Sunday, August 15, 2010
Legitimate Questions for the President
Mr. President, should they or should they not build a mosque steps away from where radical Islamists killed 3000 people? Please tell us your position. We all know that they have the right to do it, but should they? And, no, this is not above your pay grade. If those who wish to build this Ground Zero mosque are sincerely interested in encouraging positive "cross-cultural engagement" and dialogue to show a moderate and tolerant face of Islam, then why haven't they recognized that the decision to build a mosque at this particular location is doing just the opposite? Mr. President, why aren't you encouraging the mosque developers to accept Governor Paterson's generous offer of assistance in finding a new location for the mosque on state land if they move it away from Ground Zero? Why haven't they jumped at this offer? Why are they apparently so set on building a mosque steps from what you have described, in agreement with me, as "hallowed ground"? I believe these are legitimate questions to ask.Will Sharia-Backing Obama Speak Out for Sakineh?
As Islamonazi Iran and Al Qaeda Plot and Plan America's Doom, Imagine if an Obama-Like Appeaser Was in the White House Before WW II
A truly great President warns Americans of the consequences of an Axis victory--before Pearl Harbor--and the fifth column threat, referred to as "undiluted poison."Obama's Backing for Ground Zero Victory Mosque Makes Gingrich's Call for Sharia Ban More Urgent
JEWS FLEEING EUROPEAN CITIES IN RECORD NUMBERS BECAUSE OF MUSLIM PERSECUTION
History Repeating Itself: Obama's Betrayal of Israel Recalls Chamberlain's Surrender of Czechoslovakia
Analysis: Obama's Secret War in Context
Barack Obama has escalated and expanded America's secret war against Al Qaeda, according to an enterprising article in today's edition of The New York Times. Click here to read the in-depth piece, which reports on intensified American assaults using drones, special operations units, and contractors.
At first glance, the widening, covert conflict seems to contradict Obama's policy of appeasing radical Islam at home and abroad. In fact, the laser-like focus on Al Qaeda is part of a broader American strategy that relies on appeasing--and actually aligning with--right-wing political Islam, or Islamism.
Obama, America's first Muslim-born President, according to Islamic law, which traces religion through the father, is in fierce competition with Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin-Laden and his henchmen for leadership of "the Muslim world." Hence, Obama's double game: make every effort possible to crush Al Qaeda and its affiliates while at the same time accommodating and seeking to engage the rest of radical Islam.
Talk about a Grand Bargain--with the devil. Imagine if FDR had sought to redefine and narrow the war against Nazism to the goal of only defeating the SS, while trying desperately to "engage" the rest of the Nazi regime and war machine. That basically describes what Obama is up to--with the support of an unholy, three-way alliance comprised of liberal idiots of appeasement, greedy globalizers, and aging and up-and-coming geopolitical strategists (all fundamentally opposed to Israel's existence) who still believe that it is possible to collaborate with the devil without ending up in hell. Nearly nine full years after 9/11, incredibly, the Brzezinskis of this world are again bent on using Islam as both a tool to advance American interests, especially in the energy sphere, and a sword to counter China's rise and Russia's resurgence. Obama is their Jimmy Carter; more than that, Obama is ... their Muslim.
Beijing and Moscow understand this game all too well, which helps to explain their cynical (and stupid) support for nuclear-arming Iran and its partner in proliferation, nuclear-armed North Korea.
No wonder wealthy Europeans are buying gold. The notion of an out-of-control dynamic leading to a full-fledged, third world war no longer seems nutty or far-fetched.NORTH KOREA THREATENS 'MERCILESS' RESPONSE TO US-SOUTH KOREAN MILITARY MANEUVERS
AP is reporting--click here for the story--that North Korea today threatened a "merciless" response, "the severest punishment no one has ever met in this world," to massive U.S.-South Korean military maneuvers planned for this week.
Forget the North's notoriously bad grammar. The meaning is clear; and the Stalinist/Kimist regime means to make good on its threat, according to China Confidential analysts.
A new Korean conflict is not only possible but increasingly likely.
Monday, 16 August 2010
By Sarah Palin
Archival videos worth watching over and again....
What's happening in Europe has ominous implications for the future of religious freedom in the United States, reports Daniel Greenfield. Click here for his analysis.
Posts
