Posted by Pamela Geller on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 12:14 AM | Permalink | Comments (58) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! The Muslim groups are fighting for credit for killing these two Jewish couples in cold blood. And the world stands silent and the UN aids and abets jihad. And Obama? Our worst nightmare. This on the eve of "peace" talks. Four Jews Murdered in Arab Terror Attack Near Hevron Arutz Sheva Terrorists murdered four Jewish civilians in a shooting attack at the Bani Naim junction just south of Hevron Tuesday evening.Emergency service paramedics could do nothing to save the victims whose bodeis were riddled with numerous bullets. The terrorists reportedly made sure their victims were dead by shooting them from close range after the initial fusillade. According to report on Channel 2 television, the victims are two couples, and one of them is a pregnant woman. The IDF is combing the area, searching for the terrorists. Initial reports said one of the victims had a license for a firearm that was suspended shortly before the attack. Hamas and Fatah are blaming each other for the terror attack. Posted by Pamela Geller on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 02:31 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! Thought you might like to see this piece Mark Hosenball did on the EDL. Clearly the left is attempting to split the counter jihad movement. They want me to distance myself from brave souls fighting Islamic supremacism. N-O-T G-O-I-N-G T-O H-A-P-P-E-N. If I lived in England, I would surely be active in the EDL Jewish division. Members of the EDL will be attending our rally to stop the Ground Zero Islamic supremacist mosque on September 11th (be there). Read the whole thing. Newsweak's bias is obvious, but at least they published my responses. That is, in itself, a small victory: Excerpt: N.Y. Anti-Mosque Leader Defends Group That Clashed With British Police Mark Hosenball, Newsweek Pamela Geller is a conservative blogger, activist, and a principal organizer of Stop Islamization of America (SIOA), which seeks to block construction of the proposed center. The group is sponsoring a protest rally at the site on the 2010 anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, a week from Saturday. In a posting on her Atlas Shrugs blog, Geller expresses sympathy for the goals and actions of the English Defense League (EDL), a far-right group implicated in violent clashes with police during an anti-Islamic demonstration last Saturday in the northern English city of Bradford. "The stated goal of the EDL is to oppose militant Islam and the sharia," Geller writes. "What's wrong with that? Everything to the PC, leftist slaves in the media and the government." In an e-mail to Declassified, Geller affirmed her support for the EDL and defended the group's actions in Bradford, which, with its nearby sister city of Leeds, has a substantial Muslim population, many of Pakistani extraction. [....] Geller wrote: "The media has been defamatory and libelous towards any and all counter jihad activists, including the EDL, which far from being neo-Nazi and racist, is pro-Israel and has Sikh and other non-white members and spokesmen. The EDL's own explanation of what happened in Bradford is here. As you can see from that statement, a group of Islamic supremacists and Communists actually began the violence by throwing rocks at EDL members. White supremacists at the demonstration did not represent the EDL, and EDL members actually removed them from the demonstration." [...] By her own account, Geller's support of the EDL and other anti-Muslim groups in the U.K. has put her at odds with what are considered mainstream groups representing Britain's Jewish community. In an interview with the conservative FrontPage Magazine Web site, Geller claims that rabbis and prominent Jewish groups in Britain had urged Jews to boycott a demonstration that a group called Stop the Islamization of Europe (SIOE) organized last December to protest plans to build a mosque in the North London neighborhood of Harrow. According to Geller, the Community Security Trust, which keeps watch on extremist and anti-Semitic activities in the U.K., much like the Anti-Defamation League does in the U.S., urged Jews not to support the SIOE protest, as did unnamed rabbis who said the protest's "only purpose" was "to spread hatred and fear." Geller accused U.K. Jewish groups like the CST of "aiding and abetting Islamic jihad and Islamic anti-Semitism." A person familiar with the views of British Jewish leaders, who asked for anonymity when discussing sensitive information, said mainstream Jewish groups regarded the English Defense League as "politicized football hooligans." In an e-mail to Declassified, Geller acknowledged that some epithets that The Telegraph attributed to EDL protesters in Bradfordwere "in bad taste, although in saying that I am not accepting the accuracy of The Telegraph account, and also understand that words said in anger are not always words the speakers would endorse in moments of reflection." In a move apparently designed to avoid such embarrassments at her group's upcoming 9/11 event, she said, "We have already published several notices warning that inflammatory signs will be removed." Geller said the EDL itself acknowledged that there may have been neo-Nazi thugs among its ranks: "The left and real neo-Nazis frequently attempt to infiltrate EDL rallies in order to discredit the EDL. This is amply documented. Both have an interest in seeing the EDL fail: the left so that there will be no serious resistance to its agenda, and the neo-Nazis so that there exists no respectable alternative to them in opposing the British elite, and also because the neo-Nazis have generally aligned with the Islamic jihad that the EDL resists." She added that while she would not assert that the EDL "can do no wrong, I just refuse to accept accounts of EDL misdeeds from sources that have been proven in the past to have lied about EDL activities." Posted by Pamela Geller on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 01:59 PM in COUNTER JIHAD FRONT | Permalink | Comments (2) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! Following are excerpts from an Al-Jazeera TV report about Muslim U.S. soldier Nasser Abdo, who has refused to be deployed to Afghanistan. The report aired on August 21, 2010, and included clips of Abdo praying in his home while wearing his Army camouflage uniform. According to the report, his wife in Canada runs a website to raise money for Abdo's legal campaign, and he has retained a lawyer. To view this clip on MEMRI TV, visit http://www.memri.