unclear to journalists and citizens alike what was the nature of Sarkozy's project, what kind of progress would take place, and if this made sense at all. The last significant press reports assume that the project was now faltering Sarkozy's Union of the Mediterranean falters, thus nothing to worry about. In reality his "Club Med" has served to cover the fact that EuroMed proceeds apace. Thus, we have been subject to several acts of deception. This is not in itself illegal or punishable under the law, it is merely disrespect for the spirit of democracy. We should not be all too surprised, for Sarkozy performed a similar sleight of hand for the Constitutional Treaty, now renamed the Lisbon Treaty, after it had been rejected in French and Dutch referendums. Sarkozy had originally promised the electorate that the Constitutional Treaty would be replaced by a 'Mini-treaty', a concept that lead journalists and citizens alike to assume that the concerns that led to the rejection by the people had been addressed. The new Treaty, however, turned out to be wordier than the rejected one. Sarkozy kept his promise with a simple trick: Setting the revised version with a smaller type, that it could be printed on fewer pages. Such behaviour from our most trusted politicians leave us lost for words, damaging democracy itself by means of contempt from our very own leaders. More on that (a very interesting subject unto itself) in From Constitution to Lisbon. This practice of deception alone is sufficient reason for the citizens of Europe to reject EuroMed, now renamed Union for the Mediterranean. It is a project not subjected to public scrutiny, conceived before it was understood that Islamism is a threat to the free world, and based on blind and naïve assumptions on the goodwill of all involved parties. This is unworkable and dangerous in the current political situation. Much more needs to be researched and discussed about EuroMed, its implications for Europe, for immigration and the development of Eurabia. The latter was for a long time considered almost a conspiracist theory created by historian Bat Ye'or. Yet, if one connects the dots and follows the news, its implementation is well underway, formally as well as informally. She was right from the very first day. UPDATE - Bat Ye'or comments: They should not allow a small group of people to conduct their affairs behind their back, as it has been for the whole immigration and Mediterranean policy since 1973 as European, Arab, and American sources confirm it. The media should be open to debates and should not be controlled by networks subjected to the Organization of the Islamic Conference fatwas. This is going on now. More and more international policy is conducted through international networks linked to the UN bodies weakening democratic institutions.
Monday, 8 March 2010
Here comes EuroMed: 14 days left to protest!
Ahmad Khalaf Masadeh, Jordanian ambassador to Brussels, has today been appointed as secretary general of the Mediterranean Union.
A statement will be circulated tomorrow amongst the 42 Foreign ministers of the countries which make up the Mediterranean Union, with any comments to be made within 15 days. With the exception of surprise opposition, today's appointment will be definitively approved by a process of tacit consent. "Today we have made history."
While maintaining the acquis of its predecessor, the Barcelona Process offers more balanced governance, increased visibility to its citizens and a commitment to tangible, regional and trans-national projects.
THE POWER ELITE AND THE SECRET NAZI PLAN
PART 10
By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
March 8, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Posts
