Britannia Radio

 

 

Our World: Hamas rises in the West

By CAROLINE GLICK,

The Jerusalem Post

June 15, 2010

By backing the terrorist group against Israel, western countries are

backing Hamas against Fatah and Islamist states against ME moderates.

Since the navy’s May 31 takeover of the Turkish-Hamas flotilla, Prime

Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his advisers have deliberated around

the clock about how to contend with the US-led international stampede

against Israel. But their ultimate decision to form an investigatory

committee led by a retired Supreme Court justice and overseen by

foreign observers indicates that they failed to recognize the nature

of the international campaign facing us today.

Led by US President Barack Obama, the West has cast its lot with

Hamas. It is not surprising that Obama is siding with Hamas. His close

associates are leading members of the pro-Hamas Free Gaza outfit.

Obama’s friends, former Weather Underground terrorists Bernadine Dohrn

and William Ayres participated in a Free Gaza trip to Egypt in

January. Their aim was to force the Egyptians to allow them into Gaza

with 1,300 fellow Hamas supporters. Their mission was led by Code Pink

leader and Obama fund-raiser Jodie Evans. Another leading member of

Free Gaza is James Abourezk, a former US senator from South Dakota.

All of these people have open lines of communication not only to the

Obama White House, but to Obama himself.

Obama has made his sympathy for the Muslim Brotherhood clear several

times since entering office. The Muslim Brotherhood’s progeny include

Hamas, al-Qaida and the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Last June, Obama

infuriated the Egyptian government when he insisted on inviting

leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood to attend his speech at Al Azhar

University in Cairo. His administration’s decision to deport Hamas

deserter and Israeli counterterror operative Mosab Hassan Yousef to

the Palestinian Authority where he will be killed is the latest sign

of its support for radical Islam.

Given Obama’s attitude toward jihadists and the radical leftists who

support them, his decision to support Hamas against Israel makes

sense. What is alarming however is how leaders of the free world are

now all siding with Hamas. That support has become ever more apparent

since the Mossad’s alleged killing of Hamas terror master Mahmoud

al-Mabhouh at his hotel in Dubai in January.

In the aftermath of Mabhouh’s death, both Britain and Australia joined

the Dubai-initiated bandwagon in striking out against Israel. Israel

considers both countries allies, or at least friendly and has close

intelligence ties with both. Yet despite their close ties, Australia

and Britain expelled Israeli diplomats who supposedly had either a

hand in the alleged operation or who work for the Mossad.

It should be noted that neither country takes steps against outspoken

terror supporters who call for Israel to be destroyed and call for the

murder of individual Israelis.

For instance, in an interview last month with The Australian, Ali

Kazak, the former PLO ambassador to Australia, effectively solicited

the murder of The Jerusalem Post’s Palestinian affairs correspondent

Khaled Abu Toameh. Kazak told the newspaper, “Khaled Abu Toameh is a

traitor.”

Allowing that many Palestinians have been murdered for such

accusations, Kazak excused those extrajudicial murders saying,

“Traitors were also murdered by the French Resistance, in Europe; this

happens everywhere.”

Not only did Australia not expel Kazak or open a criminal

investigation against him, as a consequence of his smear campaign

against Abu Toameh, several Australians cancelled their scheduled

meetings with him.

AND OF course, this week we have the actions of Germany and Poland.

They are considered Israel’s best friends in Europe, and yet acting on

a German arrest warrant, Poland has arrested a suspected Mossad

officer named Uri Brodsky for his alleged involvement in the alleged

Mossad operation against Mabhouh. Israel is now caught in a diplomatic

disaster zone where its two closest allies  who again are only too

happy to receive regular intelligence updates from the Mossad  are

siding with Hamas against it.

And then of course we have the EU’s call for Israel to cancel its

lawful blockade of the Gaza coast. That is, the official position of

the EU is that an Iranian proxy terrorist organization should be

allowed to gain control over a Mediterranean port and through it,

provide Iran with yet another venue from which it can launch attacks

against Europe.