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/2594.htm Reporter: "The Muslim U.S. soldier Nasser Abdo prays five times a day where he lives near the Fort Campbell base in Kentucky, from where some 5,000 soldiers are to be sent to Afghanistan as part of President Obama's plan, which strives to eliminate the Taliban. Abdo's fellow soldiers are preparing for deployment to Afghanistan soon, according to their orders. But this Muslim soldier is refusing to be sent with his unit, because, he exclaims, as a Muslim he is forbidden to kill Muslims." Nasser Abdo: "I don't believe I can involve myself in an army that wages war against Muslims. I don't believe I could sleep at night if I take part, in any way, in the killing of a Muslim." Reporter: "Nasser says that he has chosen to live his life according to the teachings of Islam. Therefore, he has requested – in accordance with U.S. law – to be discharged from service, because this runs counter to the teachings of his religion. But he says that his commanders have been procrastinating, and to this day, have not given him a clear answer. He has decided not to go to Afghanistan, even though he knows that he might face two years in prison." Nasser Abdo: "They haven't processed my packet at all. I even heard from my unity commander that they lost my military record. I can't deploy with my unit to Afghanistan and participate in the war – I can't both deploy and be a Muslim." Reporter: "The armed command at Fort Campbell issued a written statement in response to our questions regarding the case of serviceman Nasser Abdo, according to which the U.S. army recognizes that a soldier's religious beliefs may change over time. It said, however, that discharge is an administrative procedure that takes six months. "Army sources told Al-Jazeera TV that the serviceman Nasser would not be sent to Afghanistan within the next few days, and that his application was under review, but the final decision whether to send him to Afghanistan or not was up to his direct commander in Fort Campbell. For his part, serviceman Nasser Abdo expects to get his deployment orders at any moment. "It is a military secret, and therefore serviceman Nasser Abdo cannot tell us when his unit will be headed to Afghanistan. It will, however, be soon, and Abdo will not be with them. He will, apparently, be facing a prison sentence. "He has one lawyer, and his wife from Canada runs a website to raise money to finance his defense. The family of serviceman Nasser Abdo is preparing for a lengthy and bitter legal battle. "This is Nasser Hussein, Al-Jazeera TV, from Kentucky." Posted by Pamela Geller on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 11:53 AM in US MILITARY GREATNESS and Real American Heroes | Permalink | Comments (33) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! Laughable if it weren't so serious ......... imposing Islam on the secular marketplace. Mother is denied pill by Muslim pharmacist The Telegraph hat tip Amil Imani A woman was refused the "morning-after pill" by a supermarket's duty pharmacist because it was against his religious beliefs. Miss Johnson was told it could only be dispensed by the locum pharmacist who was called to speak with her. She said: "He came out from behind a screen and told me that he would not be allowing me to buy the pill from him because he had a right to refuse to sell it on the basis of his personal beliefs. "The pharmacist was of Asian origin so I asked him if it was because of his religion and he replied 'Yes'." Miss Johnson, from Cleethorpes, was left feeling ashamed and worried and complained to the store manager who told her they couldn't force the pharmacist to sell the product. She said: "I asked him if a Jewish or Muslim checkout operator could refuse to sell pork or alcohol or if a Jehovah's Witness could refuse to sell birthday and Christmas cards." Her concern is that the policy could deter teenage girls from seeking the morning-after pill. "I appreciate we live in a multi-cultural society but what gives him the right to impose his beliefs onto me?" she added. Posted by Pamela Geller on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM in Eurabia 2010 | Permalink | Comments (27) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! One of the worst developments to emerge in the Ground Zero mega mosque attack is the platform being given to Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas funder groups on mainstream media news channels. These subversive organizations are working to destroy us. There are so many Muslims of conscience against this mosque, why would media choose subversives to represent the American Muslim community? Would American media have promoted Goebbels or Himmler or Hitler sympathizers as representative of German Americans when allied forces were at war with the axis powers? It's the same thing. FBI refuses to cave in to Hamas-linked CAIR's intimidation tactics over Spencer invitation A month after the Hamas-linked Islamic supremacist hate group CAIR tried to intimidate the FBI into apologizing for inviting me to speak in Virginia some time ago, Politico noticed the story and asked the FBI about it. The FBI, which is on to CAIR, wouldn't throw the wolves any red meat. "FBI defends invitation to Islam critic," by Ben Smith at Politico, August 31: The Council on American Islamic Relations complained late last month that Robert Spencer, who runs the Jihad Watch site and is co-founder of Stop the Islamization of America, had spoken to the Tidewater Joint Terrorism Task Force, a combination of state, federal, and local law enforcement centered in Norfolk, Virginia. Spencer, along with his confrontational stand toward the New York project, has long been at odds with Muslim leaders for alleging links between American Muslim leaders and extremism. He has also been a critic of the religion of Islam itself, suggesting that the historical Mohammed, for instance, did not exist, and that the portrayal of him in the Qaran [sic] is of a "con man." Highly compressed and tendentious. A fictional con man? This is what happens when ideologically biased reporters in a hurry try to summarize positions they don't understand. But