Britannia Radio

from XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXjm...THANKS

Madness and Tyranny

Harold,

Put this on your site. It's bloody outrageous. Talk about a police
state.


Nigel's on Have I Got News For You at 9.30 tonight and Any Questions
tomorrow.

Regards.

Subject: Madness and Tyranny

Dear God What A Mess!


XXXXXXXXXXXXXGLT


1st April 2010

April Fool's Day dawns.......

A woman arrested, fined, given suspended prison sentence, tagged with 

the warning that she would have been sent to prison and so confined to 

her house from 7pm to 7am. The man that brought this prosecution and 

sentence stated, 'Let this be a lesson to all such thugs and criminals 

that abuse pets! We will not tolerate any such behaviour!' The old lady 

concerned will also lose her licence to sell pets and so her business 

of 28 years will go too. The Council are already taking steps to close 

her down. The words I report above spoken by the Council official 

concerned are the actual words spoken not the watered down ones printed 

in the newspapers. Her disgusting crime? Rape? Paedophilia? Armed 

robbery? Drug abuse and supply?- No she sold a gold fish to a very tall 

girl under the age allowed to sell pets to. The whole affair was an 

organised 'Sting' operation to catch the poor woman out. In another 

event, a 'sting op' too in Scotland, a number of homosexuals 

deliberately behaved in a manner, intentionally designed to outrage 

public decency, that still remains an imprisonable offence at Common 

Law by kissing in public and fondling each other in a lewd manner at a 

speech given by an American travelling preacher.

One of these men apparently shouted, 'What do you think of this?' as 

these filthy antics were going on in full public display and the 

preacher like an idiot told them it would send them to Hell. Two police 

officers then arrested the preacher soon afterwards. He was fined a 

thousand pounds and will probably not be allowed back into Britain from 

what I have been told. The Police officers too appear to have been 

laying in wait for the 'gays' to behave as they did- in other words- it 

was another 'setup'- to catch 'homophobes'. This type of behaviour, is 

so clearly designed to root out dissent and send a message of fear to 

the rest of us. Under English Common Law, it amounts to 'entrapment' 

and even 'procurement for immoral purposes' and the officers and 'gays' 

could well at some future date find themselves charged with 'collusion 

and public conspiracy to pervert justice' and 'public indecency'.

No political agenda in the world can justify such behaviour. The 

miscreants will be facing several years behind bars and the constables 

for 'abuse of public office', that carries a heavy sentence in fact in 

normal circumstances but we all now know that we do not live in 'normal 

times'. We are now not only expected to be tolerant of such offensive 

behaviour, deny our quite natural feelings of disgust but openly show 

our approval of it and the Police behaving like The Inquisition seeking 

out heretics and law breakers, by creating events to criminalise 

people, where otherwise no offence would have been committed. As people 

know I was once a lawyer myself.

The legal definition of entrapment is a situation where officers of the 

state deliberately create a context to literally make a crime happen, 

usually where one does not or would not exist otherwise. Entrapment is 

actually not a recognised defence in modern English Law and officials 

deliberately creating situations have always been given short shrift by 

judges, on the basis that it amounts to bad law and is unjust, even an 

offence against natural laws of liberty enshrined in Magna Carta, or to 

quote a Law Lord, 'An officer of the Crown's duty is not to create 

crime but to detect and prevent it's commission'. The situation 

criticised as 'entrapment' actually falls at Common Law under the 

umbrella of Conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice'. The Statute 

covering this is the 1977 Criminal Law Act- Subject to the following 

provisions of this Part of this Act, if a person agrees with any other 

person or persons that a course of conduct shall be pursued which, if 

the agreement is carried out in accordance with their intentions, 

either—

(a) will necessarily amount to or involve the commission of any offence 

or offences by one or more of the parties to the agreement, or

(b)would do so but for the existence of facts which render the 

commission of the offence or any of the offences impossible,he is 

guilty of conspiracy to commit the offence or offences in question.

