WAKE UP-ALL OF YOU-BEFORE ITS TOO LATE! FRONT PAGE OF ECONOMIST+ CONTENT-LETTER SIGNED - BILL CLINTON-VIDEO OF ROMPUY-RECORDING- J. LOEFFLER +D. CUDDY

Wednesday, 9 December 2009

WAKE UP-ALL OF YOU-BEFORE ITS TOO LATE! FRONT PAGE OF ECONOMIST+ CONTENT-LETTER SIGNED - BILL CLINTON-VIDEO OF ROMPUY-RECORDING- J. LOEFFLER +D. CUDDY

WE HAVE BEEN TELLING YOU ALL THIS WAS HAPPENING -FOR OVER 5-7 YEARS.-INSTEAD OF SCREAMING AT US AND SAYING NUTTER YOU BETTER START BELIEVING AND DO SOMETHING- LIKE SUPPORTING THIS SITE! SO WE CAN START BROADCASTING!

http://britanniaradio.blogspot.com/2009/04/cover-get-ready-for-world-currency.html

Global Governance - EU President Admits One-World Government is Here NWO - New World Order-

Here's the key quote from Rompuy: "2009 is also the first year of global governance, with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet."

TCCTV
November 25, 2009
(less info)
Once derided as a "myth" or a "conspiracy theory," the reality of a global or one-world government is heard loud and clear in this revealing video that world leaders indeed are enacting a global government. Newly appointed (not elected) EU Council President Herman Van Rompuy admits the G-20 and Copenhagen Climate Summit are part of creating one government to rule the world (the dream of dictators for all time).

It may be since the Lisbon Treaty was finally forced through by threatening Irish voters, that there is no further need for maintaining the fiction that the EU, UN and other internationalist entities are not a one world government-in-waiting.

Here's the key quote from Rompuy: "2009 is also the first year of global governance, with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet."

Rompuy is also a strong advocate of abolishing the very concept of national identities in the EU, including eliminating the use of national flags, symbols, even the names of sports teams would have to be stripped of flags and national identities! Couple this with leaked maps of proposed new European borders which would scrap any mention of national names or borders and carve Europe into legislative regions across borders--and even renaming the English Channel the "Channel Sea;" and to abolish even the use of the name of any former nation!

It is a lie that the EU is merely a group of independent nations. the truth is since the Lisbon Treaty was rammed through, that the EU owns 27 regional governing authorities.

Let that be a warning for the plans for a "North American Community" or "Union." USA, Mexico and Canada would be owned and subservient to a NAU super-government.

LET'S STOP THIS OUTRAGE--WHILE WE CAN:
We are Americans and free people, and must fight back to block any world government which would supplant our Constitution and freedoms with a Socialist regime led by the UN or regional power "unions."

This is a special public service announcement brought to you by The Conservative Caucus, America's Constitutional Government Action Organization. Producer, Art Harman.

Visit our websites for more information and lobbying tips:
http://www.ConservativeUSA.org
http://www.NAUWarRoom.com
http://www.HowardPhillips.com
=================================

Global Governance - EU-Präsident räumt Eine-Welt Regierung ist hier NWO - New World Order

Einst als "Mythos" oder eine "Verschwörungstheorie verhöhnt," die Realität einer globalen oder Eine-Welt Regierung ist laut und deutlich in diesem Video enthüllt, dass weltweit führend sind in der Tat verfügenden Teil einer globalen Regierung. Neu ernannt (nicht gewählt) EU-Ratsvorsitzende Herman Van Rompuy räumt die G-20-und Kopenhagen-Klima-Gipfel sind Teil der Schaffung einer Regierung die Welt zu regieren (der Traum von Diktatoren aller Zeiten).

Es kann sein, da der Vertrag von Lissabon wurde schließlich mit der Drohung durch die irischen Wähler gezwungen, dass es keine weitere Notwendigkeit für die Aufrechterhaltung der Fiktion, dass die EU, UNO und anderen internationalistischen sich dabei nicht um eine Welt-Regierung im Wartestand.

Hier ist der Schlüssel Rompuy Zitat aus: "2009 ist auch das erste Jahr der" Global Governance, mit der Gründung der G20 in der Mitte der Finanzkrise. Die Klimakonferenz in Kopenhagen ist ein weiterer Schritt in Richtung auf das globale Management unseres Planeten. "

Rompuy ist auch ein starker Verfechter der Abschaffung der Begriff der nationalen Identität in der EU, einschließlich der Einstellung der Verwendung von Flaggen, Symbole, auch die Namen von Sportmannschaften müsste Flaggen und nationale Identität beraubt werden! Verbinden Sie dieses mit zugespielt Karten der vorgeschlagenen neuen europäischen Grenzen, die jede Erwähnung von Namen oder nationalen Grenzen und schnitzen Europa in neuen rechtlichen und Regionen in ganz alten historischen Grenzen - und sogar das Umbenennen der englischen Kanal "Channel Sea Schrott würde," und auch die Abschaffung die Verwendung des Namens eines ehemaligen Nation!

Es ist eine Lüge, dass die EU nur eine Gruppe von unabhängigen Staaten. Die Wahrheit ist, da der Vertrag von Lissabon gerammt wurde durch die EU verfügt über 27 regionale Behörden, und sie ist auf dem Weg zur EU-Bürger besitzen.

Das sei eine Warnung für die Pläne für eine "North American Community" oder "Union werden." USA, Mexiko und Kanada würde gehören und den Dienst eines NAU Super-Regierung.
=================================
Van Rompuy spreekt open over de realisatie van de wereldregering

WE BEEN TELLING YOU ALL FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND YEARS; 

INSTEAD OF SHOUTING -NUTTER- 

YOU ALL BETTER LISTEN AND DO SOMETHING-

LIKE SUPPORTING OUR SITE AND DONATING 

SO WE CAN START OUR BROADCASTING STATION.