the chief division for the Norfolk FBI field office, Phil Mann, defended the invitation to Spencer. "We invite speakers who represent a variety of viewpoints and the special agent in charge of the Norfolk office has invited local Muslim leaders to speak to his staff. That doesn’t mean we enodrse [sic] our [sic] adopt the view of any particular speaker," Mann said. "Broad knowledge is essential for us to better understand and respond to the threats that we face. Knowledge also helps us defeat ignorance and strengthen relationships with the diverse communites that we serve." [...] Spencer responded to a question about CAIR's attack with a link to his own press release on the matter, dismissing CAIR as a "hate group" and citing praise of his work from prominent conservatives. Smith doesn't tell his readers, of course, that CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Nor does he mention that CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case. Or that several of its former officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. Or that two of its other officials have made Islamic supremacist statements. Nor does he mention that CAIR also was involved in the Flying Imams' intimidation suit against the passengers who reported their suspicious behavior. CAIR's attempt to intimidate the FBI and JTTF and dictate their choice of speakers contained numerous false charges, defamation, distortions, and outright lies about me, SIOA, and Pamela Geller. CAIR has a long record of duplicity and deception. Although it has received millions of dollars in donations from foreign Islamic entities, it has not registered as a foreign agent as required by the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), despite spreading Islamic supremacist propaganda within the United States. Although it presents itself as a civil rights group, CAIR actually has numerous links to Islamic supremacist and jihad groups. CAIR founders Omar Ahmad and Niwad Awad (who still serves as CAIR's executive director) were present at a Hamas planning meeting in Philadelphia in 1993 where they and other Hamas operatives conspired to raise funds for Hamas and to promote jihad in the Middle East. CAIR has steadfastly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror: * Ghassan Elashi, founder of CAIR's Texas chapter, in 2009 received a 65-year prison sentence for funneling over $12 million from the Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation to the jihad terrorist group Hamas, which is responsible for murdering hundreds of Israeli civilians
In 1998 Omar Ahmad, CAIR's co-founder and longtime Board Chairman, said: "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth." After he received unwelcome publicity as a result of this statement, Ahmad denied saying it, several years after the fact. However, the original reporter, Lisa Gardiner of the Fremont Argus, stands by her story. CAIR's spokesman Ibrahim Hooper once said: "I wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future." So I asked Smith why he didn't tell his readers any of this. He responded by saying that he already had told his readers about CAIR, just yesterday, in fact -- and directed me to this piece, which, as you'll see, says nothing about CAIR's Hamas ties or anything else, but instead actually touts CAIR, weirdly, as an "alternative" to Hamas. Smith explained in an email to me: "I understand that you're asking me why I didn't restate the entire case against CAIR, and their response, your response to them, and so on, in my blog item. This is a complaint of a form I get five or ten times a day. I write a blog, and mostly take little bites of stories. I was writing a small item about your appearance -- and your prominence around the mosque issue, and your stance toward obama [sic], make that of modest interest to me, and to readers in general I think, beyond the context of CAIR's complaint -- to speak to the FBI. There are a lot of things I don't write every day, and the history and controversies around CAIR were, indeed, among them." Every day, or any day. Par for the course for the mainstream media. Posted by Pamela Geller on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 11:14 AM in CAIR: JIHAD IN AMERICA 2010 | Permalink | Comments (2) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! September 1, a grim, terrible anniversary in Beslan, Russia. On the first day of school, Muslim terrorists stormed a school, took everyone hostage and eventually committed one of the most grotesque and unspeakable crimes (even for jihad) in recent history. MOSCOW. (Maxim Krans, RIA Novosti political commentator) - On September 1, 2004, The North Caucasus town of Beslan became know to the world for a tragic reason. A terrorist group took hostage 1,128 people who gathered at a local school on that day; two days later, 319 hostages including 187 children were killed in the storming of the building. Hundreds of schoolchildren and their relatives were injured. Raping for Allah at Beslan: Sexual Terror: The Untold Stories of Beslan Jihad TheOpinionator November 19 2008
From the days of Prophet Muhammad, sexual terror has been an integral part of Islamic Jihad. The siege of the Beslan School by Islamic Jihadis in 2004 was no exception as reveals Dr. Schurman-Kauflin. -- Editor, MA Khan Excerpt from Chapter 1, “Disturbed: Terrorist Behavioral Profiles” (2008) On September 1, 2004, terrorists stormed a school in Beslan, Russia, and perpetrated one of the most heinous terror attacks in history. Though many people may have heard of this attack, it is very likely that most do not know what really happened there. The reality is so dark that few dare speak of what went on. There are predators in wait lurking everywhere searching for unsuspecting victims. If a person has a proclivity or a secret desire, that inclination can easily come out if an opportunity arises. And that is what happened at Beslan. The terrorists immediately killed the men because they wanted no resistance for their plans. Then, when they saw the helpless girls in front of them, the temptation became too much. Their perverse dreams came true. Beslan was clearly a sexual homicide/sexual suicide. That is, the offenders wanted more than simple terrorism. Some of the terrorists at Beslan were hired guns who did not plan on dying that day. They had not thought things through and did not realize that the Russians would not let them out alive.
