They've been on a rampage - by Richard... Monday, March 22, 2010

They've been on a rampage - by Richard... Monday, March 22, 2010

There's no getting away from the fact that those who are deniers of climate change have been lying in wait, having been organising themselves, and the moment this opportunity arose they've decided to strike and since then they've been on a rampage.

See the rest here.

COMMENT THREAD - CLIMATE CHANGE

Print ready

A condition of membership - by Richard...

Although adored by the claque and many others besides, we have always taken the view of Boris Johnson that, behind the amiable front of a jovial buffoon, there is ... a jovial buffoon – although hold the "jovial". The man is an unrepentant idiot.

No more so does this show than today when this over-paid columnist holds forth in an op-ed in The Daily Telegraph, railing against the influx of some 62,000 students from other EU countries into British universities, displacing indigenous candidates who would otherwise have found places.

The dismal Boris thus asks why we should pay to educate French and Latvian students, noting that these students take advantage of our system – a traffic that is almost entirely one-way.

Had he enough brain cells for there to be a chance collision, producing the semblance of intelligence, our Boris would know several things. Firstly, British universities are uniquely popular with our European brethren for one very good reason – they teach in English, the lingua franca of the educated classes, much to the disgust of the French.

Secondly, when it comes to accepting these students, and the charging system which means that the fees are essentially unrecoverable, under EU law we have no choice but to continue with it. Under the freedom of movement and non-discrimination provisions of the basic treaty – the Treaty of Rome – the UK must apply exactly the same deal that it gives UK students. 

Furthermore, applicants from EU member states must be treated in exactly the same way as UK citizens. Universities are not allowed, again under EU law, to discriminate on the grounds of nationality, giving preference to British domiciled applicants.

The point here is that this is not new – it came with the basic treaty that we signed up to in 1972, under a Conservative government, but has come to a head only relatively recently as the word has got out that we are a soft touch. The only way we could avoid the problem is to charge fees up-front, which would cause havoc with our own students.

Thus, we are stuck with the system – for as long as we are members of the EU. It is inherent in our membership, part of the treaty, and cannot be changed by the UK. And since Boris the Buffoon is a member of a political party that wants to remain in the EU, there is actually no prospect of any change. 

None of that, however, will stop the idiot writing fatuous op-ed pieces, printed by a newspaper that should know better, for want of a simple explanation of the facts of life that apply as a condition of our membership of the evil empire.

COMMENT THREAD

Print ready

Distorted priorities - by Richard...

It says something of the narrow-minded obsessiveness of the WWF that, despite the state of emergency in Mongolia, itsonly interest in the country seems to be that its fatuous Earth hour will stretch from "Mongolia to Argentina ... ".

In their freezing hellhole, there would probably be many hundreds of thousands of Mongolians who would be extremely happy to turn off their lights next Saturday as part of this WWF showboating, but for the minor detail that they don't have any and, even if they did, there isn't any electricity anyway. Despite that, no doubt, WWF will be able to claim as a success the fact that there will be so many darkened areas in Mongolia next week.

Some credit must be given, therefore, to The Sunday Telegraph which yesterday ran the story of the disastrous "druz", under the by-line of Peter Foster. It also told us that the UN and "aid organisations such as Save the Children" have issued an urgent appeal for assistance.

The reference to this charity is deeply suspicious, though. Its website makes no reference to an appeal and its last known direct involvement seems to have been in 2009 when it had teamed up with The Sun on a "Knit One Save One" campaign "to create bonnets to keep warm the little ones in harsh climates". 

In the more recent past, it seems to have been far more interested in gender equality in Canada than the children of Mongolia.

What, of course, is of special interest (to this blog) is how campaigners and self-interest groups have sought to invoke climate change as the main threat affecting the country, typically the World Bank with some evidence that much of the external support is being directed to "climate mitigation" measures rather than basic development needs.

However, Peter Foster seems to redress the balance somewhat, remarking how the numbers of animals on the pastures has doubled to an unsustainable 44 million and that grazing land has been chronically over-used, particularly by destructive, grubbing goats bred to feed the international demand for cashmere wool. 

With the crisis continuing to develop, this has prompted The Economist to have a closer look at what is going on, and it reports on a system of leasing pastures to Chinese companies which harvest the hay and ship it across the border, and a lack of roads which stops the herders marketing their produce at the best price, leaving them chronically poor.

To that extent, the current problems – and the lack of resilience, such as the current shortage of fodder – is in part man-made, something even the World Bank seems to acknowledge. Foster has it from Mongolian elders who remember the great dzuds of 1968 and 1944, and say the ability of modern Mongolian farmers to cope with the disaster has been diminished by a combination of greed and neglect.

Most telling of all though is that in this poverty-stricken country, the economic cost of this national disaster is put at $60 million, some $20 million less than the WWF have spent on not saving the Amazonian rainforest. In terms of where money might best be spent, not for the first time are moved to observe that priorities have become more than a little distorted.

COMMENT THREAD