COVER: "GET READY FOR A WORLD CURRENCY"

thanks to jc for article.

Title of article: Get Ready for the Phoenix Source: Economist;

01/9/88, Vol. 306, pp 9-10

THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let's say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today's national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century.

At the beginning of 1988 this appears an outlandish prediction. Proposals for eventual monetary union proliferated five and ten years ago, but they hardly envisaged the setbacks of 1987. The governments of the big economies tried to move an inch or two towards a more managed system of exchange rates - a logical preliminary, it might seem, to radical monetary reform. For lack of co-operation in their underlying economic policies they bungled it horribly, and provoked the rise in interest rates that brought on the stock market crash of October. These events have chastened exchange-rate reformers. The market crash taught them that the pretence of policy co-operation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (i.e., until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.

But in spite of all the trouble governments have in reaching and (harder still) sticking to international agreements about macroeconomic policy, the conviction is growing that exchange rates cannot be left to themselves. Remember that the Louvre accord and its predecessor, the Plaza agreement of September 1985, were emergency measures to deal with a crisis of currency instability. Between 1983 and 1985 the dollar rose by 34% against the currencies of America's trading partners; since then it has fallen by 42%. Such changes have skewed the pattern of international comparative advantage more drastically in four years than underlying economic forces might do in a whole generation.

In the past few days the world's main central banks, fearing another dollar collapse, have again jointly intervened in the currency markets

(see page 62).(Pg 62 is an advertisment, para 4 says pg 66 j's edit ) Market-loving ministers such as Britain's Mr. Nigel Lawson have been converted to the cause of exchange-rate stability. Japanese officials take seriously he idea of EMS-like schemes for the main industrial economies. Regardless of the Louvre's embarrassing failure, the conviction remains that something must be done about exchange rates.

Something will be, almost certainly in the course of 1988. And not long after the next currency agreement is signed it will go the same way as the last one. It will collapse. Governments are far from ready to subordinate their domestic objectives to the goal of international stability. Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stockmarket crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice. This points to a muddled sequence of emergency followed by a patch-up followed by emergency, stretching out far beyond

2018 - except for two things. As time passes, the damage caused by currency instability is gradually going to mount; and the very tends that will make it mount are making the utopia of monetary union feasible.

The new world economy

The biggest change in the world economy since the early 1970's is that flows of money have replaced trade in goods as the force that drives exchange rates. as a result of the relentless integration of the world's financial markets, differences in national economic policies can disturb interest rates (or expectations of future interest rates) only slightly, yet still call forth huge transfers of financial assets from one country to another. These transfers swamp the flow of trade revenues in their effect on the demand and supply for different currencies, and hence in their effect on exchange rates. As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still. With unco-ordinated economic policies, currencies can get only more volatile.

Alongside that trend is another - of ever-expanding opportunities for international trade. This too is the gift of advancing technology. Falling transport costs will make it easier for countries thousands of miles apart to compete in each others' markets. The law of one price (that a good should cost the same everywhere, once prices are converted into a single currency) will increasingly assert itself. Politicians permitting, national economies will follow their financial markets - becoming ever more open to the outside world. This will apply to labour as much as to goods, partly thorough migration but also through technology's ability to separate the worker form the point at which he delivers his labour. Indian computer operators will be processing New Yorkers' paychecks.

In all these ways national economic boundaries are slowly dissolving. As the trend continues, the appeal of a currency union across at least the main industrial countries will seem irresistible to everybody except foreign-exchange traders and governments. In the phoenix zone, economic adjustment to shifts in relative prices would happen smoothly and automatically, rather as it does today between different regions within large economies (a brief on pages 74-75 explains how .)

(This is incorrect, the hard copy says pg 70-71, see hard copy pdf attachment)

The absence of all currency risk would spur trade, investment and employment.

The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate - and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate- would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.

As the next century approaches, the natural forces that are pushing the world towards economic integration will offer governments a broad choice. They can go with the flow, or they can build barricades. Preparing the way for the phoenix will mean fewer pretended agreements on policy and more real ones. It will mean allowing and then actively promoting the private-sector use of an international money alongside existing national monies. That would let people vote with their wallets for the eventual move to full currency union. The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.

The alternative - to preserve policymaking autonomy- would involve a new proliferation of truly draconian controls on trade and capital flows. This course offers governments a splendid time. They could manage exchange-rate movements, deploy monetary and fiscal policy without inhibition, and tackle the resulting bursts of inflation with prices and incomes polices. It is a growth-crippling prospect. Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.

Copyright of The Economist is the property of Economist Newspaper Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

h.hoffman's blog

WE'VE BEEN TELLING YOU THIS SINCE 2003, AT LEAST. TOLD YOU ALL SO! ONE DAY YOU'LL BELIEVE US! 04/11/2009 New Words for a New World click to listen also note interviews with Dr Dennis Cuddy and Harold Hoffman: scroll down right to Conversations to Remember The world is passing through profound paradigm shifts rights now so we're planning to "hyperfocus" on just a couple of key items this weekend. First John produces an extended boralogue on the new emerging global economic system and a vocabulary emerging from the G20 summit, including "transnationalism" and "responsible sovereignty." What does it all mean? One of those G20 phrases is -- surprise surprise -- the time-tried "new world order." So does this mean all our politicians are now conspiracy theorists? Perhaps an examination of the 100-year history of that expression would be in order. We'll run clips from a Steel on Steel show from 14 years ago. Then historian Dr. Dennis Cuddy, author of "The New World Order and the Road to Socialism," returns to check on what the globalists are cooking up in the midst of the universal economic crisis.