Things had deteriorated when the media reported that there were only 354 victims. Wanting to have a dramatic impact, the terrorists exploded with anger. There were 1200 victims, and the Russians were trying to down play the incident. The terrorists said they would have to eliminate victims to fit with what the media had reported. Their demeanor worsened, and they got really mean. It was then that they began raping the girls. They wanted sex as they killed, and this is sexual homicide. A sex killer gets excited when he thinks about forcing himself inside an unwilling victim, but the rape itself does not produce the ultimate excitement. It is the rape followed by the killing that is arousing. This is what happened at Beslan. One by one, females were targeted. The sex killers looked for the perfect victims, and after zeroing in, they grabbed and disrobed the little girls in the middle of the gym. There were muffled cries as the girls were humiliated in front of everyone. They were stripped, raped, and sodomized by several men. Not content to simply rape, the terrorists used their guns and other objects to penetrate the screaming victims while the other hostages were forced to watch. And the terrorists laughed. They laughed as they violated the children and made them bleed. What few people know is that some of the girls died as a result of being raped with objects. The internal damage was so severe that without immediate medical attention, the girls bled to death. Those who managed to survive required extensive reconstructive surgery and painful recoveries. But raping the girls was not enough for the deviants who had entered the school. The terrorists beat the other children. In fact, beatings took place regularly, and as they pummeled the little ones, the terrorists smiled and laughed. It was said that they would strike a child and then watch the child cringe. When the youngsters recoiled, their captors laughed. This says the offenders enjoyed inflicting the suffering. They wanted their victims to suffer. Such behavior is sadistic. Bringing others pain brings the sadist pleasure. And the terrorists tortured the victims in many ways. Along with causing paralyzing fear, the terrorists had an ally in the weather. It was extremely hot outside, but the school had no working air conditioner. As the heat raged, the hostages begged for water, and at first, some was given. Time crept on, and the terrorists became increasingly cruel. They drank in front of the hostages and mocked the children who were crying out for water. Things got so bad that the victims were forced to drink their own urine. In some cases, the hostages poured urine over one another in a feeble attempt to keep cool. Seeing the suffering enhanced the joy of the perpetrators. In a twisted, ghoulish game, the terrorists put water in front of the children who were desperately thirsty and told them if they reached for the water, they would be killed. Still, this horror wasn’t enough for the hostage takers. Raping, beating, torturing, and mocking were just not evil enough. Thus, to further frighten the victims, one terrorist stated “we came here to die.” Russian Tagirovich Khuchbarov was called the “colonel.” When the children asked for water or to use the restroom, he simply stated “I’m not your uncle, I’m a terrorist … I came here to kill." Up until this point, the hostages most likely believed they could survive, but then…hearing these words…it meant they were to die too. This surely would have made the victims scream in their minds. If they cried out loud, they risked being beaten or shot. As a crowd gathered outside the school, several terrorists goaded the townspeople. It was said that they “took delight” in egging the crowd on. They fired shots. They taunted. And again, they laughed. This psychopathic, sadistic behavior continued into the night as they ordered hostages to throw naked dead bodies out to the west yard. Continue reading "Six Year Horrible Anniversary: Beslan Jihad" » Posted by Pamela Geller on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 02:50 AM in Global Jihad 2010 | Permalink | Comments (53) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! In recent weeks, the Muslim Brotherhood front, Hamas funder and unindicted co-conspirator CAIR has been given ongoing nationwide exposure. They have taken to the airwaves accusing me of leading a crusade against Muslims, which is patently untrue. Both Saturday and Sunday nights, this past weekend, Geraldo Rivera had on the vile Zead Ramadan of CAIR, who, yet again, made wild accusations as an incitement to violence against those who oppose the Islamic supremacist Ground Zero mosque and the sharia in America.Laura Ingraham, Bill O'Reilly, MSNBC, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann and others have allowed these stealth jihadists to go on the air and gin up the jihadists by publicly accusing us of "leading the opposition to the Ground Zero mosque" -- which has resulted in a spike in death threats to me and my family. These same media outlets (Geraldo, Matthews, Ingraham, O'Reilly, etc.) have not given me (or Spencer) the opportunity to defend ourselves and state our case against the lying jihadists, but have allowed these lies to stand unchallenged by enemies of the state.
I oppose the Muslim Brotherhood, their proxies, and Islamic supremacists like CAIR, ISNA, ICNA, MAS, and MPAC, who are actively working to subvert the constitution and, as it is put in a Brotherhood internal captured document, work toward "eliminating and destroying western civilization from within" -- with millions contributed by the Saudis and the State department. Why mainstream media would host these avowed enemies of the state is beyond reason. It is now a steady stream of threats, intimidation and violent screeds. I must increase my security. It is costly. I need your help. Badly. Please contribute something (anything!) to help me defray the costs of the new and significant expense. There is no money in what we do. Neither I nor SIOA or FDI has benefactors, donors, etc. We operate on a tattered shoestring budget, but we get it done. We use every dime that good people send to buy buses (1oK a city), taxi tops (10K a city), stage rallies, etc. We need real money to stage the 911 rally against the Ground Zero mosque. If you wish your contribution to go a specific issue (ie Ground Zero rally, bus campaign, security...), just specify. The Ground Zero rally on September 11th is going to need your help. The security costs for the rally will be enormous. If you want to contribute to that specifically, go here: Stand with us on September 11. Help me keep myself and family safe. I can't run certain threats for obvious reasons, but here's a typical sampling. Subscribe! August 28, 2010 This is my third e-mail attachment to your attention, before the attacks of September 11, 2010, against "White" females and "gay" people. Zionist is behind the homosexual movement, and the 9/11 attacks. Yes, President Obama is Muslim, and the Muslim Brotherhood is behind him 120 %. As I stated to you witch, we have America and her cities lock down, and some of us are ready for Jihad. I am as of this day a sucide bomber. _________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ You are are a raceist fearmonger and someone should punch you on that
