Tuesday, 31 August 2010

If these proposed EU Directives go ahead, there is no point in paying or voting ever again for any British MP or Government that can no longer put their own Country first.

Certainly no British person can possibly make any payment via their taxes to any foreign organisation to govern us because it may well be seen as treason according to own Common Law Constitution, (See R v Thistlewood 1820, to destroy the Constitution is an act of Treason) for our allegiance is to the British Crown and our own Country ALWAYS, not to foreigners.


Baring in mind the financial position the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is allegedly in "today" with many people losing their jobs and homes, why on earth would our British Government activate an EU Directive on Integrated Road Transport system and a phased approached to a common Transport Infrastructure Charging Framework in the UK at this present time?

All on the news tonight.

Yet we also read today that we might even "share" a new Aircraft Carrier with a foreign Country, France. (In the newspapers today). The Defence of our Country is the most important matter of all and must comes before any ROAD PRICING. This Country must never ever be in the position it was in, in 1939 again. I find it hard to believe a British Government would even consider "sharing" an Aircraft Carrier with a foreign Country, all-be it, our nearest neighbour, France. Is this move in an endeavour to become part of the EU's "Motorway in the Seas"?

We are aware that the EU Navy has been in action off the Coast of Somalia. The EU Commission's case for the Maritime Policy is along the lines that: "The EU is surrounded by four seas and two oceans. Just as environmental, transport or security problems cross-administrative borders on land, so do they at sea. These problems therefore also have to be tackled at EU level". So, will the EU have control of our Sovereign coastal waters? Which of course includes all that is in them, on them and under the sea bed. Undiscovered oil and minerals etc? Britain never more to "Rule the Waves"?

Very r
ecently on TV we were also shown on News-Reels how angry people were at the thought of the High Speed rail link coming near their home and some to be demolished This fantastically high cost of the EU’s Trans-European high-speed rail network from London to Birmingham firstly, and eventually to Manchester, an EU
proposal once more and all that THAT EU project entails plus the COSTS and compensation to families etc.

We simply cannot afford all these EU integration at this point in time, even if EVER. We cannot afford to lose "sovereinty" over them either.

These are foreigners
telling an alleged sovereign British Government what they must do on sovereign British Soil. (Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996) and sovereign British Roads and the sovereign seas round our Coast.

The terrible permanent loss of British Sovereignty on all of those because we are talking of EU foreign laws being applied directly on British sovereign soil.

Something far too many people have given their lives in protecting for the likes of Governments that seem to have no sense of loyalty to their own people that elected them, apparently no allegiance to their own country for they look to foreign laws before their own Country, and certainly even less loyalty for the Gurkhas that have gallantly and loyally served this Country for over 200 years, for it even looks as if this coalition Government is contemplating closing down the Gurkha Regiment.

WHY?

It is the EU we cannot afford to be in, it has bled us dry already. We pay billions each year plus other EU Agencies. Our Government is even paying the EU Defence Agency (over £4 million for 2010) while our forces are fighting in Afghanistan and our forces have died because of shortage of protective gear.-may God forgive them.

If these proposed EU Directives go ahead, there is no point in paying or voting ever again for any British MP or Government that can no longer put their own Country first.

Certainly no British person can possibly make any payment via their taxes to any foreign organisation to govern us because it may well be seen as treason according to own Common Law Constitution, (See R v Thistlewood 1820, to destroy the Constitution is an act of Treason) for our allegiance is to the British Crown and our own Country ALWAYS, not to foreigners.

Anne