ANOTHER BBC FANTASY
>> FRIDAY, MAY 28, 2010
Only on the BBC. Should the RAF be scrapped? It was on Today at 8.39am
I don't know how many of you came along to the Question Time Liveblog last evening but I just wanted to say that apart from the infamous post 9/11 QT, this programme was an utter disgrace. It became the Alistair Campbell/Piers Morgan roadshow, with Dimbleby constantly deferring to Campbell. I think it was right that the Coalition did not put forward a candidate and perhaps a boycott of QT by the new government would be a welcome development? The BBC has been leading news this morning on this subject, all part of it's zeal to see the Coalition divided.
BP = EVIL, A CONTINUED SERIES
Another day, another Obama outburst against BP. and the BBC lovingly carry this story on, Just after 7.09am and then again at 8.10am, the BBC agenda is to out to project "Big Oil" as corrupt, reckless and in need of further regulation. I thought the BP spokesman did well, given the provocation of the line of questions, but it is clear that the BBC is just an echo chamber for Obama-angst on this issue. 10 days into the crisis in the Gulf, Obama is finally travelling down to see the devastation. 10 DAYS - can you imagine how the BBC would have commented on this had it taken Bush 10 DAYS to travel to the crisis site? One set of rules for when a liberal is in the White House...
CARBON EMISSIONS, JIHAD SUBMISSIONS.
Only on the BBC! In a simpering item on Obama's new National Security Policy (circa 6.15am) I double checked when I heard the BBC commentators approvingly agree that "global warming" was a cause of international terrorism. The "sophisticated" approach of Obama and his repudiation of the Bush doctrine obviously rings the BBC bell.
REVOLTING ROYAL SOCIETY
Roger Harrabin reports here on the Royal Society being forced to review its pro-AGW fanatcism by a revolt of members. I note, despite his uncharacteristic inclusion of some of the thoughts of those who support the revolt,that he still maintains that climate change propaganda is "very widely believed"(no doubt whose side he is on)and he still drones on about the importance of "consensus", as if scientific truth was reached by the same process as electing a member of parliament.
Posts