_______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Posted by Pamela Geller on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 12:40 AM | Permalink | Comments (116) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! Why were these aspiring jihadis let on the plane when their luggage contained "mock bombs?" They were obviously trying to raise as many red flags as possible. This raises many questions. (Thanks to Joe) Two men taken off a Chicago-to-Amsterdam United Airlines flight in the Netherlands have been charged by Dutch police with "preparation of a terrorist attack," U.S. law enforcement officials tell ABC News. U.S. officials said the two appeared to be travelling with what were termed "mock bombs" in their luggage. "This was almost certainly a dry run, a test," said one senior law enforcement official. A spokesman for the Dutch public prosecutor, Ernst Koelman, confirmed the two men were arrested this morning and said "the investigation is ongoing." He said the arrests were made "at the request of American authorities." The two were allowed to board the flight at O'Hare airport last night despite security concerns surrounding one of them, the officials said. The men were identified as Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi, of Detroit, MI, and Hezem al Murisi, the officials said. A neighbor of al Soofi told ABC News he is from Yemen. Airport security screeners in Birmingham, Alabama first stopped al Soofi and referred him to additional screening because of what officials said was his "bulky clothing." In addition, officials said, al Soofi was found to be carrying $7,000 in cash and a check of his luggage found a cell phone taped to a Pepto-Bismol bottle, three cell phones taped together, several watches taped together, a box cutter and three large knives. Officials said there was no indication of explosives and he and his luggage were cleared for the flight from Birmingham to Chicago O'Hare. Instead, officials say, al Soofi was joined by the second man, Al Murisi, and boarded the United flight from Chicago to Amsterdam. When Customs and Border officials learned al Soofi was not on the flight from Dulles to Dubai, the plane was ordered to return to the gate so his luggage could be removed. Officials said additional screening found no evidence of explosives. The two men were detained by Dutch authorities when the United flight landed in Amsterdam, according to the officials. Posted by Pamela Geller on Monday, August 30, 2010 at 08:33 PM in Jihad in America: Enemy in our Midst | Permalink | Comments (22) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! If you are channel surfing tonight and can't listen to Bill bloviate, go on over to Eric Bolling's Money Rocks. I am debating the Ground Zero mosque issue with, among others, that schmuck Bob Beckel. If he calls me "that woman" one more time ............. Enjoy! Posted by Pamela Geller on Monday, August 30, 2010 at 07:53 PM in Atlas TV | Permalink | Comments (8) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! Photo: Feisal Rauf in Qatar this past weekend on a tour of the Middle East paid for by Obama's State Department - your taxpayer dollars at work. Out from under the rock crawls rats and roaches ..... Worse still, Ground Zero Imam Rauf snagged more than $2 million in public financing to renovate low-income apartments. He took the money and forced good people to live with vermin and dilapidation. Imam Feisal A. Rauf won support for his Hudson County projects from powerful politicians, among them Robert C. Janiszewski, the disgraced former county executive. He also was awarded grants from Union City when U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez was mayor.(NJ Record) You have to admit, these conmen know how to scam the system. Now they are talking about getting 70 million to build a stab in the eye at Ground Zero. It's no wonder they have such contempt for us. Is Gloomberg still kissing Khan's keyster? Page after page of municipal health records examined by The Record show repeated complaints ranging from failure to pick up garbage, to rat and bedbug infestations and no heat and hot water. MOSQUE SLUMLORD NY Post He's the religious leader of the planned, controversial Ground Zero mosque -- but across the Hudson, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is known as an alleged slumlord.(more here) At buildings in Union City and Palisades Park, where Rauf reportedly got tax dollars to renovate low-income apartments, tenants yesterday said their gripes about their lousy housing conditions have been ignored. "Why doesn't he help the tenants he has before he builds a new place, claiming he wants to help people?" said a disgusted Jamie Barillas, who lives in a Rauf-owned apartment at 2206 Central Ave. in Union City. "Nothing gets done. We have to go through City Hall to get things done. . . . He doesn't care about his tenants," she said. Barillas said that bedbugs plague the building -- but that when she tried to get building managers to respond, they claimed they didn't have the money to hire an exterminator. Tenant Vilma Then chided Rauf as greedy. "All he likes is money," she said. "Nothing ever gets fixed. I complain to the super, and all he says is that he has the same problem." Vilma Then said she lived at Rauf's building around the corner until a fire forced her to move to 2206 Central Ave. She said her current situation is similar to her old digs, where she had a stove that was more like "a roach den." She also complained that Rauf's wife, Daisy Khan -- who has been the imam's spokesperson while he is touring overseas -- "listens to what you have to say and writes things down and leaves -- and nothing gets done." "She gives nothing but false promises," the resident said. [...] The projects were plagued by financial problems as well as tenant complaints, the paper said. Khan did not immediately return calls to her home or workplace. She had told The Record that all of the tenants' complaints had been addressed. Francisco Nuñez, 46, who lives in one of the imam's Union City apartment houses, told The Post that Rauf "needs to pay more attention to this building because human beings live here -- we're not living here for free." "We pay rent, which is the only time people come around -- to collect money." Posted by Pamela Geller on Monday, August 30, 2010 at 12:23 PM in Mosque at Ground Zero: Takbir! | Permalink | Comments (34) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
This is getting ridiculous. Yes, let's put all of our national defense on this little porky toy. 10 to 1 odds, CAIR put it there. Here are the CAIR shrieking harpies' email blast. Man, they are are all for eliminating the Jewish state, but porky pig pranks, fuggedoubouddit. Note to CAIR: you look like friggin idiots. CAIR: 'No Mosque in NYC' Pig Left at Calif. Islamic Center
(SACRAMENTO, CA, 8/29/10) -- The Sacramento Valley chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-SV) today called on law enforcement authorities to initiate a hate crime investigation of an incident in which a mock pig inscribed with "No Mosque in NYC" was left at a California Islamic center. CAIR-SV said the pig, which was left earlier this month in the mailbox of the mosque, was also inscribed with "Remember 9-11" and "MO HAM MED the Pig." SEE: Images of Mock Pig Left at Calif. Mosque
[NOTE: Islam prohibits the consumption of pork products and anti-Muslim bigots often use a pig theme as a way to cause maximum insult. Representatives of the local Muslim community have contacted law enforcement authorities, but have asked that the name of the facility not be made public due to security concerns.] "This incident is a further symptom of the growing anti-Muslim bigotry nationwide sparked by the hysterical smear campaign targeting the planned Islamic community center in Manhattan," said CAIR-SV Executive Director Basim Elkarra. "We again ask mainstream religious and political leaders to speak out against such un-American intolerance." Posted by Pamela Geller on Monday, August 30, 2010 at 11:38 AM | Permalink | Comments (25) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! America is under attack from within at the highest levels of power. Barack Hussein Obama’s policies are bringing America to her knees. With a consistency that can only come from deeply held conviction, Barack Hussein Obama is damaging the office of the presidency and compromising American sovereignty. As soon as he became president, he took decisive steps to submit American sovereignty to the will of international bodies. First Obama attacked America by suing Arizona for passing a law that merely reflected federal immigration law. Now the Obama administration has included the Arizona state immigration law in a report of human rights abuses to the UN, that collective negation of humanity and home to the worst human rights abusers in the world.
