 |
| Appease the Enemy, Beat Up the Friend Dear Harold, According to news reports over the past ten days, President Obama is said to be quite upset with Israel because of Israel’s latest announcement of new housing settlements. Apparently, Obama believes Hamas is serious about negotiating a peace agreement with Israel, and that the main thing standing in the way is Israel’s refusal to heed Hamas’ demand that it halt all new settlements. Even if Israel did so, would Hamas then recognize Israel’s right to exist—which it has refused to do? President Obama would do better to demand that Hamas—a terrorist organization—formally recognize Israel’s right to exist, than beat up on our ally Israel for building housing. The story below (highlights added) reveals how willing Obama is to humiliate an ally like Israel while appeasing our enemies. Just one more example of the kind of poor judgment that continues to erode American confidence that we will win the war on Islamic terrorism, as revealed in a recent Rasmussen poll. Binyamin Netanyahu humiliated after Barack Obama 'dumped him for dinner'  |
(AP Photo/Cliff Owen)
The President was said to have walked out of the meeting, saying to Mr Netanyahu: 'Let me know if there is
anything new'
Giles Whittell, Washington, and James Hider, Jerusalem
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7076431.ece
For a head of government to visit the White House and not pose for photographers is rare. For a key ally to be
left to his own devices while the President withdraws to have dinner in private was, until this week, unheard of.
Yet that is how Binyamin Netanyahu was treated by President Obama on Tuesday night, according to Israeli
reports on a trip viewed in Jerusalem as a humiliation.
After failing to extract a written promise of concessions on settlements, Mr Obama walked out of his meeting with
Mr Netanyahu but invited him to stay at the White House, consult with advisers and “let me know if there is anything new”, a US congressman, who spoke to the Prime Minister, said.
“It was awful,” the congressman said. One Israeli newspaper called the meeting “a hazing in stages”, poisoned by
such mistrust that the Israeli delegation eventually left rather than risk being eavesdropped on a White House
telephone line. Another said that the Prime Minister had received “the treatment reserved for the President of
Equatorial Guinea”.
Left to talk among themselves Mr Netanyahu and his aides retreated to the Roosevelt Room. He spent a further
half-hour with Mr Obama and extended his stay for a day of emergency talks to try to restart peace negotiations. However, he left last night with no official statement from either side. He returned to Israel yesterday isolated after
what Israeli media have called a White House ambush for which he is largely to blame.
Sources said that Mr Netanyahu failed to impress Mr Obama with a flow chart purporting to show that he was not responsible for the timing of announcements of new settlement projects in east Jerusalem. Mr Obama was said to
be livid when such an announcement derailed the visit to Israel by Joe Biden, the Vice-President, this month and
his anger towards Israel does not appear to have cooled.
Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, cast doubt on minor details in Israeli accounts of the meeting but
did not deny claims that it amounted to a dressing down for the Prime Minister, whose refusal to freeze settlements
is seen in Washington as the main barrier to resuming peace talks.
The Likud leader has to try to square the rigorous demands of the Obama Administration with his nationalist, ultra-Orthodox coalition partners, who want him to stand up to Washington even though Israel needs US backing in confronting the threat of a nuclear Iran.
“The Prime Minister leaves America disgraced, isolated and altogether weaker than when he came,” the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz said.
In their meeting Mr Obama set out expectations that Israel was to satisfy if it wanted to end the crisis, Israeli
sources said. These included an extension of the freeze on Jewish settlement growth beyond the ten-month
deadline next September, an end to building projects in east Jerusalem and a withdrawal of Israeli forces to
positions held before the second intifada in September 2000.
Newspaper reports recounted how Mr Netanyahu looked “excessively concerned and upset” when he pulled out a
flow chart to show Mr Obama how Jerusalem planning permission worked and how he could not have known that
the announcement that hundreds more homes were to be built would be made when Mr Biden arrived in Jerusalem.
Mr Obama then suggested that Mr Netanyahu and his staff stay at the White House to consider his proposals so
that if he changed his mind he could inform the President right away. “I’m still around,” the daily newspaper Yediot Aharonot quoted Mr Obama as saying. “Let me know if there is anything new.”
With the atmosphere so soured by the end of the evening, the Israelis decided that they could not trust the
telephone line they had been lent for their consultations. Mr Netanyahu and Ehud Barak, his Defence Minister,
went to the Israeli Embassy to ensure that the Americans were not listening in.
The meeting came barely a day after Mr Obama’s health reform victory. Israel had calculated that he would be
too tied up with domestic issues to focus seriously on the Middle East.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make sure you receive all of your messages from ACT for America. Add actforamerica@donationnet.net to your address book as an approved email sender. If you found this message in your "Bulk" or "Spam" folder, please click the "Not Spam" button to notify your provider that these are emails you want to receive.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org
Posts