As the 'gays' themselves colluded to 'outrage public decency', and 

arranged for the police to be present, this amounts to 'Conspiracy'. 

Outraging public decency is actually a Common Law offence....

Outraging public decency

This is a common law offence; offences committed after 20 January 2004 

are triable either way by virtue of Section 320 Criminal Justice Act 

2003 (brought into force by SI 2004/81 (C.2)).Offences Committed before 

that date are indictable only offences.

There is no statutory definition of the offence of outraging public 

decency it being a common law offence, but the definition of the 

offence adopted by the then Lord Chief Justice in the case of May 

(1990) 91 Cr.App.R. 157, the definition appearing at page 159, is this:

"So there must have been proved to have been an act of such a lewd, 

obscene or disgusting nature as to amount to an outrage on public 

decency. It is not necessary to prove that the act in fact disgusted 

those in whose purview it was committed. It is sufficient if it is 

calculated so to do. So far as the public nature of the offence is 

concerned, it must be proved that more than one person must at least 

have been able to see the act. If one person is proved to have seen the 

act and others might have seen it taking place, that is enough."

There is also an offence of conspiracy to outrage public decency

In S and G v United Kingdom (2 September 1991), application No 17634/91 

the Commission considered the common law offence of outraging public 

decency committed by an artist and art gallery curator who had 

exhibited a model with freeze dried human foetuses as earrings. The 

Commission, while recognising that freedom of artistic expression fell 

within the ambit of Article 10, declared the application inadmissible 

as being manifestly ill founded. It found that the offence of outraging 

public decency: (a) was prescribed by law, and (b) pursued the 

legitimate aim of protection of morals and (c) was not disproportionate 

and could be regarded as necessary in a democratic society.

Section 320 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: Offence of outraging 

public decency triable either way

Section 320 makes the offence of outraging public decency triable 

summarily in a magistrates' court as well as on indictment. The maximum 

penalties on summary conviction for this offence are to be those 

provided for by section 32(1) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980. 

These are currently six months' imprisonment or a fine of £5000 or 

both.

Of course the 'gays' were not arrested but encouraged to do as they did 

in order to 'entrap' the preacher. This is political and ideological 

policing, not impartial law application in order to ensure the Queen's 

Peace. Now let's examine 'Abuse of public Office'....

Principles

The elements of misconduct in public office are:

a) A public officer acting as such.

b) Wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconducts 

himself.

c) To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public's trust in 

the office holder.

d) Without reasonable excuse or justification.

Who is a Public Officer?

'' So who holds a public office and as a result can be guilty of this 

offence? According to the Court of Appeal, which quoted from the 

earlier authorities, it requires that the defendant "must be a public 

officer acting as such .... There must be a breach of duty by the 

officer, [which is wilful and which is such that the conduct is] an 

affront to the standing of the public office held. The threshold is a 

high one requiring conduct so far below acceptable standards as to 

amount to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder" (Para 

56). And later, quoting from the case of Bembridge [(1783) 3 Doug KB 

32], "those who hold public office carry out their duties for the 

benefit of the public as a whole and, if they abuse their office, there 

is a breach of the public's trust.''

It is about time the people of this land made a stand. We are not 

slipping into a Police State, we are in one! We are being 

systematically abused, lied too, robbed and defrauded by an entire 

Political Class and its compliant Police enforcers. Yet we do nothing!