Obama is an internationalist, and this has more ominous implications for American sovereignty. “What transnationalism, at bottom, is all about,s depriving American citizens of their powers of representative government by selectively imposing on them the favored policies of Europe's leftist elites.” In contrast, “proponents of a nationalist jurisprudence view ‘foreign legal precedents’ as ‘an impermissible imposition on the exercise of American sovereignty.’” legal expert M. Edward Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, the former general counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, former principal deputy assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice Obama's latest attack on America may shock Americans, but readers of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America nod their heads in recognition. It's all in my book, the relinquishing of American sovereignty and Obama's internationalism. Americans can’t say they hadn’t been warned. They should have noticed that the charismatic young Democratic presidential candidate had numerous socialist associations, going back to a childhood spent among internationalists. And even as recently as a nine months before he was elected president, he sponsored a bill in the Senate that would compromise American sovereignty (the Global Poverty Act.) Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer demanded Friday that a reference to the state's controversial immigration law be removed from a State Department report to the United Nations' human rights commissioner. Posted by Pamela Geller on Monday, August 30, 2010 at 10:56 AM in Relinguishing our Sovereignty to Islamicized UN | Permalink | Comments (35) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! Actually, I consider Atlas more like "LOVEWATCH! Keeping the world safe for lovers and other strangers." More lying from the Islamist tools who whore themselves out to Islamic supremacists and oppressors. The Southern Poverty Law Center has kicked off its Goebbels-like propaganda campaign against me here. I equate the Southern Poverty Law Center coming out for Islamic supremacists with them coming out for nazis. What's the difference, and why doesn't the SPLC even have a category for Islamic jihadi groups? Not one. The greatest threat facing our nation, our people, our world, and they are shilling for them. Now they are linking me with "White Supremacists" (defamation of character). Their piece is awful. This is an obvious ploy to keep politicians away from our September 11 rally against the Ground Zero mega-mosque and any jihad-related issue. Trust me, the folks at Stormfront, whom I've monitored for years (they were the very first hate site to hit the web back in 1994), can't stand Jews or Israel or me, and it would be obvious to ANYONE that IF there are posts there supporting my work, then this is a manifestation of Sun Tzu's strategy from the Art of War (deliberately planting misinformation from the 'other side'). White supremacists and neo-Nazis actually hate Jews and Israel, and love Islam and jihad. The idea of neo-Nazis who love Israel and hate Islamic jihad is a figment of the left's imagination. Further I have never supported Eugene TerreBlanche, but I have railed against the Boer genocide in South Africa. Is the SLPC advocating for genocide now? Here is everything I wrote on South Africa, and here is a piece I penned from American Thinker, Genocide in South Africa. And it's same thing with Milosevic. I have never supported him in any way, shape or form. It is the Serbs I stand with as they stand against the jihadists in the Balkans. Here are all my posts on the Balkans. Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself. Of course, Hamas funder, Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR has sent out an alert with this vile garbage. The irony is that if SPLC were tracking real "hate groups," CAIR should be on its list. That's the Orwellian world in which we live. A little while back, a reader write that he saw that the Southern Poverty Law Center had FDI/ SIOA in its crosshairs. He thought we should see this brief correspondence he had a year ago with Mark Potok here. Reader Bob wrote, "I started out by looking on their website for a definition of the term 'hate group' fully expecting that Islam would fit any reasonable definition. When I couldn't find such a definition (still can't today) I inquired per below."
