Wednesday, 10 March 2010 10:11 Wednesday, 10 March 2010 09:28 Gordon Brown wants to expand the government-operated DNA database in the UK Wednesday, 10 March 2010 09:20 'The Obama administration will accept no more public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing the nation’s oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters. This announcement comes at the time when the situation supposedly still is “fluid” and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force still hasn’t issued its final report on zoning uses of these waters. That’s a disappointment, but not really a surprise for fishing industry insiders who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force. These angling advocates have come to suspect that public input into the process was a charade from the beginning.' Read more: Government Ends Public Hearing on Plan to Prohibit Fishing Wednesday, 10 March 2010 09:02 'On Wednesday, Obama said he “would try to block the court-ordered release of photos showing U.S. troops abusing prisoners.” The release, which was to be the result of a Freedom of Information Act request made by the ACLU, had been reasonable in the final weeks of April, but today, Obama chose to come out against the release. According to the Associated Press, “out of concern [that] the pictures would "further inflame anti-American opinion" and endanger U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan” Obama planned to block them.'
Wednesday, 10 March 2010
'For 14 days straight, they relentlessly bannered the CTV national Olympic newscast with 911 signs etc. They were punched at, pushed, shoved, sworn at and threatened by numerous delusional sheeple mesmerized by the Olympic fanfare, but they still prevailed with an unprecedented amount of coverage.'
Gordon Brown makes another promise of expanding the UK's police state, but leaving the million innocent people on the DNA database, and promises to expand the database.
In the example he gives of how the DNA database was useful, he says that a person was caught using the database. In reality, as he said, the man was caught after an appeal on BBC Crimewatch, so was not caught by DNA, but by someone recognising a photo or description.
Posts