We also have an autocrat who as the papers have reported at last, is 

planning to subvert our ancient Constitution by remaining in power in 

the event of a 'Hung Parliament'. People abused me when I revealed that 

I had 'insider knowledge' that Brown was planning on either avoiding an 

election or remaining as PM even if he lost on some pretext of a crisis 

deliberately created by him and his minions. Perhaps people will listen 

to me in future. We 'academics' are a bit like Heineken beer. We are 

able to 'reach those parts that other beers cannot reach!' to quote an 

old advert. I have an entire 'Intelligence' system and it is normally 

very reliable. If there is not a 'hung Parliament', Brown's Fellow 

Travellers intend to bring the country to a standstill through the 

Unions, so he can call ' A State of Emergency' under the Civil 

Contingencies Act 2006. When I questioned my informant about the risk 

of a public anger pushed too far, his words said it all....'The English 

herd will do nothing..at least that is what the spin doctors say... The 

'Proles' will simply swallow what we tell them! As long as they have 

their reality TV, David Beckham and 'Corrie', their cheap booze, they 

will remain supine and do as they are told. We can always send the 

boot-boys in anyway!'

We are in short run from top to bottom by crooks, racketeers, mobsters 

and ideological cranks and perverts who will stop at nothing from now, 

as they know full well they have free rein to do as they wish immune to 

The Rule of Law. Only their entire overthrow and replacement by a 

completely new system or retrenchment of the old, will suffice. For 

these nasty, corrupt, evil persons are guilty of Treason, sexual 

perversion and abuse, let alone the huge fraud propagated by so called 

'Global Warming' scam, in the coldest winter for thirty years. Now they 

are so desperate, they are making it illegal to question 'Global 

warming'. Then we have a situation like the above, where we must not 

only be tolerant of filth and lewdness but applaud it! In other words, 

we are all guilty of not being queer ourselves......

Today the temperature outside my house is -2 degrees centigrade. My car 

is covered in frost and the doors frozen shut. According to these laws 

I must walk out in my swim wear and sunglasses, declare in front of the 

local council officer, 'Oh isn't it hot!?', then light my barbecue up 

and freeze to death on my patio while doing my damndest to show off my 

ageing torso to the local 'gay rights' enforcement jobsworth, that I am 

actively not only ignoring my own 'unnatural' heterosexuality but 

openly trying to express my 'feminine side' to my queer next door 

neighbour, while I get my wife to stand by me in a Moslem 'burka', so 

my newly converted son beats her to death for breaking Sharia Law, by 

not following me at least five feet behind as I leap over the fence to 

seek consensual sex with my gay neighbour in full approving public 

view. Oh dear I forgot to amputate my hand and leg, because I stole the 

ketchup, from my own fridge and devoured a forbidden food, ate a fatty 

English breakfast and now the local Animal welfare police are after me 

to because my wife stuffed a goldfish down my trunks!

Like I said, 'What a bloody awful mess!' Yet we do sod all about it 

except sending endless e.mails like this. So who is going to call me 

'overemotional and a conspiracy theorist' now then eh? You? people get 

the government they deserve. And when good men do nothing Evil thrives- 

Well I have tried to do something ......

xxxxxxxxxxxG

and thnksxxxxxxxxxx ap

IF ONLY IT WAS JUST A FISHY TALE.   1.4.2010.

I am the youth, under age of course,
That was used by a man of power,
I was sent to trap some one,
A deed I may regret ever more.

I was too young to be used this way,
For I don’t know ‘right’ from ‘wrong’,
I did what I was asked to do,
Without much of a dance and song.

I am the one that sold that fish,
To a youth that seemed keen to buy,
An action I will live to regret,
For the rest of my days, till I die.

I am the fish that is protected by,
Those ‘uman rights YOU obey,
For I am free to swim around,
In a little round bowl all day.

I am such a little fish,
And I have more RIGHTS than you,
I have no laws I have to obey,
I can even put folk in prison too.

For I am now a ‘celebrity
In most “Daily’s” my fishy tale is told,
Yet you kill and eat other fish,
I’m now more precious than Gold.

But has our once great Justice system,
Once the envy throughout the world,
Paid the highest price of all,
As this tale is gradually unfurled?

Why did a tale about a Gold Fish,
Make us hang our heads in SHAME,
For it is those that passed these laws,
That should really take the blame.