Check this out: ---------------Message--------------- Sent 2009-6-11
I was looking on your site for a definition of the term "hate group" and how it is determined which groups qualify. I was not able to find that. Can you please point me to that or else just respond back with the definition you use? Thank you. Bill ________________________________________-- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:27:43 -0500
Bob, Here's what our Intelligence Project director wrote about this:
---------- Hope this explains it for you. Penny Weaver
PS - backup for the citations listed and many others are available on request. _________________________________________________________________ On 6/16/09 11:07 AM, Bob wrote:
Thanks, ______________________________________________________________ On 6/16/09 2:46 PM, "Penny Weaver" <Penny.Weaver@splcenter.org> wrote:
Penny _____________________________________________________________
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:48:00 -0500 Posted by Pamela Geller on Sunday, August 29, 2010 at 05:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (86) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! Rubbing our faces in the most heinous Islamic attack isn't enough. Now, anyone who dares to be hurt or insulted or offended by a 15 story Ground Zero mega mosque is branded a "racist." And they lie about everything. It's rich: 250 people attended their rally on the 25th -- uh, more like 50. But you can count on the media to lie for them, just as CBS turned Beck's half a million patriots into 87,000. Whatever.
Check out this latest Lefty/Islamic "initiative." I strongly recommend all readers attend Posted by Pamela Geller on Sunday, August 29, 2010 at 04:21 PM | Permalink | Comments (52) ShareThis Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! Posted by Pamela Geller on Sunday, August 29, 2010 at 02:57 PM in Mosque at Ground Zero: Takbir! | Permalink | Comments (33) ShareThis
FOX BUSINESS, MONEY ROCKS: PAMELA GELLER DEBATES GROUND ZERO ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST MEGA MOSQUE
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
MUSLIM TERRORISTS SLAUGHTER FOUR JEWISH CIVILIANS IN COLD BLOOD - BODIES RIDDLED WITH BULLETS
NEWSWEEK ON THE EDL
U.S. SOLDIER: "I CAN'T DEPLOY AND BE A MUSLIM"
![[object Object]](http://memri.convio.net/images/content/pagebuilder/11747.jpg)
"This Muslim Soldier is Refusing to be Sent with His Unit because … as a Muslim He is Forbidden to Kill Muslims"
"Army sources Told Al-Jazeera TV that the Serviceman Nasser would Not be Sent to Afghanistan within the Next Few Days"
ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM: MOTHER IS DENIED PILL BY MUSLIM PHARMACIST, "I APPRECIATE WE LIVE IN A MULTI-CULTURAL SOCIETY BUT WHAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE HIS BELIEFS ONTO ME?"
FBI REFUSES TO CAVE TO CRIMINAL, HAMAS-LINKED, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD PROXY, CAIR
STANDS BY SPENCERThe FBI is defending its invitation to a prominent critic of Islam in America, who is also one of the leaders of the fight to stop a downtown Manhattan mosque and Islamic Center.
"Our nation's law enforcement personnel should not receive training from the head of a hate group that seeks to demonize Islam and to prevent American Muslims from exercising their rights as citizens," said CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, who also noted that Spencer and blogger Pamela Geller recently published a book subtitled, "The Obama Administration's War on America."
* Mousa Abu Marzook, a former CAIR official, was in 1995 designated by the U.S. government in 1995 as a "terrorist and Hamas leader." He now is a Hamas leader in Syria.
* Randall Royer, CAIR's former civil rights coordinator, in 2004 began serving a 20-year prison sentence for aiding al-Qaida and the Taliban against American troops in Afghanistan and recruiting for Lashkar e-Taiba, the jihadist group responsible for the 2008 Mumbai jihad massacres.
* Bassem Khafagi, CAIR's former community relations director, was arrested for involvement with the Islamic Assembly of North America, which was linked to al-Qaida. After pleading guilty to visa and bank fraud charges, Khafagi was deported.
* Rabih Haddad, a former CAIR fundraiser, was deported for his work with the Global Relief Foundation (which he co-founded), a terror-financing organization.SIX YEAR HORRIBLE ANNIVERSARY: BESLAN JIHAD
By Deborah Schurman-Kauflin
Then, once they were inside, and the realization dawned on them, plans changed.DEATH THREATS AND SECURITY
Subject: Fw: 9/11 Families Date: 8/29/2010 5:24:28 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time From: baxterthomas@yahoo.com
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Sent from my iPhone which is monopolized by AT&T which sucks. "Taxi driver stabbed after passenger asks if he's Muslim"
This is your fault. You are a racist evil cunt.
Subject: You Date: 8/28/2010 10:28:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time From: richybruce@gmail.com
ugly plastic surgery face to shit you up.
Have a nice day bitch.YOU LYING SACK OF SHIT CUNT FOR REINFORCING THE PERCEPTION OF AMERICA AS A TERRORIST NATION BY YOUR FUCKING LIES ABOUT THE "GROUND ZERO MOSQUE." YOU ARE THE BIGGEST ASSHOLE I HAVE SEEN AT WORK IN A LONG TIME. ARE YOU PROUD OF YOURSELF????? YOUR ACTIONS HAVE PUT OUR TROOPS ABROAD IN MORE DANGER AND OUR CIVILIAN POPULATION AS WELL -- ONCE THEY READ WHAT YOU SAY AND THE SHITSTORM YOU CREATED, THEY WILL ADD MORE FUEL TO THE FIRE IN THEIR WAR AGAINST AMERICA.
Subject: Kill Yourself. Date: 8/20/2010
From: maciejtt@gmail.com
Sent from the Internet(Details) Monday, August 30, 2010
TWO MUSLIMS ON UNITED FLIGHT FROM CHICAGO ARRESTED ON 'PREPARATION OF A TERRORIST ATTACK' IN AMSTERDAM
ATLAS TV: GELLER ON MONEY ROCKS, FOX BUSINESS TONIGHT
EXTREMIST GROUND ZERO MOSQUE IMAM RAUF IS A RAT AND ROACH SLUMLORD
SHRIEKING CAIR HARPIES -- DUST PORKY FOR PRINTS!