For their part, the Sunni Arabs are forced to go along with this. The

Egyptian regime considers the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood took

over Gaza a threat to its very survival and has been assiduously

sealing its border with Gaza for some time. And yet, unable to be more

anti-Hamas than the US, Australia and Europe, Mubarak is opening the

border. Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa’s unprecedented visit

to Gaza this week should be seen as a last ditch attempt by Egypt to

convince Hamas to unify its ranks with Fatah. Predictably, the

ascendant Hamas refused his entreaties.

As for Fatah, it is hard not to feel sorry for its leader Mahmoud

Abbas these days. In what was supposed to be a triumphant visit to the

White House, Abbas was forced to smile last week as Obama announced

the US will provide $450 million in aid to his sworn enemies who three

years ago ran him and his Fatah henchmen out of Gaza.

So too, Abbas is forced to cheer as Obama pressures Israel to give

Hamas an outlet to the sea. This will render it impossible for Fatah

to ever unseat Hamas either by force or at the ballot box. Hamas’s

international clout demonstrates to the Palestinians that jihad pays.

THERE ARE three plausible explanations for the West’s decision to back

Hamas. All of them say something deeply disturbing about the state of

the world. The first plausible explanation is that the Americans and

the rest of the West are simply naïve. They believe that by backing

Hamas, they are advancing the cause of Middle East peace.

If this is in fact what the likes of Obama and his European and

Australian counterparts think, apparently no one in the West is

thinking very hard. The fact is that by backing Hamas against Israel,

they are backing Hamas against Fatah and they are backing Iran, Syria,

Turkey, Hamas and Hizbullah against Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

They are backing the most radical actors in the region  and arguably

in the world  against states and regimes they have a shared strategic

interest in strengthening.

There is absolutely no way this behavior advances the cause of peace.

The second plausible explanation is that the West’s support for Hamas

is motivated by hatred of Israel. As Helen Thomas’s recent remarks

demonstrated, there is certainly a lot of that going around.

The final plausible explanation for the West’s support for Hamas is

that it has been led to believe that by acting as it is, it will buy

itself immunity from attack by Hamas and its fellow members of the

Iranian axis. As former Italian president Francesco Cossiga first

exposed in a letter to Corriere della Serra in August 2008, in the

early 1970s Italian prime minister Aldo Moro signed a deal with Yasser

Arafat that gave the PLO and its affiliated organizations the freedom

to operate terror bases in Italy. In exchange the Palestinians agreed

to limit their attacks to Jewish and Israeli targets. Italy maintained

its allegiance to the deal  and to the PLO against Israel  even when

Italian targets were hit.

Cossiga told the newspaper that the August 2, 1980 bombing at the

Bologna train station  which Italy blamed on Italian fascists  was

actually the work of George Habash’s Popular Front for the Liberation

of Palestine. Eighty-five people were murdered in the attack, and

still Italy maintained its agreement with the PLO to the point where

it prosecuted and imprisoned the wrong people for the worst terrorist

attack in its history.

Cossiga alleged that the deal is still in place today and that Italian

forces in UNIFIL have expanded the deal to include Hamas’s fellow

Iranian proxy Hizbullah. It isn’t much of a stretch to consider the

possibility that Italy and the rest of the Western powers have made a

similar deal with Hamas. And it is no stretch at all to believe that

they will benefit from it as greatly as the Italian railroad

passengers in Bologna did.

True, no one has come out and admitted to supporting Hamas. So too, no

one has expressed anything by love for Israel and the Jewish people.

But the actions of the governments of the West tell a different tale.

Without one or more of the explanations above, it is hard to

understand their current policies.

Since the flotilla incident, Netanyahu and his ministers have held

marathon deliberations on how to respond to US pressure to accept an

international inquisition into the IDF’s lawful enforcement of the

legal blockade of the Gaza coast. Their deliberations went on at the

same time as Netanyahu and his envoys attempted to convince Obama to

stop his mad rush to give Hamas an outlet to the sea and deny Israel

even the most passive right of self-defense.

It remains to be seen if their decision to form an investigative panel

with international “observers” was a wise move or yet another

ill-advised concession to an unappeasable administration. What is

certain, however, is that it will not end the West’s budding romance

with Hamas.

The West’s decision to side with Hamas is devastating. But whatever

the reasons for it, it is a fact of life. It is Netanyahu’s duty to

swallow this bitter pill and devise a strategy to protect the country

from their madness.

caroline@carolineglick.com