Tuesday, 17 August 2010


TAX BENEFITS??????


BY DONATIONS?????



Figures reveal Blair's charity empire

The former prime minister is attracting wealthy donors to back his health and harmony projects


Charities are going to the wall, leading philanthropists are cutting back and patrons of the arts are closing their wallets. But in these financially straitened times, Tony and Cherie Blair are emerging as the UK's answer to Bill and Melinda Gates.

Documents filed at Companies House show the former prime minister and his wife have been busy establishing a series of charities that have global reach and expansive ambitions. Many politicians decide to set up charitable organisations after they leave office, but the Blairs' ambitions are different in that their scale dwarfs those of their British predecessors.

Everything from striving for the promotion of women entrepreneurs to encouraging healthy Geordies, eradicating fatal illnesses and bringing lasting peace to the Middle East are to receive the Blairs' philanthropic touch.

And while many charities are having trouble raising funds, not to mention attracting the suitably connected personnel necessary to achieve their goals, the Blairs are encountering no such problems. The names of those lending support to their charitable trusts read like a Who's Who of movers and shakers from sport, religion and philanthropy.

"The Blairs are using all their resources to tackle things they care about," said Sue Wixley of New Philanthropy Capital, a think tank that connects charities to donors. "In this case, the Blairs' resources are their contacts."

The potent mix is already paying handsome dividends. Recently filed accounts for theTony Blair Faith Foundation reveal that the charity, which aims to promote greater understanding between religions, received donations of £3.6m in its first year of existence.

It is an impressive amount for an organisation that was established less than two years ago, although the accounts do not reveal who donated the money. However, there is speculation that some of the money flooding into the foundation is coming from wealthy benefactors in the Middle East. The accounts reveal that £550,000 has been ring-fenced for promoting the foundation's work with the Islamic, Christian and Jewish faiths.

Run by Ruth Turner, Blair's former director of government relations, the foundation has a number of key aims, according to its accounts. One is to help faith groups play their part in eradicating malaria, chiefly by encouraging mosques and churches to run training courses to spread health messages. On a domestic front, the foundation is aiming to improve religious literacy among young people through the production of "high-quality educational resources" that will be distributed in UK schools.

Intriguingly, the foundation's accounts reveal it has plans to broaden its franchise and establish the Tony Blair Faith Foundation - USA. Given Blair's popularity across the Atlantic, thanks to his support for "the war on terror", it may seem a logical progression. Indeed, the original UK foundation's accounts reveal it is already supporting a course at Yale University "to deepen understanding of the links between religion, politics and economics in the 21st century".

Blair's global ambitions for his faith foundation are also helped by the choice of advisers who sit on its council. These include the Rev David Coffey, president of the powerful Baptist World Alliance, a global network of church groups; the Chief Rabbi, Jonathan Sacks; and Mustafa Ceric, the Grand Mufti of Bosnia-Herzegovina, who has won awards for promoting inter-faith harmony and is widely respected by Jews and Muslims alike.

But perhaps the biggest name on Blair's advisory board is the Rev Rick Warren, founder of the Saddleback Church in the US and one of the country's highest-profile evangelists. Warren's reputation - and influence - was highlighted earlier this month when Barack Obama invited him to deliver the traditional religious invocation at his inauguration, a move that drew protests from liberals who disagree with his conservative views on same-sex marriage and abortion.

In addition to the faith foundation, Blair has also launched the Tony Blair Sports Foundation. Its mission statement is to "invest in local people, inspiring them to make the most of themselves through sport".

Accounts at Companies House also show Blair has established the Tony Blair Governance Initiative. The aims of the charity, set up last December, are "to relieve poverty and ... promote social and economic development" through the administration of good governance. Last month Blair implemented the first steps of this strategy when he became an unpaid adviser to Rwanda's President Kagame. This is in addition to his role as Middle East envoy on behalf of the UN, the US, the EU and Russia.

Meanwhile, not to be outdone, Mrs Blair has established her own eponymous trust. The first accounts of the Cherie Blair Foundation for Women, filed earlier this month, reveal it is attempting to break down the economic barriers facing women by using new technology.