This little piggy went to market, this little piggy went home, and this little piggy played mischief with CAIR!......................
Muslim civil rights group asks that incident be investigated as hate crime
http://www.cair.com/Portals/0/IMG00124.jpg
http://www.cair.com/Portals/0/IMG00127.jpgOBAMA'S STATE DEPARTMENT REPORTS ARIZONA TO UN AS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSER
The U.S. included its legal challenge to the law on a list of ways the federal government is protecting human rights.
In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Brewer says it is "downright offensive" that a state law would be included in the report, which was drafted as part of a UN review of human rights in all member nations every four years.
"The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to 'review' by theUnited Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional," Brewer wrote.
Arizona's law generally requires police officer enforcing other laws to investigate the immigration status of people they suspect are illegal immigrants.
Sunday, August 29, 2010
SPLC REDEFINES "HATE": ISLAMIC JIHADISTS GOOD, PAMMIECAKES BAD
MARK POTOK, SLPC: "WITH REGARD TO MONITORING RADICAL JIHADISTS, WE HAVE MADE A PRAGMATIC DECISION TO LEAVE THAT MAINLY TO" OTHERS
Subject: Comment on the Center's Work
Subject: Re: Comment on the Center's Work
From: Penny.Weaver@splcenter.org
Probably the great majority of groups we list have not been associated with > hate crimes. In any event, hate crimes are generally committed by individual > members of groups, as opposed to the group itself.
Southern Poverty Law Center
400 Washington Ave.
Montgomery, Alabama 36104
www.splcenter.org
334/956-820
From: Bob
To: penny.weaver@splcenter.org
Subject: RE: Comment on the Center's Work
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:30:05 -0600
Hi Penny - Thank you for your prompt response. Let me cut to the chase as for my reason for asking, since your description of hate groups is in line with what I thought it would be and should be (and with which I completely agree).
Obviously neo-Nazi groups fit the definition, but Nazism itself might not, simply because it is an ideology, and not a group. It is a "hate-filled ideology" which, if adopted by an individual or group would qualify that person or group as "haters." So far so good?
I have become aware of an ideology which seems to obsess over Jews (but not so much blacks or other racial or ethnic minorities, unusual though that may be), with leaders who refer to Jews as "swine" "depraved" "merciless and heartless" wishing "evil" for others, "feel[ing] pain to see others in happiness and are gleeful when others are afflicted with a calamity" etc.
Its literature insists that Jews are "swine" "corrupt" and "corruptors" "ignomous" and "doomed in the Hereafter" etc. People who subscribe to this ideology are, as far as I can tell, united in these feelings (and worse, much worse) towards Jews, but sometimes, depending on the time and place, are PC enough to keep that under wraps while in public and just vent against "Israel and Zionism, but not the Jews personally."
I am not trying to be cute here, but this ideology, in case you hadn't already guessed, is Islam. The comments in its literature (the Koran of course, but also the words and actions of Muhammad, whose example is considered sacred without exception) and by its leaders (mullahs, sheiks, and ayatollahs) are all but impossible to distinguish from the sentiments expressed by Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler, Heydrich, Streicher, etc. As best I can tell, Islam fits any reasonable definition of a "hate-filled ideology." As far as I can tell, it easily meets the straight-up definition you gave me. So while I see that the "Nation of Islam" is prominently featured on your site as a hate group (I should note, for other reasons than what I cite above) do subscribers to Islam in general also qualify as "haters" or not? If not, on what basis? If so, are they listed on the site?
I realize that because Islam cloaks itself in the veneer of religion and has a lot of adherents who consistently prove their willingness to resort to any and every form of threat, thuggery and blood-curdling violence (hate-group characteristics if ever there were any), it seems to have succeeded in quelling any thought of calling it out for what it is: a hate-filled, deeply antisemitic ideology disguised as an uplifting religion. Am I wrong on this? I would appreciate your thoughts.
Regards,
Bob
Hi Penny - I was wondering if you had had a chance to think about my question. If there is someone else at SPLC who you think might be better positioned to respond, by all means please forward it.
I forwarded your original e-mail to Mark Potok, director of our Intelligence Project, but he has been incredibly busy with the aftermath of the Holocaust Museum shooting and probably hasn’t had a chance to read your message.
From: mark.potok@splcenter.org
Bob,
Thanks for the note. I think one could make similar arguments for lots of religions, and that’s not a road I think we should go down. After all, the Old Testament calls for stoning to death adultresses (but not adulterers), homosexuals and others.
With regard to monitoring radical jihadists, we have made a pragmatic decision to leave that mainly to the major Jewish NGOs, which do a good job and have some real expertise that would likely take us years to develop. Still, we do cover black Muslim extremists and have written about such matters as the connections between radical Muslims and neo-Nazis.
Best,
Mark Potok
COALITION TO STOP INFIDELPHOBIA IN AMERICA
Created By More Info
[...]
For us to be effective in our struggle for justice we need to build a movement that makes a stand that Park51 should not be moved and can de mand that our Muslim communities be able to build mosques without the fear of being singled out and attacked. We urge you to participate, to organize future actions, and plan for stopping the cancerous growth of the movement against our Muslim and Arab communities.See MoreBAD FAITH AT GROUND ZERO
Tuesday, 31 August 2010
Posted by
Britannia Radio
at
20:28
