The fledgling foundation aims to build partnerships with mobile phone companies in Africa to help connect women entrepreneurs and to partner microfinance institutions in pilot countries in the Middle East. The accounts show one of its trustees is the well-connected London-based socialite Sara Carello. The Blairs may have been inspired by Microsoft founder Bill Gates who, along with his wife, Melinda, helps preside over a foundation with an endowment worth more than $35bn and whose aims are to alleviate poverty and disease through the use of new technologies.


Blair’s ‘blood money’: how much is he really giving?

Tony Blair

The British Legion welcomes Tony Blair’s donation - but what does it amount to?

LAST UPDATED 7:38 AM, AUGUST 17, 2010

His critics are calling it 'blood money' and the smartest PR stunt of the year. Parents of soldiers who died in Iraq are saying it will make no difference - they still hold him to blame. But the big question this morning is how much money Tony Blair is actually donating to the Royal British Legion in pledging to hand over the receipts from his upcoming memoir, A Journey.

Crucially, does the donation announced yesterday include the £4.6m advance he received for the book or not?

Most media reports overnight have made the assumption that Blair is giving the Legion all his advance plus any further money he might make from the book if and when it is translated and sold around the world following next month's publication in Britain and the States.

But inquiries by the Daily Telegraph to Blair's office have received no confirmation that this is the case.

The Telegraphclaims to have put detailed questions to Blair's people about the donation, its value and its nature and received no direct answers.

A spokesman told the paper: "It is absolutely everything he would have made from the book" and confirmed that the gift covered all editions published in all countries "in perpetuity".

But he refused to explain what "would have made" means. Does the offer to the British Legioninclude the £4.6m advance or does it apply to the money expectedon top of the advance? That could still be several thousands of pounds - but not millions, unless Blair turns out to have written a masterpiece.

"There are also questions over whether the eventual profits will be donated before they are taxed," says theTelegraph report, "and whether the entire donation will be set against the tax liabilities of the complex web of companies and trusts involved in Mr Blair¹s finances."

Finally, will the donation include the proceeds from any speaking engagements Blair takes on to publicise the book? Again, no one knows.

Pressure to come clean on the actual amount the Royal British Legion can hope to receive for its Battle Back rehabilitation centre will grow as the former PM's critics make it clear his act of charity will never excuse his wrong-headed decision to take Britain to war against Saddam Hussein.

WHAT THEY ARE SAYING:

Peter Brierley, whose 28-year-old son Shaun was killed in Iraq in 2003: "This gift is absolutely fantastic, but it doesn't alter my aim that one day we will see Tony Blair in court for the crimes he committed."

Rose Gentle, anti-Iraq war campaigner whose 19-year-old son was killed in Basra in 2004: "I have spoken to other parents and everyone is agreed that this doesn't make any difference. It is OK doing this now, but it was decisions Blair made when he was prime minister that got us into this situation. I still hold him responsible for the death of my son."

Chris Simpkins, director-general of the Royal British Legion: "Mr Blair's generosity is much appreciated and will help us to make a real and lasting difference to the lives of hundreds of injured personnel."

Clare Short, former Labour Cabinet minister: "It's good to know that he feels guilty. In the Chilcot Inquiry he defended robustly what he has done. This indicates a different tune... It suggests he is haunted, and that is good to know."

Lindsey German, convener of the Stop The War Coalition: "It would have been much better for everyone if he hadn't taken us into these wars in the first place. His attempt to save his conscience will be little comfort to those injured or who have lost their loved ones."

Denis MacShane, Labour MP and former Europe minister: "Not for the first time, Tony Blair trumps his critics. A bold act of generosity from a bold politician."

Comments

Hide comments

If he really wanted to make a difference he should have done this quietly without publicity. Of course his arrogance would not allow that! This is nothing but a publicity stunt to boost sales for what I'm sure will be a mediocre piece of writing.

Posted by Tony Platt at 10:35am on August 17, 2010

It is a case of Dammed if you dont and dammed if you do. Does it matter how much? Every little bit helps. If the money is tainted then should the money be rejected and not used to help?

Posted by Chandra Emmanuel at 11:07am on August 17, 2010

Perhaps the title should be "A Downhill Journey". I hope the RBL actually get the sort of amounts they are expecting but, with the proven Blair record of deception, I have my doubts. It would be very nice to think we could expect an honest and sincere book but that too would be equally delusional.

Posted by michael sheldon at 11:16am on August 17, 2010